Hi,
Yes, I did it on purposed, because we are running live systems, so we want
to make that when the other server shutdown or hang without no reason, the
other server should take up the job. That's why I want drbd and heartbeat to
work that way. Maybe I will go with upgrading the kernel. Because m
On Sun, Mar 07, 2010 at 05:43:16PM +0100, Christian Iversen wrote:
> P.S: Have you thought about setting a Reply-To-header? I'm almost
> responding to the auther every time.
"Munging" of that header by mailing list software
has been controversial for ages, and probably will stay that way.
I concu
On 2010-03-04 16:55, Lars Ellenberg wrote:
On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 01:16:52PM +0100, Christian Iversen wrote:
On 2010-02-27 18:57, Dawid Marcin Grzesiak wrote:
Hi,
I just wonder if I can use DRBD to asynchronously mirror two block
devices locally.
For example I want to have a primary (dedicat
Hello,
cLVM doesn't provide snapshots :(
But you say my behaviour is "normal" ? so, why lvcreate/lvremove is
not replicated ? it's not a "block" operation for the bottom layer ?
And if I export a physical volume (and not a LVM one) and then after
on iSCSI volume I do "lvcreate" does it solve the
I wonder how you can do NV_CACHE battery backed. The NV_CACHE in SCST is just
the system memory/page cache. It is not the cache on the RAID card. You could
have UPS hooked to the server running SCST. However, if the system failed
(memory, hardware, or just seg fault) and you had to reboot wi
