https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40790
--- Comment #18 from ojab 2012-08-18 14:45:07 UTC ---
Still the same on latest libdrm/mesa/xf86-video-ati & kernel-3.5.2
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53348
Yunrui Hu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hyrathb at gmail.com
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53348
--- Comment #2 from Yunrui Hu 2012-08-18 14:03:11 UTC ---
I can confirm this.
I suffer from the same problem with the same chip(i855).The terminal output and
dmesg show the same thing as Bruno's.
The only difference is the game.I don't know
Am Sonntag, den 12.08.2012, 14:22 -0700 schrieb Bernie Thompson:
> On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 3:34 AM, Thomas Meyer wrote:
> guilty driver is probably udl_fb.c
> any ideas?
>
>
> Hi Thomas,
Hi Bernie!
> We were seeing similar issues in udlfb (the original fbdev version of
> this
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 8:54 AM, Dave Airlie wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 8:28 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> On 08/17/2012 03:25 PM, Justin M. Forbes wrote:
>>
>>> for , we have verified cases on inteldrmfb, radeondrmfb, and
>>> cirrusdrmfb.
>>>
>>> This is the last message displayed before the
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 8:28 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 08/17/2012 03:25 PM, Justin M. Forbes wrote:
>
>> for , we have verified cases on inteldrmfb, radeondrmfb, and
>> cirrusdrmfb.
>>
>> This is the last message displayed before the system hangs. This seems
>> to be hitting a large number of
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4804
Matt Turner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53111
--- Comment #11 from Alexandre Demers
2012-08-18 05:09:01 UTC ---
Created attachment 65723
--> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=65723
apitrace
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
---
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53111
--- Comment #10 from Alexandre Demers
2012-08-18 05:08:00 UTC ---
Well, it seems running it through qapitrace doesn't lock. But running only this
single test in a terminal does.
One thing though: when using qapitrace and looking up state,
Hi Tomi,
On Friday 17 August 2012 14:42:31 Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-08-17 at 13:10 +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > What kind of directory structure do you have in mind ? Panels are already
> > isolated in drivers/video/panel/ so we could already ditch the panel-
> > prefix in
Hi Mauro,
On Friday 17 August 2012 19:03:47 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Em 17-08-2012 18:01, Sylwester Nawrocki escreveu:
> > On 08/15/2012 11:09 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> >> On Wednesday 15 August 2012 18:13:19 Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
> >>> On 08/15/2012 12:06 AM, Laurent Pinchart
Hi Laurent,
On 08/15/2012 11:09 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> On Wednesday 15 August 2012 18:13:19 Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
>> On 08/15/2012 12:06 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>>> On Tuesday 14 August 2012 18:37:23 Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
On 08/14/2012 03:04 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4804
Matt Turner matts...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53348
--- Comment #2 from Yunrui Hu hyra...@gmail.com 2012-08-18 14:03:11 UTC ---
I can confirm this.
I suffer from the same problem with the same chip(i855).The terminal output and
dmesg show the same thing as Bruno's.
The only difference is the
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53348
Yunrui Hu hyra...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hyra...@gmail.com
---
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40790
--- Comment #18 from ojab o...@ojab.ru 2012-08-18 14:45:07 UTC ---
Still the same on latest libdrm/mesa/xf86-video-ati kernel-3.5.2
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail
Hi Hans
I didnt catch this sentence in the documentation of the API It is
not possible to set part of an EDID, it is always all or nothing. .
Guess, I have to read the documentation thoroughly before making
assumptions. It makes my question irrelevant.
Best Regards
Soby Mathew
On Thu, Aug 16,
Hi Dave,
What is your opinion about this patch?
On 15 August 2012 01:27, Sascha Hauer s.ha...@pengutronix.de wrote:
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 05:12:22PM +0530, Sachin Kamat wrote:
In general what you suggested seems to be the right thing to do.
However in this particular case, making this
This series adds display switching support for Apple laptops. The first
two patches contain preparatory changes to vga_switcheroo, and the third
contains the changes to support display switching with the gmux.
While these patches will allow switching the display mux, most Macbook
owners will not
This callback is a no-op in nouveau, and the upcoming apple-gmux
switcheroo support won't require it either. Rather than forcing drivers
to stub it out, just make it optional and remove the callback from
nouveau.
Signed-off-by: Seth Forshee seth.fors...@canonical.com
---
vga_switcheroo assumes that the handler will be registered before the
last client, otherwise switching will not be enabled. Likewise it's
assumed that the handler will not be unregistered without at least one
client also being unregistered, otherwise switching will remain enabled
despite no longer
From: Andreas Heider andr...@meetr.de
Add support for the gmux display muxing functionality and register a mux
handler with vga_switcheroo.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Heider andr...@meetr.de
Signed-off-by: Seth Forshee seth.fors...@canonical.com
---
drivers/platform/x86/apple-gmux.c | 224
Hi Laurent,
On 08/15/2012 11:09 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
On Wednesday 15 August 2012 18:13:19 Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
On 08/15/2012 12:06 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
On Tuesday 14 August 2012 18:37:23 Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
On 08/14/2012 03:04 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
This
Em 17-08-2012 18:01, Sylwester Nawrocki escreveu:
Hi Laurent,
On 08/15/2012 11:09 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
On Wednesday 15 August 2012 18:13:19 Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
On 08/15/2012 12:06 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
On Tuesday 14 August 2012 18:37:23 Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
On
Am Sonntag, den 12.08.2012, 14:22 -0700 schrieb Bernie Thompson:
On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 3:34 AM, Thomas Meyer tho...@m3y3r.de wrote:
guilty driver is probably udl_fb.c
any ideas?
Hi Thomas,
Hi Bernie!
We were seeing similar issues in udlfb (the original fbdev version
MSAA is impossible without them.
Signed-off-by: Marek Olšák mar...@gmail.com
---
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r600_cs.c | 94 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r600d.h | 17 ++
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_drv.c |3 +-
26 matches
Mail list logo