Il giorno ven 11 mag 2018 alle ore 11:58 Robert Altnoeder <
robert.altnoe...@linbit.com> ha scritto:
> If it s supposed to become a storage system (e.g., one that is used by
> the Hypervisors via NFS), then the whole thing is a different story, and
> we may be talking about an active/passive NFS st
On 05/10/2018 09:44 PM, Gandalf Corvotempesta wrote:
> Il giorno mer 2 mag 2018 alle ore 08:33 Paul O'Rorke
> mailto:p...@tracker-software.com>> ha scritto:
>
> I create a large data drive out of a bunch of small SSDs using
> RAID and make that RAID drive an LVM PV.
>
> I can then creat
Too many drbd resources to manage.
I prefere a single resource, if possible.
fair enough. I like the granularity and independence. I have fewer
than 20 resources/VMs.
I've no working experience with ZFS so I can't help you there. I'm
pretty sure I've seen it discussed here though. Have you
Il giorno mer 2 mag 2018 alle ore 08:33 Paul O'Rorke <
p...@tracker-software.com> ha scritto:
> I create a large data drive out of a bunch of small SSDs using RAID and
> make that RAID drive an LVM PV.
>
> I can then create LVM volume groups and volumes for each use (in my case
> virtual drives fo
I create a large data drive out of a bunch of small SSDs using RAID and
make that RAID drive an LVM PV.
I can then create LVM volume groups and volumes for each use (in my case
virtual drives for KVM) to back specific DRBD resources for each VM. It
allows me to have a DRBD resource for each V
I would prefer the 2nd option. Ideally all disks would be members of a
RAID(10?) array, with DRBD sitting on top for the replication, and LVM for
managing the volume.
Another option would be ZFS managing the disks and the volume, while DRBD
sitting on top for the replication. This very same scenar
Hi to all
Let's assume 3 servers with 12 disks each
Would you create one resource per disk and then manage them with something
like LVM or a single resource from a huge volume over all disks?
___
drbd-user mailing list
drbd-user@lists.linbit.com
http://li