yeah, that's probably cleaner (I guess it'll avoid the -*), but it should have
the same effect.
I'll make the change.
On Feb 1, 2012, at 12:43 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 15:25:20 -0800, Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
>
>> This fixes a failure i
On Feb 1, 2012, at 1:56 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 13:01:58 -0800, Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
>
>> yeah, that's probably cleaner (I guess it'll avoid the -*), but it should
>> have the same effect.
>>
> I get host_os=linux-gnu here
On Feb 1, 2012, at 1:56 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 13:01:58 -0800, Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
>
>> yeah, that's probably cleaner (I guess it'll avoid the -*), but it should
>> have the same effect.
>>
> I get host_os=linux-gnu here
yeah, that's probably cleaner (I guess it'll avoid the -*), but it should have
the same effect.
I'll make the change.
On Feb 1, 2012, at 12:43 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 15:25:20 -0800, Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
>
>> This fixes a failure i
On Jan 31, 2012, at 8:59 AM, Eric Anholt wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 15:25:20 -0800, Jeremy Huddleston
> wrote:
>> This fixes a failure in 'make check' found by the tinderbox when trying to
>> build this code on Linux/ppc. This code is only designed to run on
On Jan 31, 2012, at 8:59 AM, Eric Anholt wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 15:25:20 -0800, Jeremy Huddleston freedesktop.org> wrote:
>> This fixes a failure in 'make check' found by the tinderbox when trying to
>> build this code on Linux/ppc. This code is only designed
This fixes a failure in 'make check' found by the tinderbox when trying to
build this code on Linux/ppc. This code is only designed to run on
Intel platforms, so don't even bother building it if we're not in that set.
Found-by: Tinderbox
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Huddleston
--
This fixes a failure in 'make check' found by the tinderbox when trying to
build this code on Linux/ppc. This code is only designed to run on
Intel platforms, so don't even bother building it if we're not in that set.
Found-by: Tinderbox
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Huddleston
--
Ok, well I'll give it a shot then. I've dealt with enough autoconf to make a
decent first pass.
On Jan 29, 2012, at 04:16, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 04:30, Jeremy Huddleston
> wrote:
>> Maybe I'm missing something here...
>>
>>
Ok, well I'll give it a shot then. I've dealt with enough autoconf to make a
decent first pass.
On Jan 29, 2012, at 04:16, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 04:30, Jeremy Huddleston
> wrote:
>> Maybe I'm missing something here...
>>
>>
Maybe I'm missing something here...
Shouldn't I be able to build and test support for Intel even if I've got an
nVidia card in my box now? Or is this support for Intel CPUs rather than Intel
GPUs?
On Jan 28, 2012, at 17:55, Eric Anholt wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Jan 2012 12:5
ce189] intel: Add a regression test
program for intel_decode.c.
git bisect good ccbc40340b7b472939a90ae8afc0a82b358ce189
On Jan 7, 2012, at 11:22, Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
> This new libdrm fails 'make check' on tinderbox:
> http://tinderbox.x.org/builds/2012-01-07-0023/logs/libdr
Maybe I'm missing something here...
Shouldn't I be able to build and test support for Intel even if I've got an
nVidia card in my box now? Or is this support for Intel CPUs rather than Intel
GPUs?
On Jan 28, 2012, at 17:55, Eric Anholt wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Jan 2012 12:5
a regression test
program for intel_decode.c.
git bisect good ccbc40340b7b472939a90ae8afc0a82b358ce189
On Jan 7, 2012, at 11:22, Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
> This new libdrm fails 'make check' on tinderbox:
> http://tinderbox.x.org/builds/2012-01-07-0023/logs/libdrm/#check
>
> On Jan
Well that's a ppc box, so maybe endianness issues... ?
On Jan 7, 2012, at 6:49 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
> On Sat, 07 Jan 2012 11:22:52 -0800, Jeremy Huddleston
> wrote:
>> This new libdrm fails 'make check' on tinderbox:
>> http://tinderbox.x.org/builds/2012-01-0
Well that's a ppc box, so maybe endianness issues... ?
On Jan 7, 2012, at 6:49 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
> On Sat, 07 Jan 2012 11:22:52 -0800, Jeremy Huddleston
> wrote:
>> This new libdrm fails 'make check' on tinderbox:
>> http://tinderbox.x.org/builds/2012-01-0
This new libdrm fails 'make check' on tinderbox:
http://tinderbox.x.org/builds/2012-01-07-0023/logs/libdrm/#check
On Jan 6, 2012, at 8:54 AM, Eric Anholt wrote:
> Here's a new release, featuring updated i915_drm.h for gen7 transform
> feedback, and intel_decode.c as a library API instead of being
This new libdrm fails 'make check' on tinderbox:
http://tinderbox.x.org/builds/2012-01-07-0023/logs/libdrm/#check
On Jan 6, 2012, at 8:54 AM, Eric Anholt wrote:
> Here's a new release, featuring updated i915_drm.h for gen7 transform
> feedback, and intel_decode.c as a library API instead of being
18 matches
Mail list logo
