On 30 Jul 2014, at 14:39, Lars Ellenberg wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 12:09:51PM +0200, Bart Coninckx wrote:
>> Not sure how the output is supposed to look like, but what I have now
>> seems readable and provides quite some info. Does anyone can give me
>> pointers on what to look for? Where
On 30 Jul 2014, at 14:39, Lars Ellenberg wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 12:09:51PM +0200, Bart Coninckx wrote:
>> Not sure how the output is supposed to look like, but what I have now
>> seems readable and provides quite some info. Does anyone can give me
>> pointers on what to look for? Where
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 12:09:51PM +0200, Bart Coninckx wrote:
> Not sure how the output is supposed to look like, but what I have now
> seems readable and provides quite some info. Does anyone can give me
> pointers on what to look for? Where can one determine what is the
> offending process?
You
Am 29.07.2014 11:37, schrieb Bart Coninckx:
> That is what I actually did at first but I had no output getting to the
> redirected file,
Depending on how broken your disto's netcat is, socat often does a better job.
i.e. socat udp-recv:PORT -
Thanks,
//richard
> BC
>
>
>
> On 29 Jul 2014, at
Not sure how the output is supposed to look like, but what I have now seems
readable and provides quite some info. Does anyone can give me pointers on what
to look for? Where can one determine what is the offending process?
Cheers,
BC
On 29 Jul 2014, at 11:57, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>
That is what I actually did at first but I had no output getting to the
redirected file,
BC
On 29 Jul 2014, at 09:21, Richard Weinberger
wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 7:11 PM, Bart Coninckx
> wrote:
>>
>> On 18 Jul 2014, at 22:10, Bart Coninckx wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On 18 Jul 2014, at
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 7:11 PM, Bart Coninckx wrote:
>
> On 18 Jul 2014, at 22:10, Bart Coninckx wrote:
>
>>
>> On 18 Jul 2014, at 17:30, Lars Ellenberg wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 03:03:50PM +0200, Bart Coninckx wrote:
On 17 Jul 2014, at 17:07, Lars Ellenberg wrote:
>
On 18 Jul 2014, at 22:10, Bart Coninckx wrote:
>
> On 18 Jul 2014, at 17:30, Lars Ellenberg wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 03:03:50PM +0200, Bart Coninckx wrote:
>>>
>>> On 17 Jul 2014, at 17:07, Lars Ellenberg wrote:
>>>
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 04:04:51PM +0200, Bart Coninckx wr
On 18 Jul 2014, at 17:30, Lars Ellenberg wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 03:03:50PM +0200, Bart Coninckx wrote:
>>
>> On 17 Jul 2014, at 17:07, Lars Ellenberg wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 04:04:51PM +0200, Bart Coninckx wrote:
Hi all,
I seem to experience ra
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 03:03:50PM +0200, Bart Coninckx wrote:
>
> On 17 Jul 2014, at 17:07, Lars Ellenberg wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 04:04:51PM +0200, Bart Coninckx wrote:
> >>Hi all,
> >>
> >>
> >> I seem to experience random kernel panics on two CentOS 6.5 servers.
> >> These
On 17 Jul 2014, at 17:07, Lars Ellenberg wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 04:04:51PM +0200, Bart Coninckx wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>>
>> I seem to experience random kernel panics on two CentOS 6.5 servers.
>> These do not seem to happen when DRBD is stopped on one node. Both
>> servers have I
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 04:04:51PM +0200, Bart Coninckx wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
> I seem to experience random kernel panics on two CentOS 6.5 servers.
> These do not seem to happen when DRBD is stopped on one node. Both
> servers have Infiniband cards installed for the DRBD connections. I
> up
Hi all,
I seem to experience random kernel panics on two CentOS 6.5 servers. These do
not seem to happen when DRBD is stopped on one node. Both servers have
Infiniband cards installed for the DRBD connections. I upgraded the 8.4.4
installation to 8.4.5 to no avail.
Can someone provide
13 matches
Mail list logo
