Hi,
Am Donnerstag, 23. März 2023, 10:21:22 CET schrieb Philipp Reisner:
> Thanks for sending this bug report, including instructions on
> reproducing it. At first, I ignored your report because I could not
> reproduce the issue. Thanks to your persistence, I realized that this
> issue only repro
Hi Markus,
Thanks for sending this bug report, including instructions on
reproducing it. At first, I ignored your report because I could not
reproduce the issue. Thanks to your persistence, I realized that this
issue only reproduces on the versions you reported. So it is something
that is alread
Hi,
Am Dienstag, 21. März 2023, 17:59:37 CET schrieb Markus Hochholdinger:
> Still wondering why the diskless quorum is not working for me.
I've tested the following drbd versions:
9.1.0 ok
9.1.5 ok
9.1.6 ok
9.1.7 fail
9.1.8 fail
9.1.13 fail
9.2.0 fail
9.2.1 fail
9.2.2 fail
Between 9.1.6 and 9.1
Hi,
Am Dienstag, 21. März 2023, 15:45:19 CET schrieb Markus Hochholdinger:
> I tried the third node as diskfull node with no success, two primaries with
> split brain is the result.
I've to correct this. With three diskfull clients, it is working, because if A
and B are disconnected, C is still
Hi,
I still have no solution for this. I tried different versions of drbd:
9.2.2
9.2.1
9.1.12
I tried the third node as diskfull node with no success, two primaries with
split brain is the result.
Nevertheless the documentation clearly describes how it SHOULD work:
https://linbit.com/drbd-user-g
Hi,
I'm using drbd 9.2.2 and using the quorum feature together with the diskless
node feature.
I've three nodes, A (perf1) and B (perf2) with a disk, C (perf3) without a
disk.
Most of the time, the setup is behaving like expected. But in the following
scenario, I get two primaries:
1. A is pri
