On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 7:52 PM, Alan Cox wrote:
>> Look up tables have some hidden penalties but I think it might be a
>> win. Looks like we may have to benchmark the solutions against one
>> another to really know which is best in real life.
>
> For x86 and ppc the single assembler instruction i
Seems like a good simplification.
Reviewed-by: Matt Turner
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 7:52 PM, Alan Cox wrote:
>> Look up tables have some hidden penalties but I think it might be a
>> win. Looks like we may have to benchmark the solutions against one
>> another to really know which is best in real life.
>
> For x86 and ppc the single assembler instruction i
Seems like a good simplification.
Reviewed-by: Matt Turner
___
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
> +static inline GLint r600_log2(GLint n)
> +{
> + ? ? ? GLint log2 = 0;
> +
> + ? ? ? while (n >>= 1)
> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ++log2;
> + ? ? ? return log2;
> +}
Does mesa not provide something like this?
Matt
> +static inline GLint r600_log2(GLint n)
> +{
> + GLint log2 = 0;
> +
> + while (n >>= 1)
> + ++log2;
> + return log2;
> +}
Does mesa not provide something like this?
Matt
___
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freed
? ? ? ?if (dev_priv == NULL)
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?return -ENOMEM;
>
> - ? ? ? memset(dev_priv, 0, sizeof(drm_savage_private_t));
> ? ? ? ?dev->dev_private = (void *)dev_priv;
>
> ? ? ? ?dev_priv->chipset = (enum savage_family)chipset;
> ___
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
>
Reviewed-by: Matt Turner
t; if (dev_priv == NULL)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> - memset(dev_priv, 0, sizeof(drm_savage_private_t));
> dev->dev_private = (void *)dev_priv;
>
> dev_priv->chipset = (enum savage_family)chipset;
> ___
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
>
Reviewed-by: Matt Turner
___
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
t; header.scratch.n_bufs; i++) {
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?buf_idx = drm_buffer_pointer_to_dword(cmdbuf->buffer, 0);
> ___
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
>
Should help Alpha as well.
Acked-by: Matt Turner
t; header.scratch.n_bufs; i++) {
> buf_idx = drm_buffer_pointer_to_dword(cmdbuf->buffer, 0);
> ___
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
>
Should help Alpha as well.
Acke
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 6:30 AM, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 11:27:11AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 05:43:34PM +0200, Jerome Glisse wrote:
>> > Convert most AGP chipset to use scratch page as default entries.
>> > This help avoiding GPU querying 0 addr
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 6:30 AM, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 11:27:11AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 05:43:34PM +0200, Jerome Glisse wrote:
>> > Convert most AGP chipset to use scratch page as default entries.
>> > This help avoiding GPU querying 0 addr
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 3:51 PM, Alex Buell wrote:
> Does the r128 dri driver supports KMS in the kernel on PPC? I've a G3
> iMac 600 here working very well with OpenGL but was wondering if it
> could support KMS, in which case it would be quite nice.
>
> Thanks
There's been some talk about an r1
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 3:51 PM, Alex Buell wrote:
> Does the r128 dri driver supports KMS in the kernel on PPC? I've a G3
> iMac 600 here working very well with OpenGL but was wondering if it
> could support KMS, in which case it would be quite nice.
>
> Thanks
There's been some talk about an r1
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 3:05 PM, Conn Clark wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> Here is an inlined asm X86-64 COPY_DWORDS macro I wrote in case
> anybody would like to use it. it could be slightly improved by writing
> to 16 byte boundaries but its pretty near optimal when writing to
> uncached ram.
>
>
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 3:05 PM, Conn Clark wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> Here is an inlined asm X86-64 COPY_DWORDS macro I wrote in case
> anybody would like to use it. it could be slightly improved by writing
> to 16 byte boundaries but its pretty near optimal when writing to
> uncached ram.
>
>
101 - 116 of 116 matches
Mail list logo