On Tue, Aug 03, 2021 at 03:34:58PM -0700, Paul D. O'Rorke wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have been running a DRDB-8 simple 3 node disaster recovery set up of
> libvirt VMs for a number of years and have been very happy with it. Our
> needs are simple, 2 servers on Protocol C, each running a handful of V
On Thu, Aug 05, 2021 at 11:53:44PM +0200, Janusz Jaskiewicz wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I'm experimenting a bit with DRBD in a cluster managed by Pacemaker.
> It's a two node, active-passive cluster and the service that I'm
> trying to put in the cluster writes to the file system.
> The service manages ma
On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 07:07:41AM +0100, TJ wrote:
> I've got a rather unique scenario and need to allow non-exclusive
> read-only opening of the drbd device on the Secondary.
> Then I thought to use a device-mapper COW snapshot - so the underlying
> drbd device is never changed but the snapshot
Hi Lars,
On 26.08.21 15:03, Lars Ellenberg wrote:
As we put on our web page at https://linbit.com/solutions-rfq/
DRBD 8 < 8.4 is end of life.
DRBD 8.4 has left "active maintenance" years ago, but needs to be supported
while existing customers pay for existing deployments. The "relevant" platfo
Thanks Lars,
DRBD 9 does everything DRBD 8 does.
Some things it does better.
And it can do some things you may not (yet) need.
I went ahead and did the reading... ;-) I will move to DRBD9.
You can use DRBD 9 the same way you used DRBD 8, if you want to.
(some config options have been rena
