from Fabio Pedretti ---
Is this still an issue?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20121208/5abd38b9/attachment-0
...
URL:
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20121208/4a773d09/attachment.html>
from Fabio Pedretti ---
Is this still an issue?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20121208/cfcac210/attachment.html>
...
URL:
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20121208/47e75d2a/attachment.html>
ttp://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20121208/02f57001/attachment.html>
are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20121208/216f3f67/attachment.html>
535?) chip, running a 32 bit Linux
3.6.9 kernel.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20121208/59d089c2/attachment.html>
On 08.12.2012, Chris Wilson wrote:
> One thing you can try is SNA, which packs its
> batches differently with the advantage that more auxiliary state is
> included in the error-state. It also packs all the kernels into a
> single buffer which will reduce the frequency at which it is paged
>
On 07.12.2012, Daniel Vetter wrote:
[]
I did a "git bisect" betweeb 3.6 and 3.7-rc8 and ended up with
this. Unfortunately, git can't revert this patch on top of master, sp
I have not been able to test if a revert will cure the problem.
After reading on the net that Peter (Lekensteyn)
configuration tool?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20121208/94f4e74f/attachment.html>
)
Just so that I can learn about the code.
Thanks,
Kunal
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20121208/f430b
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57982
--- Comment #3 from Michel Dänzer mic...@daenzer.net ---
To me this looks like it could be an Ubuntu Unity issue.
What is the otuput of xrandr when the problem occurs?
Does it also happen if you make the corresponding changes in the Unity /
On 07.12.2012, Daniel Vetter wrote:
[]
I did a git bisect betweeb 3.6 and 3.7-rc8 and ended up with
this. Unfortunately, git can't revert this patch on top of master, sp
I have not been able to test if a revert will cure the problem.
After reading on the net that Peter (Lekensteyn) already
On 08.12.2012, Chris Wilson wrote:
One thing you can try is SNA, which packs its
batches differently with the advantage that more auxiliary state is
included in the error-state. It also packs all the kernels into a
single buffer which will reduce the frequency at which it is paged
out/in.
On 2012-12-06 12:07, Grant Likely wrote:
On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 16:39:58 +0100, Steffen Trumtrar
s.trumt...@pengutronix.de wrote:
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 02:37:26PM +0200, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
On 2012-11-26 11:07, Steffen Trumtrar wrote:
+/*
+ * Subsystem independent description of a
drm/drm_edid.h was included twice.
Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat sachin.ka...@linaro.org
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_modes.c |1 -
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_modes.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_modes.c
index b00f1c8..49249bb
subdev/bar.h was included twice.
Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat sachin.ka...@linaro.org
---
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/engine/disp/nv50.c |1 -
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/engine/disp/nv50.c
From: Wei Yongjun yongjun_...@trendmicro.com.cn
In case of error, function arm_iommu_create_mapping() returns
ERR_PTR() and never returns NULL. The NULL test in the return
value check should be replaced with IS_ERR().
Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun yongjun_...@trendmicro.com.cn
---
Hi,
Am Montag, den 26.11.2012, 18:56 +0200 schrieb Tomi Valkeinen:
On 2012-11-26 18:10, Steffen Trumtrar wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 04:38:36PM +0200, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
+optional properties:
+ - hsync-active: hsync pulse is active low/high/ignored
+ - vsync-active:
Memory for _manager is allocated using kzalloc() but the result is not checked.
I was led to scrutinize ttm_page_alloc_init() from a smatch warning:
drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_page_alloc.c:799 ttm_page_alloc_init() error: potential
null dereference '_manager'. (kzalloc returns null)
Cc: David
smatch warning:
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c:7019 intel_set_mode() warn: function puts
500 bytes on stack
Refactor so that saved_mode and saved_hwmode are dynamically allocated as
opposed
to being automatic variables. 500 bytes seems like it could run the potential
for blowing
the
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58033
Priority: medium
Bug ID: 58033
Assignee: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Summary: [r300g] Black gap artifacts when playing WoW
Severity: normal
Classification: Unclassified
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58033
Chris Rankin ranki...@googlemail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|Drivers/DRI/r300
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58033
--- Comment #1 from Marek Olšák mar...@gmail.com ---
Try: RADEON_DEBUG=nozmask
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
dri-devel mailing list
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58033
--- Comment #2 from Marek Olšák mar...@gmail.com ---
Also try reverting the commit e866bd1adea2c3b4971ad68e69c6.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
dri-devel
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32131
Fabio Pedretti fabio@libero.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fabio@libero.it
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55919
--- Comment #10 from Roland Egger spar...@gmx.de ---
Why is it marked as resolved invalid?
Regards,
Roland
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
dri-devel
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40213
Fabio Pedretti fabio@libero.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fabio@libero.it
28 matches
Mail list logo
