On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 06:30:23PM +0200, Lutz Vieweg wrote:
> On 06/06/2013 02:51 PM, Lars Ellenberg wrote:
> >You did something bad, and that confused the IO stack.
>
> I would have expected any kind of error message from any of the
> tools I used to increase the device sized if I actually
> did
On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 03:39:19PM +0200, Sebastian Riemer wrote:
> On 04.06.2013 11:56, Lutz Vieweg wrote:
> [...]
> > What concerns me is that after the resizing, /var/log/messages
> > accumulated a few dozen of these messages (only on the primary):
> >> Jun 4 10:56:40 kernel: bio too big devic
On 06/06/2013 02:51 PM, Lars Ellenberg wrote:
You did something bad, and that confused the IO stack.
I would have expected any kind of error message from any of the
tools I used to increase the device sized if I actually
did something bad...
This causes IO errors.
Interestingly, while these
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 8:53 AM, Adam Goryachev
wrote:
> On 06/06/13 22:42, Lars Ellenberg wrote:
>> On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 11:52:58PM +0800, Mia Lueng wrote:
>>> I have 16G RAM in this server. Using a low dirty configuration may lead
>>> to a pool I/O performance?
>> Maybe this blog post, and t
On 04.06.2013 11:56, Lutz Vieweg wrote:
[...]
> What concerns me is that after the resizing, /var/log/messages
> accumulated a few dozen of these messages (only on the primary):
>> Jun 4 10:56:40 kernel: bio too big device drbd0 (304 > 256)
>> Jun 4 10:56:40 kernel: bio too big device drbd0 (26
On 06/06/13 22:42, Lars Ellenberg wrote:
> On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 11:52:58PM +0800, Mia Lueng wrote:
>> I have 16G RAM in this server. Using a low dirty configuration may lead
>> to a pool I/O performance?
> Maybe this blog post, and the links referenced therein help?
> https://blogs.linbit.com/
On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 11:56:34AM +0200, Lutz Vieweg wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I recently increased the size of a DRBD, first increasing the
> underlying Logical Volume with a command like
> lvresize --nofsck --extents N DataVG/DataLV
> then I invoked
> drbdadm resize ResourceData
> and finally
> crypt
On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 02:22:54PM +0200, Grzegorz Wolny wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I read article about DRBD 8.4.3 and performance improvement in
> random tests:
> http://blogs.linbit.com/p/469/843-random-writes-faster/
>
> I compared DRBD 8.3.10 and 8.4.3 and achieved strange results.
>
> * 300GB vo
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 05:52:45PM -0400, Jonathan Woodbury wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> In reading this page (http://www.drbd.org/users-guide-8.3/s-gi.html) your
> online docs, in the "How DRBD uses generation identifiers" -> #5 "Current
> UUID matches peer's historical UUID" section, I found something
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 11:52:58PM +0800, Mia Lueng wrote:
> I have 16G RAM in this server. Using a low dirty configuration may lead
> to a pool I/O performance?
Maybe this blog post, and the links referenced therein help?
https://blogs.linbit.com/p/548/umount-takes-time/
http://lists.linbit.co
10 matches
Mail list logo
