Re: [drakelist] INJECTOR CABLE

2004-02-26 Thread Garey Barrell
Jim - The original cables were gray "audio patch" (used for audio until "premium" cables came along) cables about 36" long. One of these cables had a small label "INJ". It looked identical to the rest, except the insulation in the phono connectors was white instead of the phenolic (brown) col

Re: [drakelist] INJECTOR CABLE

2004-02-26 Thread Abqcooks
"Drake originally supplied a low capacity cable specifically for the INJ cable, with the rest being standard audio cables" . My B-line has a set of grey interconnect cables that are unmarked so I have no idea if they are rg-62 or not. Just wo

Re: [drakelist] INJECTOR CABLE

2004-02-23 Thread Al Parker
appreciated here http://www.thecompendium.net/radio/ http://www.hammarlund.info - Original Message - From: "DAN COTSIRILOS" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, February 23, 2004 5:33 PM Subject: [drakelist] INJECTOR CABLE I remember awhile b

Re: [drakelist] INJECTOR CABLE

2004-02-23 Thread Garey Barrell
DAN COTSIRILOS wrote: I remember awhile back a discussion about the inj cable. What's difference if you just use a standard audio cable? Dan Dan - Here is a partial of what I sent some time back. Anything will work, some just better than others. Drake originally supplied a low capacity cabl

Re: [drakelist] INJECTOR CABLE

2004-02-23 Thread W4AWM
<<  I remember awhile back a discussion about the inj cable. What's difference if you just use a standard audio cable?  Dan >> Hi Dan, It would work, but not as well. There is a good chance that you would experience some problems. It is best to use a piece of low capacity cable such as RG-62 for

[drakelist] INJECTOR CABLE

2004-02-23 Thread DAN COTSIRILOS
    I remember awhile back a discussion about the inj cable. What's difference if you just use a standard audio cable?  Dan