Re: [DRBD-user] Can someone help me configure SCST?

2010-03-24 Thread dbarker
Lars Ellenberg wrote: > > drbd0 != drbd1 > > That was it. That's the second Noob mistake of mine you've caught. I really do appreciate it. Thanks. -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Can-someone-help-me-configure-SCST--tp28008268p28014326.html Sent from the DRBD - User

[DRBD-user] automaticly split brain recovery.. my scenario

2010-03-24 Thread Peter den Hartog
Hello and thank you for reading this.. I have the following situation: I have xen cloud running on 8 servers, and nfs+drbd+heartbeat on 2 fileservers. The VM's get streamed from the NFS share, to the xen cloud. So far so good, this works great. When server-1 fails, the virtual machines of the xe

Re: [DRBD-user] Can someone help me configure SCST?

2010-03-24 Thread Lars Ellenberg
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 03:49:32AM -0700, dbarker wrote: > > > > Gennadiy Nerubayev wrote: > > > > > > Is the drbd device that you are presenting primary on this node? :) > > > > > > Yes, it certainly is. > > r...@scst0:~# cat /proc/drbd > version: 8.3.7 (api:88/proto:86-91) > GIT-hash: ea

Re: [DRBD-user] Can someone help me configure SCST?

2010-03-24 Thread dbarker
Gennadiy Nerubayev wrote: > > > Is the drbd device that you are presenting primary on this node? :) > > Yes, it certainly is. r...@scst0:~# cat /proc/drbd version: 8.3.7 (api:88/proto:86-91) GIT-hash: ea9e28dbff98e331a62bcbcc63a6135808fe2917 build by r...@scst0, 2010-03-22 14:22:01 1: cs

Re: [DRBD-user] dual primary mode with which FS

2010-03-24 Thread Stefan Seifert
On Wednesday 24 March 2010 10:52:30 Christian Iversen wrote: > On 2010-03-24 10:42, Stefan Seifert wrote: > > On Wednesday 24 March 2010 09:50:44 Christian Iversen wrote: > >> Are you sure that LVM can create the snapshot without updating the > >> metadata on the device? Because that's not allowed.

Re: [DRBD-user] drbd1: The peer's disk size is too small!

2010-03-24 Thread Lars Ellenberg
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 10:13:54AM -0700, Qwerty-1 wrote: > > Hi All, > > When i start my HA system, My Primary server is not able to make tcp > conection with Secondary Server for replication of one of the resource. It > is able to make TCP Connection for other resource that is replicated betwee

Re: [DRBD-user] dual primary mode with which FS

2010-03-24 Thread Lars Ellenberg
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 10:42:29AM +0100, Stefan Seifert wrote: > On Wednesday 24 March 2010 09:50:44 Christian Iversen wrote: > > > Are you sure that LVM can create the snapshot without updating the > > metadata on the device? Because that's not allowed. > > Actually it never occurred to me that

Re: [DRBD-user] drbd1: The peer's disk size is too small!

2010-03-24 Thread Michael Schwartzkopff
Am Mittwoch, 24. März 2010 10:53:56 schrieb Lars Ellenberg: > On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 10:14:07AM +0100, Michael Schwartzkopff wrote: > > Am Dienstag, 23. März 2010 18:13:54 schrieb Qwerty-1: > > > Hi All, > > > > > > When i start my HA system, My Primary server is not able to make tcp > > > conecti

Re: [DRBD-user] drbd1: The peer's disk size is too small!

2010-03-24 Thread Lars Ellenberg
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 10:14:07AM +0100, Michael Schwartzkopff wrote: > Am Dienstag, 23. März 2010 18:13:54 schrieb Qwerty-1: > > Hi All, > > > > When i start my HA system, My Primary server is not able to make tcp > > conection with Secondary Server for replication of one of the resource. It > >

Re: [DRBD-user] dual primary mode with which FS

2010-03-24 Thread Christian Iversen
On 2010-03-24 10:42, Stefan Seifert wrote: On Wednesday 24 March 2010 09:50:44 Christian Iversen wrote: Are you sure that LVM can create the snapshot without updating the metadata on the device? Because that's not allowed. Actually it never occurred to me that LVM could change the volume. But

Re: [DRBD-user] dual primary mode with which FS

2010-03-24 Thread Stefan Seifert
On Wednesday 24 March 2010 09:50:44 Christian Iversen wrote: > Are you sure that LVM can create the snapshot without updating the > metadata on the device? Because that's not allowed. Actually it never occurred to me that LVM could change the volume. But I could not imagine any reason for it to

Re: [DRBD-user] drbd1: The peer's disk size is too small!

2010-03-24 Thread Michael Schwartzkopff
Am Dienstag, 23. März 2010 18:13:54 schrieb Qwerty-1: > Hi All, > > When i start my HA system, My Primary server is not able to make tcp > conection with Secondary Server for replication of one of the resource. It > is able to make TCP Connection for other resource that is replicated > between Prim

Re: [DRBD-user] dual primary mode with which FS

2010-03-24 Thread Andreas.Ruetten
Hi Sean, Thanks for your answer. This is exactly what we are planning now. Andreas > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Sean Thon [mailto:st...@modwest.com] > Gesendet: Dienstag, 23. März 2010 19:56 > An: Rütten, Andreas > Cc: drbd-user@lists.linbit.com > Betreff: Re: [DRBD-user] dual pr

[DRBD-user] drbd1: The peer's disk size is too small!

2010-03-24 Thread Qwerty-1
Hi All, When i start my HA system, My Primary server is not able to make tcp conection with Secondary Server for replication of one of the resource. It is able to make TCP Connection for other resource that is replicated between Primary and Secondary Server. I have captured the logs and found the

Re: [DRBD-user] dual primary mode with which FS

2010-03-24 Thread Sean Thon
I don't know if someone suggested this already, but you could export the ext3 partition with NFS to the secondary server... andreas.ruet...@hansenet.com wrote: Hi list, first of all please answer also to my email-address because I'm not subscribed to the ML. Here are my questions: I have to

Re: [DRBD-user] dual primary mode with which FS

2010-03-24 Thread Christian Iversen
On 2010-03-24 08:05, Stefan Seifert wrote: On Tuesday 23 March 2010 22:57:39 Christian Iversen wrote: Well, there's that. But the *primary* can't change anything either! Data would change while the filesystem expects it not to. Even if you somehow disable all caching (which you can't do without

Re: [DRBD-user] dual primary mode with which FS

2010-03-24 Thread Stefan Seifert
On Tuesday 23 March 2010 22:57:39 Christian Iversen wrote: > Well, there's that. But the *primary* can't change anything either! Data > would change while the filesystem expects it not to. Even if you somehow > disable all caching (which you can't do without changing the kernel), > you would STILL