Re: [DRBD-user] [SOLVED] switch over takes a quite long time

The IP in drbd.conf for node3 was wrong on 2 nodes! Pierre LEBRECH a écrit : > Hello, > > context : 3-node cluster, every node connected, HA services on node1, DRBD > version 8.3.2 on linux 2.6.30. > > I switch HA services over to node2 with "/usr/lib/heartbeat/hb_sta

Re: [DRBD-user] [SOLVED] split brain detected when switching back to the 2node cluster from the DR node

Arrgh!! The IP in drbd.conf for node3 was wrong on 2 nodes! Now the switch over from node3 to the 2node cluster works without split-brain! Pierre LEBRECH a écrit : > Hello, > > Thank you for your answer. > > Yes, I can use these commands to handle split-brains. > > B

Re: [DRBD-user] [SOLVED] lost connection on node3 when switching over from node1 to node2

Arrgh! The IP in drbd.conf for node3 was wrong on 2 nodes! Pierre LEBRECH a écrit : > hello, > > when I switch over HA services from node1 to node2, node3 looses its > connection. But nearly 10 seconds later, it > reconnects automatically. > > Is it normal? > >

Re: [DRBD-user] split brain detected when switching back to the 2node cluster from the DR node

Hello, Thank you for your answer. Yes, I can use these commands to handle split-brains. BUT, the thing I don't understand is why I get split-brain in this scenario. I think it's not normal to get such a split-brain when I manually switch HA services from node3 to the 2node cluster. If we look

[DRBD-user] split brain detected when switching back to the 2node cluster from the DR node

Hello, I always get a split brain when I switch the HA services back to the 2node cluster from my DR node. Here are the steps I follow : - HA services are on the DR node - I stop these HA services - I umount the data The state of DRBD on node3 is as follow : -- ver

[DRBD-user] lost connection on node3 when switching over from node1 to node2

hello, when I switch over HA services from node1 to node2, node3 looses its connection. But nearly 10 seconds later, it reconnects automatically. Is it normal? context : 3-node cluster, every node connected, HA services on node1, DRBD version 8.3.2 on linux 2.6.30. here is the drbd.c

[DRBD-user] switch over takes a quite long time

Hello, context : 3-node cluster, every node connected, HA services on node1, DRBD version 8.3.2 on linux 2.6.30. I switch HA services over to node2 with "/usr/lib/heartbeat/hb_standby all" from node1. It takes a long time to perform : 20 seconds. I have this in logs (ha-log) : on node1 : Re

[DRBD-user] WFC stays a longtime before connect

Hello, start context : 3-node cluster, every node connected, HA services on node1, DRBD version 8.3.2rc1 on linux 2.6.30. I switch HA services to node2 with "/usr/lib/heartbeat/hb_standby all" from node1. Well, it worked but for drbd1 (stacked resource) it stays many many seconds (15/20 seco

Re: [DRBD-user] drbdadm segfault with version drbd-8.3.2rc1

Thanks Phil, it works. Philipp Reisner wrote : > On Friday 26 June 2009 12:27:12 Philipp Reisner wrote: >> On Friday 26 June 2009 09:49:06 Pierre LEBRECH wrote: >>> Well, I've just tried drbd-8.3.2rc2 but I got the same symptom : >>> >>> drbdadm[19884]: se

Re: [DRBD-user] drbdadm segfault with version drbd-8.3.2rc1

After investigation, it appears that host->lower->me is NULL. Dont't know why for the moment. Pierre LEBRECH wrote : > Well, I've just tried drbd-8.3.2rc2 but I got the same symptom : > > drbdadm[19884]: segfault at 4 ip 0804e91a sp bfa9ce80 error 4 in > drbdadm[

Re: [DRBD-user] drbdadm segfault with version drbd-8.3.2rc1

>lower->me->device) -- Any help appreciated... Thanks Lars Ellenberg wrote : > On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 10:54:24AM +0200, Pierre LEBRECH wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I have just compiled drbd 8.3.2rc1 without any problems on 3 nodes(*). >

[DRBD-user] drbdadm segfault with version drbd-8.3.2rc1

Hello, I have just compiled drbd 8.3.2rc1 without any problems on 3 nodes(*). But, one one node only, drbdadm gives me a segfault. from dmesg, I have this : drbdadm[23290]: segfault at 4 ip 0804e54a sp bfcdfb60 error 4 in drbdadm[8048000+1c000] Any help will be appreciated... Thanks PS : (*)