Re: [DRBD-user] NetworkFailure after 2 days of operation in active/active

2012-12-04 Thread Stefan Midjich
The problem ended up being incorrect order and colocation setup in the cib. Everything is stable now. And yes, fencing is crucial! Everyone keeps saying that but I haven't ran into a situation where it was needed yet. I tend to do failover tests to test the fencing. 2012/12/3 Lars Ellenberg >

Re: [DRBD-user] Dual Primary dead with 8.4.2

2012-12-04 Thread Florian Haas
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 5:01 PM, Henning Ryll wrote: > Hello, > > I have tried to make a dual primary setup, but can't get it work. > I'm using two Celisus 550 Workstations with two sata drives on each machine > building a softraid 0. > There are dedicated 1GBit network cards for use with drbd dir

Re: [DRBD-user] DRBD 8.4.2 Doesn't Compile Against 3.7 Kernel

2012-12-04 Thread Shaun Thomas
On 12/04/2012 02:47 AM, Lars Ellenberg wrote: The next merge window (so, 3.8) should see the equivalent of 8.4.2, plus patches (whatever comes up during the merge window). Well, what do you know: #define REL_VERSION "8.3.13" That would explain a couple things, anyway. Maybe you should get

Re: [DRBD-user] DRBD 8.4.2 Doesn't Compile Against 3.7 Kernel

2012-12-04 Thread Dzianis Kahanovich
Lars Ellenberg пишет: >> We were asked to do some Ubuntu testing against an upstream 3.7 >> kernel, and it turns out the 8.4.2 included with a vanilla 3.7 > > There is no 8.4 in "vanilla" yet. > 3.7 should be more like 8.3.13 Even 3.6 (.6, .7) better to not use, just becouse unstable. This is un

Re: [DRBD-user] DRBD 8.4.2 Doesn't Compile Against 3.7 Kernel

2012-12-04 Thread Lars Ellenberg
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 11:15:13AM -0600, Shaun Thomas wrote: > Hey guys, > > We were asked to do some Ubuntu testing against an upstream 3.7 > kernel, and it turns out the 8.4.2 included with a vanilla 3.7 There is no 8.4 in "vanilla" yet. 3.7 should be more like 8.3.13 The next merge window (s