Darrell Bellerive <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> made an utterance to the drakelist gang
--
While a balun on the output side of a tuner will couple some energy it may not
be very efficient at some impedances.
A balun, whether 1:1 or 4:1, is
EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Bill Ellis
Sent: Sunday, June 01, 2008 1:45 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [drakelist] MN2000 & balanced feeders
Has anyone been able to adapt the MN2000 for use with open feeders?
Bill, WB9CAC
[EMAIL PROTECTED] made an utterance to the drakelist gang
--
The beauty of the Johnson KW Matchbox is that it has an air coil which, for
most applications, won't saturate like a ferrite core balun (usually
mispronounced balum, b
Ron Wagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> made an utterance to the drakelist gang
--
Been using a Johnson Matchbox with my Drake MN4 for years. Generally just
use the MN4 as a meter and switch. Good to know that I am not the only
"Hill-
"Dennis Monticelli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> made an utterance to the drakelist gang
--
I have a MN2700 and rather than search and pay excessively for the
rare Drake balun, I elected to use a Johnson Matchbox Jr as a balun
substitute.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] made an utterance to the drakelist gang
--
Bill,
Yes, the Drake B-1000 balun (which will cost half the price of the MN-2000)
will enable use of balanced lines with the MN-2000. However, whether it works
well
"Gary Poland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> made an utterance to the drakelist gang
--
Bill,
I have done the same ... 4:1 balun, 450 ohm line feeding a 80 meter
inverted vee. You may have to play around with the feedline length to get a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] made an utterance to the drakelist gang
--
Hi Bill,
I have connected a 4:1 balun at the output of the tuner and it has
worked fine.
73, Mike
On 31 May 2008 at 22:44, Bill Ellis wrote:
>
> Has anyone been ab
Has anyone been able to adapt the MN2000 for use with open feeders?
Bill, WB9CAC
9 matches
Mail list logo
