.@lists.linbit.com] On Behalf Of Lonni J Friedman
> Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2012 6:02 PM
> To: drbd-user@lists.linbit.com
> Subject: [DRBD-user] very large out-of-sync (oos) value yet drbd-overview
> claims UpToDate/UpToDate
>
> I've got a drbd setup with 8.3.11. I ran a
Dan Barker
Cc: drbd-user@lists.linbit.com
Subject: Re: [DRBD-user] very large out-of-sync (oos) value yet drbd-overview
claims UpToDate/UpToDate
Thanks, that answers my 2nd question, but not my 1st question.
Shouldn't drbd-overview be treating this as a not UpToDate scenario?
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 6:08
...@lists.linbit.com
[mailto:drbd-user-boun...@lists.linbit.com] On Behalf Of Lonni J Friedman
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2012 6:02 PM
To: drbd-user@lists.linbit.com
Subject: [DRBD-user] very large out-of-sync (oos) value yet drbd-overview
claims UpToDate/UpToDate
I've got a drbd setup wit
I've got a drbd setup with 8.3.11. I ran a manual verify, and once it
completed it reported:
[23479.620066] block drbd0: Online verify done (total 23136 sec;
paused 0 sec; 73748 K/sec)
[23479.702176] block drbd0: Online verify found 9651098 4k block out of sync!
[23479.745988] block drbd0: conn(
