somewhere?
Also,
a new file, arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/cc_platform.c, has been
created for powerpc to hold the out of line function.
Cc: Andi Kleen
Cc: Andy Lutomirski
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel
Cc: Baoquan He
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt
Cc: Borislav Petkov
Cc: Christian Borntraeger
Cc: Daniel Vetter
of s390 (pin_guest_page in vsie.c
which calls gfn_to_page).
FWIW, the current API is really hard to follow as it does not tell
which functions take a reference and which dont.
Anyway, this patch (with cc stable?)
Reviewed-by: Christian Borntraeger
out:
pte_unmap_unlock(ptep, ptl
-off-by: Nicholas Piggin
I guess this would be the small fix for stable? Do we want to add that cc?
Reviewed-by: Christian Borntraeger
---
virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 19 +--
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
On 26.04.21 19:42, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 06:43:14PM +0200, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
On 24.04.21 01:02, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
Prologue
This is series #3 in part of a larger work that arose from the minor
remark that the mdev_parent_ops indirection shim
On 24.04.21 01:02, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
Prologue
This is series #3 in part of a larger work that arose from the minor
remark that the mdev_parent_ops indirection shim is useless and
complicates things.
It applies on top of Alex's current tree and requires the prior two
series.
; - __builtin_return_address(0));
> + return (unsigned long)__vmalloc_node(THREAD_SIZE, THREAD_SIZE,
> + THREADINFO_GFP, NUMA_NO_NODE,
> + __builtin_return_address(0));
Looks sane.
Acked-by: Chri
On 08.04.20 13:59, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> alloc_vm_stack can use a slightly higher level vmalloc function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig
> ---
> arch/powerpc/kernel/irq.c | 5 ++---
wrong subject (power vs s390)
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git
Also add David and dri list.
Short summary, suspend/resume breaks with virtio-gpu as there are no
freeze/restore callbacks
that put the device back into working state.
On 03/13/2018 02:32 PM, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>
>
> On 03/13/2018 01:41 PM, Christian Borntraeger wrote
On 02/19/2018 02:35 PM, Farhan Ali wrote:
>
>
> On 02/15/2018 07:02 AM, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 02/15/2018 12:57 PM, Thomas Huth wrote:
>>> On 15.02.2018 12:26, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>>>> Hi Christian,
>>>>
On 02/15/2018 12:57 PM, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 15.02.2018 12:26, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> Hi Christian,
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 12:14 PM, Christian Borntraeger
>> <borntrae...@de.ibm.com> wrote:
>>> To enable the virtual terminal layer with vi
On 02/15/2018 12:26 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Christian,
>
> On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 12:14 PM, Christian Borntraeger
> <borntrae...@de.ibm.com> wrote:
>> To enable the virtual terminal layer with virtio-gpu, we need to
>> provide the dummy console.
To enable the virtual terminal layer with virtio-gpu, we need to
provide the dummy console. This console is hidden behind CONFIG_IOMEM
via the graphics support. Instead of fully enabling the graphic
drivers lets just provide a Kconfig option for the dummy console.
Signed-off-by: Christian
An even simpler approach would be:
diff --git a/arch/s390/Kconfig b/arch/s390/Kconfig
index cbe1d978693a..35b7aba4b6a0 100644
--- a/arch/s390/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/s390/Kconfig
@@ -952,6 +952,10 @@ config S390_HYPFS_FS
source "arch/s390/kvm/Kconfig"
+config DUMMY_CONSOLE
+ bool
+
On 02/08/2018 02:11 PM, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> [ dri-devel ML & arch/[score,um] Maintainers added to Cc: ]
>
> On Friday, February 02, 2018 08:59:57 AM Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>> On 02/01/2018 07:41 PM, Farhan Ali wrote:
>>> The
.
On 02/08/2018 02:11 PM, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> [ dri-devel ML & arch/[score,um] Maintainers added to Cc: ]
>
> On Friday, February 02, 2018 08:59:57 AM Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>> On 02/01/2018 07:41 PM, Farhan Ali wrote:
>>> The
On 02/08/2018 02:11 PM, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> [ dri-devel ML & arch/[score,um] Maintainers added to Cc: ]
>
> On Friday, February 02, 2018 08:59:57 AM Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>> On 02/01/2018 07:41 PM, Farhan Ali wrote:
>>> The
Am 12.01.2011 14:45, schrieb James Simmons:
>> I tested the revert: the boot screen did change the resolution
>> (without it don't), but my PC still hangs. (using an nvidia 8800GT).
>
> Try my most recent patch. Where does it hang at? Any logs?
FYI, I just want to mention that with the latest
Am 12.01.2011 14:32, schrieb James Simmons:
> Okay. The nouveau driver also uses the pitch as well. It
> really should be using the pitch field from drm_framebuffer instead of the
> line_length from fb_fix_screeninfo. This patch is just to make sure this
> is the issue. I will submit another
Am 12.01.2011 13:49, schrieb James Simmons:
> I see the problem. Nouveau for some hardware does a accelerated
> clearing of the screen before we register the framebuffer. The above patch
> does fix a real issue so please don't revert it. Can you try this patch.
>
> diff --git
Am 12.01.2011 00:28, schrieb Linus Torvalds:
> On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 3:20 PM, Christian Borntraeger
> wrote:
>>
>> Now nouveau framebuffer is completely broken on my T61p (01:00.0 VGA
>> compatible controller: nVidia Corporation G84M [Quadro FX 570M] (rev a1))
>>
Am 10.01.2011 23:59, schrieb Dave Airlie:
>
> Hi Linus,
>
> non-drm changes:
> one kref change we needed that went on list with no comments
>
> New hardware:
> radeon: add support for Fusion APUs and Radeon HD6xxx chipsets
> nouveau: Fermi acceleration support (requires external fw for now)
>
Am 12.01.2011 00:28, schrieb Linus Torvalds:
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 3:20 PM, Christian Borntraeger
borntrae...@de.ibm.com wrote:
Now nouveau framebuffer is completely broken on my T61p (01:00.0 VGA
compatible controller: nVidia Corporation G84M [Quadro FX 570M] (rev a1))
During startup
Am 12.01.2011 14:45, schrieb James Simmons:
I tested the revert: the boot screen did change the resolution
(without it don't), but my PC still hangs. (using an nvidia 8800GT).
Try my most recent patch. Where does it hang at? Any logs?
FYI, I just want to mention that with the latest git+the
Am 10.01.2011 23:59, schrieb Dave Airlie:
Hi Linus,
non-drm changes:
one kref change we needed that went on list with no comments
New hardware:
radeon: add support for Fusion APUs and Radeon HD6xxx chipsets
nouveau: Fermi acceleration support (requires external fw for now)
24 matches
Mail list logo
