Re: [drakelist] am band

2004-06-07 Thread Herbert Schulz
Ok, sounds that i have triggered a discussion that is touching emotions...so, some words to clear up the issue: Of course, i am also a fan of analog transmission (and the well built vintage radios associated with it - otherwise i would not be here), anyhow: technology is progressing, and, hopeful

Re: [drakelist] am band

2004-06-07 Thread Greg Putrich
Greg Putrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> made an utterence to the drakelist gang -- I believe you're correct. According to some searching, IBOC was rolled out to a handful of markets, including Chicago. Here's a link that talks about th

FW: [drakelist] am band

2004-06-07 Thread Joe Mann
Title: Message   Has anyone else in the Chicago area noticed the digital signal on both sides of WIND 560?  If that is the kind of interference that broadband is going to make uh oh  Dan   Dan,  I am located in Chicago's South suburbs about 15 miles due West from WIND's transmitter/t

Re: [drakelist] am band

2004-06-07 Thread Mike Hammer
Mike Hammer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> made an utterence to the drakelist gang -- At 02:45 PM 6/7/04 -0500, DAN COTSIRILOS wrote: Has anyone else in the Chicago area noticed the digital signal on both sides of WIND 560? If that is the k

Re: [drakelist] am band

2004-06-07 Thread Herbert Schulz
I'm not an US-citizen, so my following statement is a wild guess, anyhow: Maybe this signal is not an interference, but a transmis- sion of the emerging, new AM-broadcast mode called "DRM" (Digital Radio Mondiale) which uses QAM32 or QAM64 as a modulation method and delivers crystal-clear audio,

[drakelist] am band

2004-06-07 Thread DAN COTSIRILOS
Has anyone else in the Chicago area noticed the digital signal on both sides of WIND 560?  If that is the kind of interference that broadband is going to make uh oh  Dan