>>How do I make it UpToDate and Primary without a Secondary disk up yet?
>
># drbdadm -- 61 set-gi drbd-data
Should have refreshed my own memory, probably a better/supported way is
to follow the last few comments in this thread:
http://old.nabble.com/Skipping-initial-sync,-and-full-sync-after
On Apr 29, 2010, at 12:47 PM, Chad Sine wrote:
How do I make it UpToDate and Primary without a Secondary disk up yet?
http://www.drbd.org/users-guide/s-initial-full-sync.html
Since there's no secondary node, your device will become primary, and
have a connection state WFConnection (waitin
>How do I make it UpToDate and Primary without a Secondary disk up yet?
# drbdadm -- 61 set-gi drbd-data
___
drbd-user mailing list
drbd-user@lists.linbit.com
http://lists.linbit.com/mailman/listinfo/drbd-user
After I create the primary /dev/drbd0 with `drbdadm create-md drbd-data`,
how the state is inconsistent and it is Secondary
[r...@centos54 ~]# cat /proc/drbd
version: 8.3.2 (api:88/proto:86-90)
GIT-hash: dd7985327f146f33b86d4bff5ca8c94234ce840e build by
mockbu...@v20z-x86-64.home.local, 2009-08-29
On Thursday 29 April 2010 16:33:27 Brian R. Hellman wrote:
> On 04/29/2010 08:25 AM, Chad Sine wrote:
> > Is it possible to create a DRBD device on the Primary and use it
> > without a Secondary? I'd like to partition, and place files on the
> > primary before putting the secondary online and then
Hi,
As a newbie to DRBD could anyone answer the following or make
reasonable
suggestions?
Is it possible to create a DRBD cluster with only 1 node initialised?
If it
is how long would it work before lack of resources (disk space, I guess) would
break it?
Scenario:
We
On 04/29/2010 08:25 AM, Chad Sine wrote:
> Is it possible to create a DRBD device on the Primary and use it
> without a Secondary? I'd like to partition, and place files on the
> primary before putting the secondary online and then and then
> synchronize the secondary at a later time.
>
> Thank Y
Is it possible to create a DRBD device on the Primary and use it without a
Secondary? I'd like to partition, and place files on the primary before
putting the secondary online and then and then synchronize the secondary at
a later time.
Thank You,
Chad
___
On 04/29/2010 04:00 AM, Miles Fidelman wrote:
> Bernd Petrovitsch wrote:
>> A usual workaround is to create a degenerated cluster and move the files
>> to the degenerated DRBD device. And then lets the original one resync
>> it.
>>
>>
> Could you elaborate just a little on the steps invo
Well, that about sums that up. Ugh. My ego was just hit by a Buick. :-)
btw, /dev/sda3 was just swap.
Thanks for your help guys
Chad
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 3:51 AM, Lars Ellenberg
wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 05:52:18PM -0400, Chad Sine wrote:
> > DRBD Users,
> >
> > I'm setting up 2 Ce
Bernd Petrovitsch wrote:
A usual workaround is to create a degenerated cluster and move the files
to the degenerated DRBD device. And then lets the original one resync
it.
Could you elaborate just a little on the steps involved in doing this?
Thanks,
Miles Fidelman
--
In theory,
>I seem to be having a problem with load. I have four servers.
>
>Two are web servers and the other two are MySQL (Master - Master
>Replication) and NFS servers. Between the two SQL, I have DRBD running
>in Active / Passive setup.
So MySQL is Master/Master, but drbd is Active/Passive? What is wr
On 2010-04-29 10:38, Bernd Petrovitsch wrote:
> On Don, 2010-04-29 at 09:35 +0100, Joao Ferreira gmail wrote:
>> can I "install" drbd on an existing ext3 formated partition that already
>> contains data written on it ?
>
> If you do that, you will overwrite all the data (and the filesystem as
> su
On Don, 2010-04-29 at 09:35 +0100, Joao Ferreira gmail wrote:
> can I "install" drbd on an existing ext3 formated partition that already
> contains data written on it ?
If you do that, you will overwrite all the data (and the filesystem as
such).
> or does the drbd setup process force me to start
On Thursday 29 April 2010 10:35:08 Joao Ferreira gmail wrote:
> can I "install" drbd on an existing ext3 formated partition that already
> contains data written on it ?
>
> or does the drbd setup process force me to start with a raw unformated
> partition ?
>
> (I'm 99% sure this is not possible
can I "install" drbd on an existing ext3 formated partition that already
contains data written on it ?
or does the drbd setup process force me to start with a raw unformated
partition ?
(I'm 99% sure this is not possible but... fingers crossed and hope for
the best )
Thank you
Joao
___
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 05:52:18PM -0400, Chad Sine wrote:
> DRBD Users,
>
> I'm setting up 2 CentOS 5.4 x86_64 servers to use DRBD. I set them up to do
> RAID1, but /dev/drbd0 only shows up at 12GB instead of the 1.8 TB that the
> underlying devices have.
>
> Both boxes are configured just like
Chad Sine wrote:
DRBD Users,
I'm setting up 2 CentOS 5.4 x86_64 servers to use DRBD. I set them up
to do RAID1, but /dev/drbd0 only shows up at 12GB instead of the 1.8
TB that the underlying devices have.
Both boxes are configured just like this, with 1800GB for /dev/sda4
[r...@centos54 et
Hi,
I'm trying to take a production system, and create a hot-spare - using
DRBD and Xen live migration.
Pretty much all of the documentation I've seen talks about starting with
two bare-iron boxes, and setting up a replicated environment.
What I haven't seen is any guidance on whether one c
DRBD Users,
I'm setting up 2 CentOS 5.4 x86_64 servers to use DRBD. I set them up to do
RAID1, but /dev/drbd0 only shows up at 12GB instead of the 1.8 TB that the
underlying devices have.
Both boxes are configured just like this, with 1800GB for /dev/sda4
[r...@centos54 etc]# parted
GNU Parted
20 matches
Mail list logo
