Re: [PATCH 00/17] drm/mgag200: Convert to atomic modesetting

2020-05-06 Thread John Donnelly
> On May 4, 2020, at 8:39 AM, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: > > Hi John > > Am 30.04.20 um 02:11 schrieb John Donnelly: >> On 4/29/20 9:32 AM, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: >>> This patchset converts mgag200 to atomic modesetting. It uses simple >>> KMS hel

Re: [PATCH 00/17] drm/mgag200: Convert to atomic modesetting

2020-05-05 Thread John Donnelly
> On May 4, 2020, at 8:39 AM, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: > > Hi John > > Am 30.04.20 um 02:11 schrieb John Donnelly: >> On 4/29/20 9:32 AM, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: >>> This patchset converts mgag200 to atomic modesetting. It uses simple >>> KMS hel

Re: [PATCH 00/17] drm/mgag200: Convert to atomic modesetting

2020-05-01 Thread John Donnelly
On 4/30/20 3:29 AM, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: Hi John Am 30.04.20 um 02:11 schrieb John Donnelly: On 4/29/20 9:32 AM, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: This patchset converts mgag200 to atomic modesetting. It uses simple KMS helpers and SHMEM. Patches 1 to 4 simplifies the driver before the conversion

re: [PATCH 00/17] drm/mgag200: Convert to atomic modesetting

2020-04-30 Thread John Donnelly
On 4/29/20 9:32 AM, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: This patchset converts mgag200 to atomic modesetting. It uses simple KMS helpers and SHMEM. Patches 1 to 4 simplifies the driver before the conversion. For example, the HW cursor is not usable with the way universal planes work. A few data structures

Re: BAD -- Patch "drm/mgag200: Flag all G200 SE A machines as broken wrt " has been added to the 5.4-stable tree

2019-12-23 Thread John Donnelly
ID nor the internal ID seem to hint towards the bug. All > affected machines have a PCI ID of 0x0522 (i.e., G200 SE A). It was > decided to flag all G200 SE A machines as broken. > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann > Acked-by: Gerd Hoffmann > Fixes: 1591fadf857c ("drm

Re: IGNORE -- Patch "drm/mgag200: Flag all G200 SE A machines as broken wrt " has been added to the 5.4-stable tree

2019-12-23 Thread John Donnelly
I discovered I was missing a commit when I merged . This series is fine . > On Dec 19, 2019, at 12:24 PM, John Donnelly > wrote: > > Hi > > I am having difficulties with this patch on : 5.4.2 variant ; The system is > not booting with these patches applied.

Re: [PATCH] drm/mgag200: Flag all G200 SE A machines as broken wrt

2019-12-06 Thread John Donnelly
ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, >> G200_SE_A | MGAG200_FLAG_HW_BUG_NO_STARTADD}, >> -{ PCI_VENDOR_ID_MATROX, 0x522, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, G200_SE_A >> }, > > Acked-by: Gerd Hoffmann Tested-by: John Donnelly This series of commits appear to resolve the display issue in 5

Re: FAILED - [PATCH v2 3/3] drm/mgag200: Add workaround for HW that does not support 'startadd'

2019-12-05 Thread John Donnelly
> On Dec 3, 2019, at 11:30 AM, John Donnelly wrote: > > > Hello Sasha and Thomas , > > > This particular patch has failed on one class of servers that has a slightly > different Sun Vendor. ID for the BMC video device: > > I will follow up with additional d

Re: [PATCH 3/4] drm/mgag200: Add workaround for HW that does not support 'startadd'

2019-12-03 Thread John Donnelly
the value of >>> the device's 'startadd' field correctly, which leads to incorrectly >>> displayed scanout buffers. Always placing the active scanout buffer >>> at offset 0 works around the problem. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann >>> Re

Re: FAILED - [PATCH v2 3/3] drm/mgag200: Add workaround for HW that does not support 'startadd'

2019-12-03 Thread John Donnelly
Hello Sasha and Thomas , This particular patch has failed on one class of servers that has a slightly different Sun Vendor. ID for the BMC video device: I will follow up with additional details in the review comments for the original message,. > On Nov 28, 2019, at 8:23 AM, Sasha

Bugzilla to Gitlabs migration - No email updates ?

2019-11-19 Thread John Donnelly
Does gitlab not generate email when a comment is added to a ticket ? ___ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

Re: Drm: mgag200. Video adapter issue with 5.4.0-rc3 ; no graphics

2019-11-13 Thread John Donnelly
> On Nov 13, 2019, at 2:06 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 6:42 PM John Donnelly > wrote: >> >> Hi Thomas: See below >> >>> On Nov 13, 2019, at 2:17 AM, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: >>> >>> Hi John >>> &

Re: Drm: mgag200. Video adapter issue with 5.4.0-rc3 ; no graphics

2019-11-13 Thread John Donnelly
> On Nov 13, 2019, at 11:42 AM, John Donnelly > wrote: > > Hi Thomas: See below > >> On Nov 13, 2019, at 2:17 AM, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: >> >> Hi John >> >> Am 12.11.19 um 20:13 schrieb John Donnelly: >>> >>> In shor

Re: Drm: mgag200. Video adapter issue with 5.4.0-rc3 ; no graphics

2019-11-13 Thread John Donnelly
Hi Thomas: See below > On Nov 13, 2019, at 2:17 AM, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: > > Hi John > > Am 12.11.19 um 20:13 schrieb John Donnelly: >> >> In short . I started with : >> >> git bisect start >> >> git bisect b

Re: Drm: mgag200. Video adapter issue with 5.4.0-rc3 ; no graphics

2019-11-12 Thread John Donnelly
> On Nov 11, 2019, at 9:57 AM, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: > > Hi John > > Am 08.11.19 um 19:07 schrieb John Donnelly: >> >> >>> On Nov 8, 2019, at 9:06 AM, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: >>> >>> Hi >>> >>> Am 08.11.19 um 1

Re: Drm: mgag200. Video adapter issue with 5.4.0-rc3 ; no graphics

2019-11-11 Thread John Donnelly
On 11/11/19 9:57 AM, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: Hi John Am 08.11.19 um 19:07 schrieb John Donnelly: On Nov 8, 2019, at 9:06 AM, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: Hi Am 08.11.19 um 13:55 schrieb John Donnelly: On Nov 8, 2019, at 1:46 AM, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: Hi John Am 07.11.19 um 23:14

Re: Drm: mgag200. Video adapter issue with 5.4.0-rc3 ; no graphics

2019-11-08 Thread John Donnelly
> On Nov 8, 2019, at 9:06 AM, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: > > Hi > > Am 08.11.19 um 13:55 schrieb John Donnelly: >> >> >>> On Nov 8, 2019, at 1:46 AM, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: >>> >>> Hi John >>> >>> Am 07.11.19 um 23

Re: Drm: mgag200. Video adapter issue with 5.4.0-rc3 ; no graphics

2019-11-07 Thread John Donnelly
> On Nov 7, 2019, at 10:13 AM, John Donnelly wrote: > > > >> On Nov 7, 2019, at 7:42 AM, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: >> >> Hi John >> >> Am 07.11.19 um 14:12 schrieb John Donnelly: >>> Hi Thomas ; Thank you for reaching out. >>

Re: Drm: mgag200. Video adapter issue with 5.4.0-rc3 ; no graphics

2019-11-07 Thread John Donnelly
> On Nov 7, 2019, at 7:42 AM, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: > > Hi John > > Am 07.11.19 um 14:12 schrieb John Donnelly: >> Hi Thomas ; Thank you for reaching out. >> >> See inline: >> >>> On Nov 7, 2019, at 1:54 AM, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:

Re: Drm: mgag200. Video adapter issue with 5.4.0-rc3 ; no graphics

2019-11-07 Thread John Donnelly
Hi Thomas ; Thank you for reaching out. See inline: > On Nov 7, 2019, at 1:54 AM, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: > > Hi John, > > apparently the vgaarb was not the problem. > > Am 07.11.19 um 03:29 schrieb John Donnelly: >> Hi, >> >> I am investigatin

Drm: mgag200. Video adapter issue with 5.4.0-rc3

2019-11-06 Thread John Donnelly
Hi, I am investigating an issue where we lose video activity when the display is switched from from “text mode” to “graphic mode” on a number of servers using this driver. This adapter is Server Engines integrated Remote Video Acceleration Subsystem (RVAS) is used primarily as remote

Drm: mgag200. Video adapter issue with 5.4.0-rc3 ; no graphics

2019-11-06 Thread John Donnelly
Hi, I am investigating an issue where we lose video activity when the display is switched from from “text mode” to “graphic mode” on a number of servers using this driver.Specifically starting the GNOME desktop. This adapter is Server Engines Integrated Remote Video Acceleration