On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 03:05:33PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 10:05:50PM +, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 10:48:34AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 06:40:49PM +, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > > > There's lots of s
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 10:48:34AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 06:40:49PM +, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > There's lots of static devices, not only platform devices, in the ARM
> > tree. It's going to be a hell of a lot of work to fix this all up
> > properly.
>
> I
hi all:
I have a question:
If a BO in VRAM (WC) evict to SYS memory(may be cached), and user
process still can access it event it is in SYS memory (may be cached)
.
when this BO volidate to VRAM, It seems "ttm_bo_handle_move_mem" not
flush cache (If evict to SYS memory with cached).
But flus
Hi Linus,
lots of regression fixes, I delayed sending this until I tracked down why
37-rc wouldn't show anything on my newly acquired HP 2540p when 2.6.36
worked, some eDP changes to fix some Sony's regressed the HPs so we've just
reverted it and
hopefully jbarnes can work out what he did wro
6xx/7xx was hitting the wrong BUS_CNTL reg and bits.
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher
Cc: stable at kernel.org
---
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r600_reg.h|1 +
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_bios.c | 13 +++--
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/r
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 04:21:47PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 30 November 2010, Linus Walleij wrote:
> > 2010/11/26 Arnd Bergmann :
> >
> > > * When you say that the devices are static, I hope you do not mean
> > > static in the C language sense. We used to allow devices to be
> > >
On Tuesday 30 November 2010, Linus Walleij wrote:
> 2010/11/26 Arnd Bergmann :
>
> > * When you say that the devices are static, I hope you do not mean
> > static in the C language sense. We used to allow devices to be
> > declared as "static struct" and registered using
> > platform_device_reg
6xx/7xx was hitting the wrong BUS_CNTL reg and bits.
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher
Cc: sta...@kernel.org
---
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r600_reg.h|1 +
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_bios.c | 13 +++--
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rade
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 11:42:15PM +, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > It's a work in progress, but wherever possible, I encourage people to
> > not make 'struct device' static.
>
> Right, so saying to ARM developers that they can't submit code which
> adds new static device structures is r
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher
Cc: stable at kernel.org
---
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_connectors.c | 34
1 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_connectors.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_connectors.c
index 3
2010/11/26 Arnd Bergmann :
> * When you say that the devices are static, I hope you do not mean
> ?static in the C language sense. We used to allow devices to be
> ?declared as "static struct" and registered using
> ?platform_device_register (or other bus specific functions). This
> ?is no longer
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 10:05:50PM +, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 10:48:34AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 06:40:49PM +, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > > There's lots of static devices, not only platform devices, in the ARM
> > > tree.
Thomas Hellstrom writes:
> Ben,
>
> I'm looking at a way to make TTM memory management asynchronous with
> the CPU. The idea is that you should basically be able to DMA data to
> and from memory regions without waiting for idle, as long as the GPU
> has a means to provide operation ordering.
>
So
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher
Cc: sta...@kernel.org
---
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_connectors.c | 34
1 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_connectors.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_connectors.c
index 3bef
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25544
--- Comment #20 from Jared Clark 2010-11-30 11:30:02 PST ---
Thank you for your prompt comments. Since it looks like I am dealing with a
persistent bug on the R100, even using the latest from the xorg-edgers PPA and
the 2.6.37-rc3, I will submit
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25544
--- Comment #20 from Jared Clark 2010-11-30 11:30:02 PST
---
Thank you for your prompt comments. Since it looks like I am dealing with a
persistent bug on the R100, even using the latest from the xorg-edgers PPA and
the 2.6.37-rc3, I will submit
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 06:40:49PM +, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 04:21:47PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Tuesday 30 November 2010, Linus Walleij wrote:
> > > 2010/11/26 Arnd Bergmann :
> > >
> > > > * When you say that the devices are static, I hope you do
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25544
--- Comment #19 from Daniel Richard G. 2010-11-30 09:02:31
PST ---
(In reply to comment #17)
>
> The patch is not relevant to r100. If you are seeing the same symptom on
> r1xx,
> you are seeing a different issue. Please open a new bug and i
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25544
--- Comment #19 from Daniel Richard G. 2010-11-30
09:02:31 PST ---
(In reply to comment #17)
>
> The patch is not relevant to r100. If you are seeing the same symptom on
> r1xx,
> you are seeing a different issue. Please open a new bug and i
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25544
--- Comment #18 from Roland Scheidegger 2010-11-30
08:58:22 PST ---
(In reply to comment #17)
> (In reply to comment #16)
> > I would like to know how I can get this resolved as well. I am having all
> > the
> > same issues with a R100, I have
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25544
--- Comment #18 from Roland Scheidegger 2010-11-30
08:58:22 PST ---
(In reply to comment #17)
> (In reply to comment #16)
> > I would like to know how I can get this resolved as well. I am having all
> > the
> > same issues with a R100, I have
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 04:21:47PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 30 November 2010, Linus Walleij wrote:
> > 2010/11/26 Arnd Bergmann :
> >
> > > * When you say that the devices are static, I hope you do not mean
> > > static in the C language sense. We used to allow devices to be
> > >
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25544
--- Comment #17 from Alex Deucher 2010-11-30 08:35:02 PST ---
(In reply to comment #16)
> I would like to know how I can get this resolved as well. I am having all the
> same issues with a R100, I have tried running the latest kernel from Ubuntu
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25544
--- Comment #17 from Alex Deucher 2010-11-30 08:35:02 PST
---
(In reply to comment #16)
> I would like to know how I can get this resolved as well. I am having all the
> same issues with a R100, I have tried running the latest kernel from Ubuntu
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 04:21:47PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 30 November 2010, Linus Walleij wrote:
> > 2010/11/26 Arnd Bergmann :
> >
> > > * When you say that the devices are static, I hope you do not mean
> > > static in the C language sense. We used to allow devices to be
> > >
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25544
--- Comment #16 from jrod...@gmail.com 2010-11-30 08:04:23 PST ---
I would like to know how I can get this resolved as well. I am having all the
same issues with a R100, I have tried running the latest kernel from Ubuntu
reps. 2.6.37 rc3. I do not
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25544
--- Comment #16 from jrodder at gmail.com 2010-11-30 08:04:23 PST ---
I would like to know how I can get this resolved as well. I am having all the
same issues with a R100, I have tried running the latest kernel from Ubuntu
reps. 2.6.37 rc3. I do
On Tuesday 30 November 2010, Linus Walleij wrote:
> 2010/11/26 Arnd Bergmann :
>
> > * When you say that the devices are static, I hope you do not mean
> > static in the C language sense. We used to allow devices to be
> > declared as "static struct" and registered using
> > platform_device_reg
fixes:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23752
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher
Cc:stable at kernel.org
---
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_atombios.c | 16
1 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_atombios.c
b/drivers/g
29 matches
Mail list logo
