Re: [DRBD-user] Drbdmanaged

2017-06-12 Thread Jaz Khan
Hi Ronald, Thank you for the reply. The reason why I have asked you this question is because if we run dbus-drbdmanaged on all three nodes simultaneously, if one of the two secondary node goes down and when it comes up then it sees another secondary node as outdated. To fix it, I have to kill

Re: [DRBD-user] Gossamer Threads Mailing List Archive - drbd / Users digest

2017-06-12 Thread Jaz Khan
Hi Ronald, Thank you for the reply. The reason why I have asked you this question is because if we run dbus-drbdmanaged on all three nodes simultaneously, if one of the two secondary node goes down and when it comes up then it sees another secondary node as outdated. To fix it, I have to kill

[DRBD-user] drbd-9.0.8rc2

2017-06-12 Thread Philipp Reisner
Hi, This time testers where more active than usual. All the brought up issues where _not_ regressions of the current cycle. So, again, the call for all testers: Let us know if there is anything that needs to be fixed before the 9.0.8 release. 9.0.8rc2-1 (api:genl2/proto:86-112/transport:14)

Re: [DRBD-user] [drbd 9] system hang with huge number of ASSERTION failure in dmesg

2017-06-12 Thread David Lee
On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 5:45 PM, Lars Ellenberg wrote: > On Fri, Jun 09, 2017 at 11:39:05PM +0800, David Lee wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I am experimenting with DRBD dual-primary with OCFS 2, and DRBD client as > > well. > > With the hope that every node can access the

[DRBD-user] Strange status with drbd-overview

2017-06-12 Thread JdT
Hi, I have a strange situation on a three nodes Proxmox with drbd. root@dmz-pve3:~ # drbd-overview 0:.drbdctrl/0 Connected(3*) Secondary(3*) UpTo(dmz-pve3)/UpTo(dmz-pve2,dmz-pve1) 1:.drbdctrl/1 Connected(3*) Secondary(3*)

Re: [DRBD-user] DRBDmanage (re)initialization

2017-06-12 Thread Julien Escario
Le 12/06/2017 à 10:09, Robert Altnoeder a écrit : > On 06/12/2017 09:39 AM, Julien Escario wrote: > >> Finally, I've been able to fully restore vm4 and vm5 (drbdsetup and >> drbdmanage >> working) but not vm7. >> >> I've done that by firewalling port 6999 (port used by .drbdctrl ressource) >>

Re: [DRBD-user] [drbd 9] system hang with huge number of ASSERTION failure in dmesg

2017-06-12 Thread Lars Ellenberg
On Fri, Jun 09, 2017 at 11:39:05PM +0800, David Lee wrote: > Hi, > > I am experimenting with DRBD dual-primary with OCFS 2, and DRBD client as > well. > With the hope that every node can access the storage in an unified way. > But I got a > kernel call trace and huge number of ASSERTION failure

Re: [DRBD-user] DRBDmanage (re)initialization

2017-06-12 Thread Julien Escario
Le 12/06/2017 à 09:57, Roland Kammerer a écrit : > Without access to that machine, I'd say that is how you have to resolve > it (reboot). And yes, we also saw these hangs in old drbd9 versions. Ok, good to know. Of course, I won't ask you to go further without a proper support contract. It was

Re: [DRBD-user] DRBDmanage (re)initialization

2017-06-12 Thread Robert Altnoeder
On 06/12/2017 09:39 AM, Julien Escario wrote: > Finally, I've been able to fully restore vm4 and vm5 (drbdsetup and drbdmanage > working) but not vm7. > > I've done that by firewalling port 6999 (port used by .drbdctrl ressource) and > issuing a down/up on drbdctrl on vm4 and vm5. > > [...] > >

Re: [DRBD-user] DRBDmanage (re)initialization

2017-06-12 Thread Roland Kammerer
On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 09:39:08AM +0200, Julien Escario wrote: > Le 09/06/2017 à 14:24, Julien Escario a écrit : > > Le 09/06/2017 à 09:59, Robert Altnoeder a écrit : > >> On 06/08/2017 04:14 PM, Julien Escario wrote: > >>> Hello, > >>> A drbdmanage cluster is actually stuck in this state : > >>>

Re: [DRBD-user] DRBDmanage (re)initialization

2017-06-12 Thread Julien Escario
Le 09/06/2017 à 14:24, Julien Escario a écrit : > Le 09/06/2017 à 09:59, Robert Altnoeder a écrit : >> On 06/08/2017 04:14 PM, Julien Escario wrote: >>> Hello, >>> A drbdmanage cluster is actually stuck in this state : >>> .drbdctrl role:Secondary >>> volume:0 disk:UpToDate >>> volume:1

Re: [DRBD-user] Drbdmanaged

2017-06-12 Thread Roland Kammerer
On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 03:44:39PM +0500, Jaz Khan wrote: > Hi, > > I have a very simple & important question to ask. > > If I have a 3 nodes setup, do I need to have "dbus-drbdmanaged" > daemon/process to be running in the background on all 3 nodes OR just on > the primary node? all. > P.S. I

Re: [DRBD-user] DRBD kernel independent rpm

2017-06-12 Thread Roland Kammerer
On Sun, Jun 11, 2017 at 06:18:40AM +, Tomer Azran wrote: > Hello all, > > I wat to use DRBD 9.0 on CentOS 7. The elrepo rpms are not updated so > I will compile drbd from sources. I want to create a kernel > independent module, since I don't want to compile the DRBD module > every time