https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43835
--- Comment #46 from Jonathan Nieder 2012-01-26
10:18:08 PST ---
bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org wrote:
> Can you narrow down the packages and bisect? Unfortunately, I can't reproduce
> this on any of the 5xx cards I have access to.
If I
dangerball: intel_tris.c:128: intel_extend_inline: Assertion 'intel->prim.flush
== intel_flush_inline_primitive' failed.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28426
--- Comment #15 from Roger Luethi 2012-01-26 06:21:17 PST
---
(In reply to comment #14)
> I'm having the exact same problem and I'm using kernel 3.2 with a Radeon HD
> 4350 on Debian sid. I had it with 3.0 an 3.1 too. Right now I have a
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43835
--- Comment #45 from Alex Deucher 2012-01-26 05:59:43 PST
---
Can you narrow down the packages and bisect? Unfortunately, I can't reproduce
this on any of the 5xx cards I have access to.
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28426
Kain Arif changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45281
Bug #: 45281
Summary: [8xx] Assertion failure whilst running dangerball
Classification: Unclassified
Product: Mesa
Version: unspecified
Platform: Other
OS/Version: All
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 1:37 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 06:02:41PM +0100, Tomasz Stanislawski wrote:
>> Hi Sumit,
>>
>> On 12/26/2011 10:23 AM, Sumit Semwal wrote:
>> >This is the first step in defining a dma buffer sharing mechanism.
>> >
>> [snip]
>>
>> >+struct sg_table
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 7:16 PM, Alexandre Demers
wrote:
> I suppose I can stop bisecting kernel about this possible lock and close
> the bug then?
>
> --
> Alexandre Demers
Yes, unless the bug is something else as the error message could be
ignored and it wasn't
harmfull. ie even without that
Hi Sumit,
On Wednesday 25 January 2012 14:56:52 Semwal, Sumit wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 6:53 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > Hi Summit,
> >
> > Sorry for the late review. I know that this code is now in mainline, but
> > I still have a couple of comments. I'll send patches if you agree
t; dmi matching is case sensitive.
>
> - ajax
>
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20120126/2a55e107/attachment.htm>
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43835
--- Comment #44 from Camale?n 2012-01-25 23:41:02 PST
---
(In reply to comment #42)
> Ok, just to fill in the blanks: was this a regression? Was there a
> kernel or X or GNOME upgrade before which the system worked fine and
> after which it
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33376
Michel D?nzer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
> >
> > bunch of regression fixes since TTM rework and radeon initialisation,
> > modesetting fixes for Alex to fix some black screens on kms start type
> > issues, and two radeon ACPI fixes that make some laptops no oops on
> > startup.
>
> Does that include for the nvidia (?) suspend/resume
On Wed, 2012-01-25 at 15:33 +0100, Thomas Hellstrom wrote:
> On 01/25/2012 10:41 AM, Ben Skeggs wrote:
> >
> > My main concern is that we blindly and unnecessarily set up GPU bindings and
> > end up with unnecessary code in TTM, and furthermore that we communicate
> > that bad practice to future
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 6:31 PM, Linus Torvalds
wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 11:05 AM, Dave Airlie wrote:
>>
>> bunch of regression fixes since TTM rework and radeon initialisation,
>> modesetting fixes for Alex to fix some black screens on kms start type
>> issues, and two radeon ACPI fixes
Hi Sumit,
On Wednesday 25 January 2012 14:56:52 Semwal, Sumit wrote:
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 6:53 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
Hi Summit,
Sorry for the late review. I know that this code is now in mainline, but
I still have a couple of comments. I'll send patches if you agree with
Hello,
I attached the dmidecode on launchpad bug.
Here is what i have in dmidecode for the hp t5745.
System Information
Manufacturer: Hewlett-Packard
Product Name: hp t5745
Marc
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 11:32 AM, Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, 2012-01-17 at 17:31 +0100,
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28426
Kain Arif blackh...@octal40.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43835
--- Comment #45 from Alex Deucher ag...@yahoo.com 2012-01-26 05:59:43 PST ---
Can you narrow down the packages and bisect? Unfortunately, I can't reproduce
this on any of the 5xx cards I have access to.
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28426
--- Comment #15 from Roger Luethi r...@hellgate.ch 2012-01-26 06:21:17 PST ---
(In reply to comment #14)
I'm having the exact same problem and I'm using kernel 3.2 with a Radeon HD
4350 on Debian sid. I had it with 3.0 an 3.1 too. Right now I
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 7:16 PM, Alexandre Demers
alexandre.f.dem...@gmail.com wrote:
I suppose I can stop bisecting kernel about this possible lock and close
the bug then?
--
Alexandre Demers
Yes, unless the bug is something else as the error message could be
ignored and it wasn't
harmfull.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43835
--- Comment #46 from Jonathan Nieder jrnie...@gmail.com 2012-01-26 10:18:08
PST ---
bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org wrote:
Can you narrow down the packages and bisect? Unfortunately, I can't reproduce
this on any of the 5xx cards I have
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45281
Bug #: 45281
Summary: [8xx] Assertion failure whilst running dangerball
Classification: Unclassified
Product: Mesa
Version: unspecified
Platform: Other
OS/Version: All
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45290
Bug #: 45290
Summary: [bisected r200] fdo23670-drawpix_stencil fails and
crashes
Classification: Unclassified
Product: Mesa
Version: git
Platform: All
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45290
--- Comment #1 from Ian Romanick i...@freedesktop.org 2012-01-26 18:02:32 PST
---
It looks like the misrendering was (briefly!) fixed by b2596c3 and broken again
by f24e106 (two commits later).
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45291
Bug #: 45291
Summary: No video output via DisplayPort on Mobility HD 4670.
Classification: Unclassified
Product: DRI
Version: unspecified
Platform: x86-64 (AMD64)
OS/Version: All
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45291
--- Comment #1 from Jon Sturm jonimo...@gmail.com 2012-01-26 19:29:40 PST ---
Created attachment 56210
-- https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=56210
Xorg.0.log
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45292
Bug #: 45292
Summary: Compilation failure on d3d1x state tracker:
‘ID3D10Include’ has not been declared
Classification: Unclassified
Product: Mesa
Version: git
Hi, Dave.
Please pull from
git://git.infradead.org/users/kmpark/linux-samsung exynos-drm-fixes
the branch above is based on git repository below:
git://people.freedesktop.org/~airlied/linux.git
branch name: drm-fixes
commit-id:
29 matches
Mail list logo
