One small comment from my side:
As the article notes, the "...antenna melted while increasing
power up to 100 watts". To melt something, there is a need
for substantial power to do so, or in other words: power dissi-
pation in the antenna. This stands in clear contrast to the
other statement
"James E. Lanier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> made an utterence to the drakelist gang
--
It says that a patent is pending. I found no patent or application on the
patent search page.
Jim
-
richard radke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> made an utterence to the drakelist gang
--
Yeah, I know what your saying LeeWon't be sending him a check any
time soon...But, sometimes "truth is stranger than fiction" hi,hi
Rick
"Lee Bahr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> made an utterence to the drakelist gang
--
This guys BS has been circulating for a couple of years now. It's alchemy
so don't hold your breath. It's best to listen to people who know something
abou
richard radke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> made an utterence to the drakelist gang
--
Morning Gang,
Came across this article yesterday...Not highly technical, but more of a
press release...Help may be on the way for antenna challenged hams
5 matches
Mail list logo