Re: [RFC 0/9] nuclear pageflip

2012-09-12 Thread Clark, Rob
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 12:27 PM, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 10:48:16AM -0500, Rob Clark wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 10:32 AM, Ville Syrjälä >> wrote: >> > On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 10:23:48AM -0500, Rob Clark wrote: >> >> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 10:12 AM, Ville Syrjälä >>

[RFC 0/9] nuclear pageflip

2012-09-12 Thread Clark, Rob
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 12:27 PM, Ville Syrj?l? wrote: > On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 10:48:16AM -0500, Rob Clark wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 10:32 AM, Ville Syrj?l? >> wrote: >> > On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 10:23:48AM -0500, Rob Clark wrote: >> >> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 10:12 AM, Ville Syrj?l? >>

[RFC] ASoC: snd_soc_jack for HDMI audio: does it make sense?

2012-08-21 Thread Clark, Rob
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 1:01 AM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > On Mon, 2012-08-20 at 20:47 -0500, Ricardo Neri wrote: >> Hello! >> >> I have been working on prototypes for the ASoC OMAP HDMI audio driver to >> propagate events from the HDMI output (e.g., display getting >> enabled/disabled/suspended).

Re: [RFC] ASoC: snd_soc_jack for HDMI audio: does it make sense?

2012-08-21 Thread Clark, Rob
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 1:01 AM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > On Mon, 2012-08-20 at 20:47 -0500, Ricardo Neri wrote: >> Hello! >> >> I have been working on prototypes for the ASoC OMAP HDMI audio driver to >> propagate events from the HDMI output (e.g., display getting >> enabled/disabled/suspended). T

Re: [Linaro-mm-sig] [RFC] Synchronizing access to buffers shared with dma-buf between drivers/devices

2012-06-10 Thread Clark, Rob
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 3:56 PM, Erik Gilling wrote: >> I guess my other thought is that implicit vs explicit is not >> mutually exclusive, though I'd guess there'd be interesting >> deadlocks to have to debug if both were in use _at the same >> time_. :-) > > I think this is an approach worth inve

[Linaro-mm-sig] [RFC] Synchronizing access to buffers shared with dma-buf between drivers/devices

2012-06-09 Thread Clark, Rob
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 3:56 PM, Erik Gilling wrote: >> I guess my other thought is that implicit vs explicit is not >> mutually exclusive, though I'd guess there'd be interesting >> deadlocks to have to debug if both were in use _at the same >> time_. :-) > > I think this is an approach worth inve

Re: [PATCH] omap2+: add drm device

2012-05-25 Thread Clark, Rob
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 12:01 AM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, 2012-05-23 at 15:08 -0500, Andy Gross wrote: >> Register OMAP DRM/KMS platform device.  DMM is split into a >> separate device using hwmod. >> >> Signed-off-by: Andy Gross > > > >> +static int __init omap_init_drm(void) >>

[PATCH] omap2+: add drm device

2012-05-24 Thread Clark, Rob
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 12:01 AM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, 2012-05-23 at 15:08 -0500, Andy Gross wrote: >> Register OMAP DRM/KMS platform device. ?DMM is split into a >> separate device using hwmod. >> >> Signed-off-by: Andy Gross > > > >> +static int __init omap_init_drm(void) >

[Linaro-mm-sig] [PATCH 3/3] dma_buf: Add documentation for the new cpu access support

2012-03-05 Thread Clark, Rob
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 6:23 PM, Sakari Ailus wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > Thanks for the patch. > > On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 04:36:01PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: >> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter >> --- >> ?Documentation/dma-buf-sharing.txt | ?102 >> +++- >> ?1 files ch

Re: [Linaro-mm-sig] [PATCH 3/3] dma_buf: Add documentation for the new cpu access support

2012-03-05 Thread Clark, Rob
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 6:23 PM, Sakari Ailus wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > Thanks for the patch. > > On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 04:36:01PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: >> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter >> --- >>  Documentation/dma-buf-sharing.txt |  102 >> +++- >>  1 files ch

Kernel Display and Video API Consolidation mini-summit at ELC 2012 - Notes

2012-02-22 Thread Clark, Rob
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 10:36 AM, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Wed, 22 Feb 2012 17:24:24 +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 04:03:21PM +, James Simmons wrote: >> > Fbcon scrolling at be painful at HD or better modes. Fbcon needs 3 >> > possible accels; copyarea, imageblit, an

Re: Kernel Display and Video API Consolidation mini-summit at ELC 2012 - Notes

2012-02-22 Thread Clark, Rob
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 10:36 AM, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Wed, 22 Feb 2012 17:24:24 +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 04:03:21PM +, James Simmons wrote: >> > Fbcon scrolling at be painful at HD or better modes. Fbcon needs 3 >> > possible accels; copyarea, imageblit, and

Re: Kernel Display and Video API Consolidation mini-summit at ELC 2012 - Notes

2012-02-19 Thread Clark, Rob
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 1:42 PM, Adam Jackson wrote: > On 2/16/12 6:25 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > >>   Helper functions will be implemented in the subsystems to convert >> between >>   that generic structure and the various subsystem-specific structures. > > > I guess.  I don't really see a rea

Kernel Display and Video API Consolidation mini-summit at ELC 2012 - Notes

2012-02-18 Thread Clark, Rob
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 1:42 PM, Adam Jackson wrote: > On 2/16/12 6:25 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > >> ? Helper functions will be implemented in the subsystems to convert >> between >> ? that generic structure and the various subsystem-specific structures. > > > I guess. ?I don't really see a rea

[RFC 1/2] dma-buf: Introduce dma buffer sharing mechanism

2011-11-08 Thread Clark, Rob
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 3:04 AM, Marek Szyprowski wrote: > Hello, > > I'm sorry for a late reply, but after Kernel Summit/ELC I have some comments. > > On Friday, October 14, 2011 5:35 PM Daniel Vetter wrote: > >> On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 12:00:58PM +0200, Tomasz Stanislawski wrote: >> > >+/** >> >

Re: [RFC 1/2] dma-buf: Introduce dma buffer sharing mechanism

2011-11-08 Thread Clark, Rob
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 3:04 AM, Marek Szyprowski wrote: > Hello, > > I'm sorry for a late reply, but after Kernel Summit/ELC I have some comments. > > On Friday, October 14, 2011 5:35 PM Daniel Vetter wrote: > >> On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 12:00:58PM +0200, Tomasz Stanislawski wrote: >> > >+/** >> >

Re: [RFC] drm: add overlays as first class KMS objects

2011-05-15 Thread Clark, Rob
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 8:02 PM, Jesse Barnes wrote: > On Fri, 13 May 2011 18:16:30 +0200 > Daniel Vetter wrote: > >> Hi Jesse, >> >> Discussion here in Budapest with v4l and embedded graphics folks was >> extremely fruitful. A few quick things to take away - I'll try to dig >> through all >> the

[RFC] drm: add overlays as first class KMS objects

2011-05-14 Thread Clark, Rob
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 8:02 PM, Jesse Barnes wrote: > On Fri, 13 May 2011 18:16:30 +0200 > Daniel Vetter wrote: > >> Hi Jesse, >> >> Discussion here in Budapest with v4l and embedded graphics folks was >> extremely fruitful. A few quick things to take away - I'll try to dig >> through all >> th

Re: [PATCH] i.MX23/28 framebuffer driver

2011-02-18 Thread Clark, Rob
I'm all for a more modular drm, although I think the framework of CRTCs, encoders, and connectors is a nice fit, at least for our hw. It would be nice to have a better way to expose overlays. And I'm still thinking about how/if GEM fits in with our various video and 2/3d accelerators. BR, -R On

[PATCH] i.MX23/28 framebuffer driver

2011-02-17 Thread Clark, Rob
I'm all for a more modular drm, although I think the framework of CRTCs, encoders, and connectors is a nice fit, at least for our hw. It would be nice to have a better way to expose overlays. And I'm still thinking about how/if GEM fits in with our various video and 2/3d accelerators. BR, -R On