https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=86891
--- Comment #12 from Alex Deucher ---
looks like https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=84500
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=86891
--- Comment #11 from Michael Mair-Keimberger ---
Created attachment 155841
--> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=155841=edit
dmesg output
Don't know if this helps but i just saw that i got strange (?) output in dmesg.
This output
.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20141029/b12bb0c0/attachment.html>
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=104145
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20141029/9cd30802/attachment.html>
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20141029/dc9f4468/attachment-0001.html>
it may be bug 81644. When you say crash
what do you mean? Segfault? System hang? GPU hang? GPU page fault?
Something else?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.free
ML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20141029/612b53a8/attachment.html>
and Llvm is from recent git.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20141029/ce0df673/attachment.html>
it might show AMD it's
worth it to get you guys more help over all.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20141
was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20141029/156c19dc/attachment.html>
es/dri-devel/attachments/20141029/78d64ebb/attachment.html>
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=83861
--- Comment #7 from Yomi ---
It would seem my particular issue is related to pulseaudio.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
--
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20141029/672b491a/attachment.html>
.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20141029/99cc4e21/attachment.html>
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=86891
--- Comment #10 from Michael Mair-Keimberger ---
(In reply to Michel Dänzer from comment #7)
> Does Mesa 10.3.2 work better, specifically commit
> 64c2bdc334ba472603b1e7cd2c3046cfbce285b6?
I'll get slightly better results with 10.3.2 (with
On Wed, 2014-10-29 at 09:54 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Oct 2014, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > On Tue, 2014-10-28 at 13:29 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> >> On 10/27/14 06:13, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> >> > I also think the 'depends on BACKLIGHT_CLASS_DEVICE ||
> >> >
are the assignee for the bug.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20141029/0e1f508d/attachment.html>
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71891
--- Comment #46 from Alex Deucher ---
The original issue reported was fixed. Please file a new bug if you are having
an issue.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
occur?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20141029/9ac6d2cf/attachment.html>
--
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20141029/aa43cc11/attachment.html>
...
URL:
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20141029/ee5c0b05/attachment.html>
The calculation of "num_shader_engines" has a precedence bug because
the right shift happens before the mask, but this variable is never used
so we can just delete it.
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/evergreen.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/evergreen.c
index
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71891
J changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||joerg.schaible at gmx.de
--- Comment #45 from J ---
On 28.10.2014 19:32, Christian König wrote:
> Am 28.10.2014 um 10:28 schrieb Michel Dänzer:
>> From: Michel Dänzer
>>
>> It was adding a second placement for the second 256MB segment of VRAM,
>> which is not a good idea for several reasons:
>>
>> * It fills up the first 256MB segment (which is
because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20141029/1f0920d5/attachment.html>
nature of the issue you
are seeing.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20141029/f2faacea/attachment.html>
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=86891
--- Comment #9 from Alex Deucher ---
(In reply to Dieter Nützel from comment #8)
>
> Yes, looks much better, but the code shouldn't touch any relevant
> (radeonsi/r600g) code paths. - Michel?
>
> On r600g (RV730 AGP) I do NOT see any (real)
--
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20141029/0d9e2d8e/attachment.html>
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=86891
--- Comment #8 from Dieter Nützel ---
(In reply to Michael Mair-Keimberger from comment #6)
> (In reply to Dieter Nützel from comment #5)
> > Can you please test with one of kernel git | 3.18-rc2 | drm-next together
> > with
> > git revert
From: Dave Airlie
Ivybridge + 30" monitor prints a drm error on every modeset, since
IVB doesn't support DP3 we should even bother trying to use it.
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter (on irc)
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 4 +++-
1 file
signee for the bug.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20141029/6a564b17/attachment-0001.html>
are actually multiple issues that are now all mixed up.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20141029/8cb04d56/attachment.html>
and find which one I need to be
living in for bug reports again. :)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20141029/7c759
Previously the panel and output were only enabled on encoder->dpms(). If
userspace called dpms on before doing a modeset, the driver would get into
a state where the connector had a dpms state of ON, but the encoder and output
were not enabled (because the encoder is not yet attached to the
nts/20141029/8c1cc2d3/attachment.html>
.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20141029/8f958ca1/attachment.html>
DP_EDP_REV 0x700
And this belongs further down, so it properly sorts into the list of
registers.
Thierry
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20141029/2822532e/attachment-0001.sig>
On Tue, 2014-10-28 at 13:29 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 10/27/14 06:13, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> > I also think the 'depends on BACKLIGHT_CLASS_DEVICE ||
> > BACKLIGHT_CLASS_DEVICE=n' pattern is quite... interesting (i.e. sounds
> > like a hack to me =).
>
> It does exactly what is needed and
an explicit Acked-by anyway.
Thierry
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20141029/7298afe0/attachment.sig>
rg/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20141029/33b83cae/attachment-0001.html>
or crash. Maybe this is related to the other llvm change?
I attached a log.
Thanks,
sarnex
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 11:47 AM, Dan Carpenter
wrote:
> The calculation of "num_shader_engines" has a precedence bug because
> the right shift happens before the mask, but this variable is never used
> so we can just delete it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter
Applied in preference to Joe
On 28.10.2014 23:06, Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 10:14 AM, Joe Perches wrote:
>> Precedence of & and >> is not the same and is not left to right.
>> shift has higher precedence and should be done after the mask.
>>
>> Add parentheses around the mask.
>>
>> Use the already
On Di, 2014-10-28 at 17:04 +, Zachary Reizner wrote:
> revision bump would be needed when adding a new interface (not
> present
> in real hardware) to allow for larger pitches, so you could
> use 32bpp
> with the default (1024x768) resolution.
> I did
are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20141029/7519777f/attachment.html>
because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20141029/8df4725d/attachment.html>
because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20141029/729f489b/attachment.html>
because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20141029/2eb7b14f/attachment.html>
could be checked with the radeon_info ioctl.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20141029/507dd7f8/attachment-0001.html>
On Wed, 29 Oct 2014, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 10:23:50AM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> On Wed, 29 Oct 2014, Ville Syrjälä
>> wrote:
>> > On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 05:02:50PM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
>> >> From: Dave Airlie
>> >>
>> >> Ivybridge + 30" monitor prints a
This patch allows framebuffers for cirrus to be created with
32bpp pixel formats provided that they do not violate certain
restrictions of the cirrus hardware.
v2: Use pci resource length for vram size.
Signed-off-by: Zach Reizner
---
drivers/gpu/drm/cirrus/cirrus_drv.h | 3 +++
Krzysztof Kozlowski writes:
> When resuming the system the power domain has to be powered on early so
> any runtime PM aware devices could resume.
>
> This fixes following scenario reproduced on Exynos DRM:
> 1. Power domain is off before suspending the system.
> 2. System is suspended to RAM.
>
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 10:23:50AM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Oct 2014, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 05:02:50PM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
> >> From: Dave Airlie
> >>
> >> Ivybridge + 30" monitor prints a drm error on every modeset, since
> >> IVB doesn't
he bug.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20141029/e86e42d9/attachment.html>
he bug.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20141029/c05e9048/attachment.html>
On Wed, 29 Oct 2014, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 05:02:50PM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
>> From: Dave Airlie
>>
>> Ivybridge + 30" monitor prints a drm error on every modeset, since
>> IVB doesn't support DP3 we should even bother trying to use it.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Daniel
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 10:15:01AM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 05:02:50PM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
> > From: Dave Airlie
> >
> > Ivybridge + 30" monitor prints a drm error on every modeset, since
> > IVB doesn't support DP3 we should even bother trying to use it.
> >
ing all these low-level details
> into drm core structures can't we just have a generic hashtable/list for
> this, plus some static inline helpers that cast the void * you get into
> the one you want?
>
> I also get the feeling that this really should be in the driver core (like
> the component helpers), and that we should think a lot harder about
> lifetimes and refcounting (see my other reply on that).
Yes, that sounds very useful indeed. Also see my reply to yours. =)
Thierry
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20141029/6ea7a4ff/attachment.sig>
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 05:02:50PM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
> From: Dave Airlie
>
> Ivybridge + 30" monitor prints a drm error on every modeset, since
> IVB doesn't support DP3 we should even bother trying to use it.
>
> Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter (on irc)
> Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie
> ---
try_module_get(record->owner);
...
}
struct registry_record *registry_find_by_of_node(struct registry
*registry,
struct device_node *np)
{
...
kref_get(...);
...
}
That way it should be possible to embed these into other structures,
like so:
struct drm_panel {
struct registry_record record;
...
};
static struct registry drm_panels;
int drm_panel_add(struct drm_panel *panel)
{
return registry_add(_panels, >record);
}
struct drm_panel *of_drm_panel_find(struct device_node *np)
{
struct registry_record *record;
record = registry_find_by_of_node(_panels, np);
return container_of(record, struct drm_panel, record);
}
Is that what you had in mind?
Thierry
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20141029/9de7c54d/attachment-0001.sig>
I've forgotten to do this in:
commit cb597bb3a2fbfc871cc1c703fb330d247bd21394
Author: Daniel Vetter
Date: Sun Jul 27 19:09:33 2014 +0200
drm: trylock modest locking for fbdev panics
Oops, fix this asap.
In my defense kerneldoc is really awful and there's no way it can pick
up structured
I've tried to cc all the people who have recently added new stuff
but forgotten to update documentation.
I've also decided not to bother documenting the massive property list
in struct drm_mode_config. If that beast keeps on growing we might want
to extract it into a separate structure which we
While writing atomic docs I've noticed that I don't get any errors
for my screw-ups in drm_crtc.h. Fix this immediately.
This just does the bare minimum to get starts, lots of stuff isn't
properly documented yet unfortunately.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter
---
Documentation/DocBook/drm.tmpl |
Just a bit of OCD cleanup on headers - this function isn't the core
interface any more but just a helper for drivers who haven't yet
transitioned to universal planes. Put the declaration at the right
spot and sprinkle necessary #includes over all drivers.
Maybe this helps to encourage driver
On 10/29/2014 08:58 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 04:05:34PM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 08:16:44PM +0530, Ajay kumar wrote:
>>> On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 8:11 PM, Thierry Reding
>>> wrote:
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 03:19:36PM +0100, Daniel Vetter
+0900
radeon/llvm: Dynamically allocate branch/loop stack arrays
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20141029/3c9f4
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 09:38:23AM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 08:43:14AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 03:35:50PM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > > On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 11:26:30PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at
On Wed, 29 Oct 2014, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-10-28 at 13:29 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> On 10/27/14 06:13, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
>> > I also think the 'depends on BACKLIGHT_CLASS_DEVICE ||
>> > BACKLIGHT_CLASS_DEVICE=n' pattern is quite... interesting (i.e. sounds
>> > like a
st mutex the panel/bridge can go away.
>
> Yes usually you don't unload a driver on a soc but soc isn't everything
> and designing new stuff to not be hotunplug save isn't great either.
Yeah, I certainly agree that adding proper reference counting would be a
good thing. I think perhaps we could just take a reference on the struct
device * to prevent it from disappearing.
Although perhaps I misunderstand what you mean by "go away".
Thierry
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20141029/16e89f9b/attachment.sig>
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 04:56:03PM +, Daniel Stone wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 17 October 2014 01:36, Jiang, Fei wrote:
>
> > Thanks for Emil's suggestion. You are right, we need make sure structure
> > size aligned on 8 bytes, which is important for 32bit-64bit compatible case.
>
>
> While
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 04:05:34PM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 08:16:44PM +0530, Ajay kumar wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 8:11 PM, Thierry Reding
> > wrote:
> > > On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 03:19:36PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > >> On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 1:28 PM,
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 03:29:47PM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 11:20:31PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 8:58 PM, Sean Paul wrote:
> > >>> @@ -660,8 +662,11 @@ struct drm_bridge_funcs {
> > >>> * @driver_private: pointer to the bridge driver's
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=86891
Michel Dänzer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||curaga at operamail.com
--- Comment #7
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20141029/20421b0c/attachment.html>
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 03:35:50PM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 11:26:30PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 11:20 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 8:58 PM, Sean Paul
> > > wrote:
> > @@ -660,8 +662,11 @@ struct
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 05:06:01PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Oct 2014, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have had some problems with crashes involving suspend-to-disk after
> > updating to v3.16.
> >
> > Below is a log with 3.16.6 from a failed suspend attempt after which I
> >
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 05:02:50PM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
> From: Dave Airlie
>
> Ivybridge + 30" monitor prints a drm error on every modeset, since
> IVB doesn't support DP3 we should even bother trying to use it.
>
> Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter (on irc)
> Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie
This
next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20141029/9ba7260e/attachment.html>
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 10:11:25AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> Just a bit of OCD cleanup on headers - this function isn't the core
> interface any more but just a helper for drivers who haven't yet
> transitioned to universal planes. Put the declaration at the right
> spot and sprinkle necessary
mil
>>
___
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org<mailto:dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org>
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20141029/abc06763/attachment.html>
because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20141029/c0746245/attachment.html>
. Benchmarks like glmark2 are fine,
but in-game performance is just bad.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20141
ttp://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20141029/28dee80c/attachment.html>
vel/attachments/20141029/fb31afff/attachment.html>
ext part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20141029/9aa1b090/attachment-0001.html>
ore information.
Thanks,
sarnex
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20141029/694cee2a/attachment.html>
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=85421
--- Comment #9 from Hin-Tak Leung ---
FWIW, I am glad I haven't had a lock up since the last time I wrote (over two
weeks ago). FWIW, all the patches I mentioned in comment 1 except two are
integrated and therefore dropped with my current kernel
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=85526
--- Comment #17 from Hamish Wilson ---
(In reply to Michel Dänzer from comment #16)
> Can you try a 64-bit kernel? Does it happen with that as well?
Booting into the exact same kernel for 64-bit does indeed make the problems go
away for me.
88 matches
Mail list logo