.probe() to be able to eventually drop .probe_new() from
struct i2c_driver.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König
FWIW:
Reviewed-by: Martyn Welch
---
Hello,
I didn't get feedback for (implicit) v1 that was sent with Message-Id:
<20230427175954.666464-1-u.kleine-koe...@pengutronix.de>
en initialized.
>
> Fix this by checking whether both the bridges are probed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zheyu Ma
Good catch!
Acked-by: Martyn Welch
Would be worth adding:
Fixes: 11632d4aa2b3 ("drm/bridge: megachips: Ensure both bridges are
probed before registration")
> ---
hes, tree found here:
https://gitlab.collabora.com/martyn/linux/-/tree/6a4cccf50ea793d9e608ccda13468f8645aff6ad
Tested-by: Martyn Welch
> Fixes: 9db35bb349a0e ("drm: lcdif: Add support for i.MX8MP LCDIF
> variant")
> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut
> Cc: Alexander Stein
> Cc
sted in combination with other patches, tree found here:
https://gitlab.collabora.com/martyn/linux/-/tree/6a4cccf50ea793d9e608ccda13468f8645aff6ad
Tested-by: Martyn Welch
> Tested-by: Alexander Stein
> Tested-by: Martyn Welch
> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut
> Cc: Alexander Stein
>
c: Peng Fan
> Cc: Robby Cai
> Cc: Sam Ravnborg
> Cc: Stefan Agner
Tested along with related patches, driving InnoLux G150XNE LVDS panel
attached to NXP i.MX 8M Plus EVK.
Tree: https://gitlab.collabora.com/martyn/linux/-/tree/imx8mp
Tested-by: Martyn Welch
> ---
> V2: - Drop the pit
4.814279] r10:0000 r9: r8: r7: r6:0000
r5:801499a8
[4.822120] r4:817efa40
[4.824664] Code: e3a02080 e593001c e3a01d33 e3a05000 (e5979018)
Split the registration from the STDP4028 probe routine and only perform
registration once both the STDP4028 and STD
On Tue, 2021-11-23 at 16:18 +0100, Robert Foss wrote:
> Hey Martyn,
>
> On Tue, 16 Nov 2021 at 13:28, Martyn Welch
> wrote:
> >
> > In the configuration used by the b850v3, the STDP2690 is used to read
> > EDID
> > data whilst it's the STDP4028 which c
4.814279] r10:0000 r9: r8: r7: r6:
r5:801499a8
[ 4.822120] r4:817efa40
[4.824664] Code: e3a02080 e593001c e3a01d33 e3a05000 (e5979018)
Split the registration from the STDP4028 probe routine and only perform
registration once both the STDP4028 and
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 10:07:45AM +0200, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-03-28 at 18:52 +0100, Martyn Welch wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 06:44:50PM +0200, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> [...]
> > > It is the ipu1_di0_pre_sel and ipu2_di0_pre_sel setup that is important
>
On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 06:44:50PM +0200, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> Hi Martyn,
>
> On Tue, 2017-03-28 at 11:49 +0100, Martyn Welch wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 12:11:12PM +0100, Martyn Welch wrote:
> > > On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 11:42:53AM +0100, Philipp Zabel wrote:
&g
On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 12:11:12PM +0100, Martyn Welch wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 11:42:53AM +0100, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> > On Fri, 2017-03-24 at 10:24 +0000, Martyn Welch wrote:
> > [...]
> > > > Could you move to v4.9 or v4.10 and check if the fo
On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 11:42:53AM +0100, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-03-24 at 10:24 +0000, Martyn Welch wrote:
> [...]
> > > Could you move to v4.9 or v4.10 and check if the four patches in
> > > https://git.pengutronix.de/cgit/pza/linux/tag/?id=v4.9-ipu-dp-plane-
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 06:18:44PM +0100, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> Hi Martyn,
>
> On Tue, 2017-03-21 at 09:50 +0000, Martyn Welch wrote:
> > I have an i.MX6 platform with 2 display port interfaces, one driven by the
> > HDMI interface, the other by LVDS, both via brid
I have an i.MX6 platform with 2 display port interfaces, one driven by the
HDMI interface, the other by LVDS, both via bridges. We are currently
experiencing the following error when we boot with the monitor connected
to the LVDS backed interface and then connect a monitor to the HDMI backed
interf
ff-by: Peter Senna Tschudin
Acked-by: Martyn Welch
> ---
> Changes from V3:
> - 2/4 instead of 3/5
>
> Unchanged from V2
>
> Changes from V1:
> - Replaced '_' by '-' in node names or compatible strings
> - Added missing @73 t
Thierry Reding
> Signed-off-by: Peter Senna Tschudin
Acked-by: Martyn Welch
> ---
> Changes from V3:
> - The connector is created when there is no bridge instead of only when
>there is a pannel
> - Tested on next-20160804
>
> Changes from V2:
> - Updated to be a
ngs the chip up in 32-bit mode
and modified the DTS to suit. Seemed like the easiest way to see whether
it would work. It does. I have a Radeon E6460 showing an X display, at
the moment using the fbdev driver. Baby steps...
> (Or use a 64-bit e5500 based chip ? :-)
>
Yeah, haven't got a
uite "completed". I can dig internally if
> I can put my hand onto something.
>
Thanks Ben, that would be much appreciated.
> If possible at all, can you try to configure your SoC to bring the MMIO
> space of the PCIe within the bottom 32-bit of the chip address space ?
On 18/06/14 02:05, Dave Airlie wrote:
> On 18 June 2014 05:14, Martyn Welch wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've been asked to try and get a r600 based (E6460) graphics card running on
>> a machine powered by a Freescale p4080 (e500 core). I've run into a bit of a
>
of ideas, any pointers or suggestions on how I might get this
working? Has this ever been attempted before?
Martyn
--
Martyn Welch (Lead Software Engineer) | Registered in England and Wales
GE Intelligent Platforms | (3828642) at 100 Barbirolli Square
T +44(0)1327322748
20 matches
Mail list logo