Re: [DRBD-user] Disk I/O direct vs. Drbd

2010-08-13 Thread Bart Coninckx
On Friday 13 August 2010 12:05:40 roberto.fas...@gmail.com wrote: > Hi Bart, > > My drbd replication channel is dedicated crossovered gigabit nic > > Thank you for any confirmation. > > Robert > Le mail ti raggiungono ovunque con BlackBerry® from Vodafone! > _

Re: [DRBD-user] Disk I/O direct vs. Drbd

2010-08-13 Thread roberto . fastec
My drbd replication channel is dedicated crossovered gigabit nic Thank you for any confirmation. Robert Le mail ti raggiungono ovunque con BlackBerry® from Vodafone! -Original Message- From: drbd-user-requ...@lists.linbit.com Sender: drbd-user-boun...@lists.linbit.com Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2

Re: [DRBD-user] Disk I/O direct vs. Drbd

2010-08-13 Thread roberto . fastec
Hi Bart, My drbd replication channel is dedicated crossovered gigabit nic Thank you for any confirmation. Robert Le mail ti raggiungono ovunque con BlackBerry® from Vodafone! ___ drbd-user mailing list drbd-user@lists.linbit.com http://lists.linbit.com

Re: [DRBD-user] Disk I/O direct vs. Drbd

2010-08-13 Thread Bart Coninckx
On Friday 13 August 2010 10:42:13 roberto.fas...@gmail.com wrote: > In my linux system, I/O expecially write speed is 90MB/sec > > Installing drbd makes it slow to 30MB/sec. > > I suppose that drbd tracking and logs processes are obviously write and > read consumers. > > My question is if you c

[DRBD-user] Disk I/O direct vs. Drbd

2010-08-13 Thread roberto . fastec
In my linux system, I/O expecially write speed is 90MB/sec Installing drbd makes it slow to 30MB/sec. I suppose that drbd tracking and logs processes are obviously write and read consumers. My question is if you confirm that this ratio 90MB/sec that slows to 30 is to be considered as expected

Re: [DRBD-user] Initial sync, just want to confirm the process (and not go down in a blaze of glory)

2010-08-13 Thread Simon Billis
Simon Billis sent a missive on 2010-08-13: > Lars Ellenberg sent a missive on 2010-08-13: >>> #You should see something like: >>> [r...@raid-primary ~]# drbdadm status >> api="88"> >> minor="1" name="drbd1" >>> cs="StandAlone" ro1="Primary" ro2="Unknown" >>> ds1="UpToDate" ds2="DUnknown" /> >> >

Re: [DRBD-user] Initial sync, just want to confirm the process (and not go down in a blaze of glory)

2010-08-13 Thread Simon Billis
Lars Ellenberg sent a missive on 2010-08-13: > On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 07:00:50AM +0100, Simon Billis wrote: >> Hi, >>> Subject: Re: [DRBD-user] Initial sync, just want to confirm the >>> process (and not go down in a blaze of glory) >>> >>> Hmm sorry Dan, but this has left me a little confused.

[DRBD-user] Question about promoting secondary to primary

2010-08-13 Thread hansolox1
I am using drbd on openfiler. Not using heartbeat or any other ha config. I have successfully setup drbd replicating changes from the primary node to the secondary node. I can access the primary nodes iscsi lun from esxi and it is working fine with no errors. When I look at the volume group fo

Re: [DRBD-user] Initial sync, just want to confirm the process (and not go down in a blaze of glory)

2010-08-13 Thread Lars Ellenberg
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 07:00:50AM +0100, Simon Billis wrote: > Hi, > > Subject: Re: [DRBD-user] Initial sync, just want to confirm the process > > (and not go down in a blaze of glory) > > > > Hmm sorry Dan, but this has left me a little confused. > > As I said in my first post, storage00 is LIVE