On 03/10/15 16:19, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> dma_set_mask already checks for a supported DMA mask before updating it,
> the call to dma_supported is redundant.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig
Acked-by: Bert Kenward
The information contained in this message is confidential and
Hello. Late to the party...
On Monday December 2 2013 at 21:05, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 08:57:20PM +0100, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> > In general, this looks good to me as a starter, so we could have support
> > for DSI bus merged. IMHO we should consider adding some generic bus
On 11/18/2013 11:22, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 03:04:19PM +0000, Bert Kenward wrote:
> > #define DSI_WINDOW_VFP (1 << 0)
> > #define DSI_WINDOW_ACT (1 << 1)
> > #define DSI_WINDOW_VBP (1 << 2)
> > #define DSI_WINDOW_VSY (1
ode.
They're little used, but a mechanism for sending triggers should be included.
They're probably sufficiently different that it should be a different op.
All the best,
Bert.
--
Bert Kenward
Software Engineer
Broadcom Mobile Platform Solutions
Cambridge, UK
ed to be flagged as requiring
synchronisation with a tearing effect control signal - either the inband
method or a dedicated line. I suspect many hardware implementations will have
a specific method for transferring pixel data in a DSI command mode transfer.
The command sending period during vide
