Hope this helps...
My building issues were solved already, once I reverted to longterm 5.4,
as I stated in my answer to Yannis in this very thread.
In my answer to Christoph, I was rather contradicting the fact that
Coccinelle could be avoided in case of supported kernels. And yes, I
also
Hi Gianni,
> Seems to be working fine here, but I'm using the tarballs from linbit
> web page (download section) instead of using git, perhaps that makes a
> difference ?
Yes. It seems. I choose the wrong way...
Now I use the Proxmox depot (lazy mode :)
Thanks for testing.
--
Stéphane
Seems to be working fine here, but I'm using the tarballs from linbit web
page (download section) instead of using git, perhaps that makes a
difference ?
root@debian10:~# uname -r
4.19.0-13-amd64
DRBDADM_BUILDTAG=GIT-hash:\ fa9b9d3823b6e1792919e711fcf6164cac629290\
build\ by\ root@debian10\,\
> Hmm interesting. It would help to know how to find out about the exact and
> ideal version. It must be available somewhere, right? Having this version
> at the top of the table you've shared above (and even as number 1 supported
> kernel) would seem logical to me. And it would be great if
> ubuntu-focal-amd64 | ✗ 5.4.0-51; ✗ 5.4.0-52; 5.4.0-48; 5.4.0-53;
> 5.4.0-54; 5.4.0-56; 5.4.0-26
[...]
> Using one of these kernels will give you the smoothest experience when
> building DRBD. We actually pre-compute all compat patches for these
> kernels and put them in our release
> I tested building on 5.8.0-31-generic (Ubuntu Focal) and I'm getting the
> same error as you do, so I'd assume that drbd cannot build against that
> kernel at the moment.
> I have reverted back to 5.4.0-48-generic which seems to be ok.
Thank you! That's some kind of a workaround, but it
On 10/12/2020 12:07, Christoph Böhmwalder wrote:
Hi Pierre,
As much as we may want it, DRBD's coccinelle-based compat system is not
a general purpose solution. We can't guarantee that DRBD will build for
any given kernel – there is simply too much going on in the block layer
and other parts
Thanks Christoph for the very clear explanation, I think that it was a
piece which was missing for all of us!
B.R.
Yannis
On Thu, 10 Dec 2020 at 12:07, Christoph Böhmwalder <
christoph.boehmwal...@linbit.com> wrote:
> Hi Pierre,
>
> As much as we may want it, DRBD's coccinelle-based compat
Hi Pierre,
As much as we may want it, DRBD's coccinelle-based compat system is not
a general purpose solution. We can't guarantee that DRBD will build for
any given kernel – there is simply too much going on in the block layer
and other parts of the kernel, so that we cannnot possibly cover
I tested building on 5.8.0-31-generic (Ubuntu Focal) and I'm getting the
same error as you do, so I'd assume that drbd cannot build against that
kernel at the moment.
I have reverted back to 5.4.0-48-generic which seems to be ok.
On Thu, 10 Dec 2020 at 05:59, Pierre-Philipp Braun
wrote:
> Hey.
Hello
I am having troubles building the v9 module although I tried with various
releases and against many kernel versions.
With branch drbd-9.0 and drbd-9.0.26-0rc2 against stock Ubuntu 5.8.0-31-generic
In file included from /root/tp/drbd/drbd/drbd_main.c:19:
./include/linux/vermagic.h:6:2:
11 matches
Mail list logo
