On Wed, 17 Jul 2013 10:42:36 +0200, Edi Weitz wrote:
>
> Peter, why are you not using :CONTENT?
>
Because I had not read the documentation carefully enough. :content works fine
for what I need to do. Thanks.
> Cheers,
> Edi.
Regards,
Peter
RFC 2616 says that 'the "multipart/form-data" type has been
specifically defined for carrying form data suitable for processing
via the POST request method,' so I don't think there's an immediate
need to support this content type for other request methods. I'd say
we should cross this bridge when
Hi Edi,
while file uploads only make sense with form data, I could see how one
would encounter an API that uses PUT with form data. I have not seen such
an API myself, but I see no reason not to support such APIs. Do you?
-Hans
Am 17.07.2013 10:42 schrieb "Edi Weitz" :
> I'm also on vacation, so
I'm also on vacation, so just a quick response:
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 8:54 AM, Hans Hübner wrote:
> First off, it seems that DRAKMA restricts the use of file upload parameters
> to POST requests in the WHEN form that you pasted. I do not think that is
> the right thing, as the HTTP standard do
Peter,
I am unsure whether the change that you propose really solves the problem
that you have. First off, it seems that DRAKMA restricts the use of file
upload parameters to POST requests in the WHEN form that you pasted. I do
not think that is the right thing, as the HTTP standard does not res
Hi
Using Drakma-1.3.2 (via quicklisp) and Sbcl-1.1.9 on Linux (Debian Wheezy):
I believe it is allowed to send parameters with a PUT request, just as with a
POST request, but Drakma only allows POST with parameters.
In request.lisp, changing this
(when (and file-parameters-p (not (eq method :
