I create a large data drive out of a bunch of small SSDs using RAID and
make that RAID drive an LVM PV.
I can then create LVM volume groups and volumes for each use (in my case
virtual drives for KVM) to back specific DRBD resources for each VM. It
allows me to have a DRBD resource for each V
On Tue, May 01, 2018 at 04:14:52PM +, Remolina, Diego J wrote:
> Hi, was wondering if you could guide me as to what could be the issue here. I
> configured 3 servers with drbdmanage-0.99.16-1 and drbd-9.3.1-1 and related
> packages.
>
>
> I created a zfs pool, then use zfs2.Zfs2 plugin and
Hi, was wondering if you could guide me as to what could be the issue here. I
configured 3 servers with drbdmanage-0.99.16-1 and drbd-9.3.1-1 and related
packages.
I created a zfs pool, then use zfs2.Zfs2 plugin and created a resource. All
seems fine, up to the point when I want to test the re
I would prefer the 2nd option. Ideally all disks would be members of a
RAID(10?) array, with DRBD sitting on top for the replication, and LVM for
managing the volume.
Another option would be ZFS managing the disks and the volume, while DRBD
sitting on top for the replication. This very same scenar
Hi to all
Let's assume 3 servers with 12 disks each
Would you create one resource per disk and then manage them with something
like LVM or a single resource from a huge volume over all disks?
___
drbd-user mailing list
drbd-user@lists.linbit.com
http://li
On 01/05/18 08:22, Roland Kammerer wrote:
On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 02:59:23PM +0300, Ran Shalit wrote:
Hello,
I've seen in tutorial that we format the /dev/drbd0 block device
(mkfs.ext4 /dev/drbd0).
Should it give the same result as if we formatted the real device (for
example /dev/sdb1) or are
On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 02:59:23PM +0300, Ran Shalit wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've seen in tutorial that we format the /dev/drbd0 block device
> (mkfs.ext4 /dev/drbd0).
> Should it give the same result as if we formatted the real device (for
> example /dev/sdb1) or are there any differences ?
When yo
