Bug#622993: every 10s I get "[drm:drm_edid_block_valid] *ERROR* EDID checksum is invalid ..."

(Sorry if I'm spawning a very old thread here). After all this time I have been patching my kernels to workaround [0][1] [0] [1] Some time ago I found [2] and today I finally solved

Re: Bug#622993: every 10s I get [drm:drm_edid_block_valid] *ERROR* EDID checksum is invalid ...

. -- My favourite poem is the one that starts 'Thirty days hath September' because it actually tells you something. -- Groucho Marx Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer http://perezmeyer.com.ar/ http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: Bug#622993: every 10s I get [drm:drm_edid_block_valid] *ERROR* EDID checksum is invalid ...

un archivo en memoria, no usar) Textual de Martín El Ruso Ribelotta Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer http://perezmeyer.com.ar/ http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ dri-devel

Bug#622993: every 10s I get "[drm:drm_edid_block_valid] *ERROR* EDID checksum is invalid ..."

On Monday 02 May 2011 12:25:07 Alex Deucher wrote: [snip] > Can you bisect? I really don't know :-) Haven't done it before. On the other hand, I will surely not have time to do it until next sunday (if I have time next sunday). Sucks, yeah :-/ > I suspect the culprit is one of the patches

Bug#622993: every 10s I get "[drm:drm_edid_block_valid] *ERROR* EDID checksum is invalid ..."

On Lun 02 May 2011 11:23:48 Alex Deucher escribi?: [snip] > You might try the patch here: > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27708#c7 > > If you are using a DVI or HDMI port, some TV's don't properly update > their checksums for different ports if they have minor edid changes > for

Re: Bug#622993: every 10s I get [drm:drm_edid_block_valid] *ERROR* EDID checksum is invalid ...

, wich I suspect doesn't use nouveau, it must not be this last one. And at least in my case, my card was working with a 2.6.38 kernel without problems, except I am missing something here. Kinds regards, Lisandro. -- Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer http://perezmeyer.com.ar/ http

Re: Bug#622993: every 10s I get [drm:drm_edid_block_valid] *ERROR* EDID checksum is invalid ...

checksums? If so, I already tried it and worked fine. If you are talking about something else, please give me some link :-) But I'm no expert, and since this method tempers with your hardware, I'd recommend you to be cautious. OK! -- May the source be with you. Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer

Re: Bug#622993: every 10s I get [drm:drm_edid_block_valid] *ERROR* EDID checksum is invalid ...

are dumb and they'll sign anything' - like I did. Trent Reznor, Nine Inch Nails on http://contactmusic.com/ http://tinyurl.com/c2wda4 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer http://perezmeyer.com.ar/ http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Bug#622993: every 10s I get "[drm:drm_edid_block_valid] *ERROR* EDID checksum is invalid ..."

On Dom 01 May 2011 18:09:27 Thibaut Girka escribi?: [snip] > I'm not talking about ignoring broken EDIDs, but about actually fixing > them[1]. This is clearly not my problem. I have two monitors, both the same brand and model. One is connected to the VGA output and the other one on the DVI. No

Bug#622993: every 10s I get "[drm:drm_edid_block_valid] *ERROR* EDID checksum is invalid ..."

On Dom 01 May 2011 17:26:42 Thibaut Girka escribi?: [snip] > My bad, overlooked it since Stuart uses nouveau. However, it might be > related nonetheless (and might be a completely different issue as well). > Did your monitor fail right after an upgrade? Yes, but I failed to check the versions of

Bug#622993: every 10s I get "[drm:drm_edid_block_valid] *ERROR* EDID checksum is invalid ..."

On Dom 01 May 2011 16:40:39 Thibaut Girka escribi?: > [Sorry for the duplicate mail sent earlier to debian-kernel] > > This whole bug really looks like #615598. > This might be a bug in nouveau or in the kernel. > > Did the initial "breakage" of the screens occur with 2.6.38? > If so, you may