Re: [DRBD-user] Very poor performance

On 24/08/12 06:09, Arnold Krille wrote: > Hi, > > On Friday 24 August 2012 01:56:37 Adam Goryachev wrote: >> I have a pair of DRBD machines, and I'm getting very poor performance >> from the DRBD when the second server is connected. I've been working on >> resolving the performance issues for a few

Re: [DRBD-user] oracle on drbd failed

another error occurs in oracle : ORA-00214: control file '/oradata/orcl/control01.ctl' version 79111 inconsistent with file '/oradata/flash_recovery_area/orcl/control02.ctl' version 79104 Is it sure that protocol A can not keep the oracle's data integration ? 2012/8/27 Mia Lueng : > I think t

Re: [DRBD-user] Split brain when starting resources by Pacemaker

Hi. Since there was no one hint to solve this trouble, the only temporary solution I found to allow me to continue with the cluster configuration was wipe out all the related DRBD configuration from the crm and start the DRBD resources by the /etc/init.d/drbd init script. If someone have anot

Re: [DRBD-user] Promote secondary to primary fails in some situations

On 08/28/2012 03:43 AM, Felix Frank wrote: Hi, this is old stuff, so I hope it's even still relevant. Some remarks inline. Thanks for the follow up, I since figured out the issue, and (as always) it was config related. The monitor op on the ping primitive was incorrect. -- Regards, Nik N

Re: [DRBD-user] Failure: (119) No valid meta-data signature found after expanding the underlying block device

Hi, On 08/24/2012 11:04 AM, Yannis Milios wrote: > The underlying block device (/dev/sdb) is a hardware raid-5 array on > both nodes (total 500gb). > I tried to expand this device by adding additional hdd on each node (now > 750gb). > After that giving fdisk -l /dev/sdb I can see the new disk size

Re: [DRBD-user] PingAsk timeout.

simon написал: > I used drbd 8.3.7 on HA. When Master host is dead and HA swatches from > Master to Slave, the drbd can't switch because it spends 10 minutes to mount > its partition. But the time is timeout to HA.(in HA, default overtime is 2 > miniutes). > > > > Why does drbd spent that long

[DRBD-user] kernel said Oops with a NULL pointer dereference

Hello, I have a problem with DRBD. Strangely, I first had some out of sync resources. Writing to FS over DRBD was also very very slow, even sometimes hangued. I did some tests : I stopped DRBD on secondary node. Writing to FS was then OK. I re-started DRBD on secondary node. Synchronisation was

Re: [DRBD-user] Drbd : PingAsk timeout, about 10 mins.

Hi, On 08/19/2012 09:01 AM, roberto.fas...@gmail.com wrote: > The editing phase should focus on remove (as example, in this thread), such > kilometric log text: > what should be the sense of keeping multiples and multiples repetitions of in > ALL the replies? while I more or less sympathize, i

Re: [DRBD-user] PingAsk timeout.

Yes, Simon, thanks for the yesterday's ifconfig reports (Which did not reveal anything wrong BTW), but I also asked you the "crm configure show" results and you still omitted it... Regards, Pascal. -Message d'origine- De : drbd-user-boun...@lists.linbit.com [mailto:drbd-user-boun...@list

Re: [DRBD-user] Manual Stack

On 08/17/2012 06:38 PM, J.R. Lillard wrote: > I was wondering if it's possible to to create a DRBD resource on top of > another one without using the stacked configuration options. Uhm, why? Stacking would be the exact solution to your problem. Please note that making B the replication master for

Re: [DRBD-user] PingAsk timeout.

On 08/16/2012 05:18 AM, simon wrote: > According to the log, the timeout is PingAsk operation. PingAck did not arrive: DRBD just noticed the peer is dead. Funny this happens much later for drbd0 than drbd1, but there you have it. The problem is probably with your "HA" configuration, because it's

Re: [DRBD-user] sock_sendmsg time expired

Hi, On 08/14/2012 09:20 PM, Jacob Avraham wrote: > Is this a bug in DRBD? Other TCP traffic works fine. Not likely a bug. > Is this timeout configurable from DRBD side or is it TCP configuration? This should be a DRBD specific thing. You may want to make sure that the syncer rate is really app

Re: [DRBD-user] Promote secondary to primary fails in some situations

Hi, this is old stuff, so I hope it's even still relevant. Some remarks inline. On 08/06/2012 08:39 PM, Nik Martin wrote: > 2 Storage Servers, named SAN-n1 and SAN-n2, with the following config: > ... > on san01-n1 { Uhm? > First, my CIB: It's a pacemaker config, but all the better! > pri

Re: [DRBD-user] stacking drbd 3 high

On 08/06/2012 12:55 AM, Two Spirit wrote: > basically nesting the stacked-on-top-of twice. > > On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 2:47 PM, Two Spirit > wrote: > > Hi, I'm thinking of having my primary/secondary file servers with my > primo equipment, then an onsite ro