[PATCH] Documentation: DocBook DRM framework documentation

2012-07-24 Thread Michael Jones
Hi Laurent, > I've used "behavior" when copying sections from the existing documentation. > I'll unify that. Does kernel documentation favour one of the spellings ? > Looking at v3.5, the American spelling is more common, but looking at how you spell favour, I think I know which one you favor

Re: [PATCH] Documentation: DocBook DRM framework documentation

2012-07-24 Thread Michael Jones
Hi Laurent, I've used behavior when copying sections from the existing documentation. I'll unify that. Does kernel documentation favour one of the spellings ? Looking at v3.5, the American spelling is more common, but looking at how you spell favour, I think I know which one you favor :)

[PATCH] Documentation: DocBook DRM framework documentation

2012-07-23 Thread Michael Jones
Hi Laurent, At a quick glance I noticed a couple of things: On 07/13/2012 02:00 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: [snip] > + > + The drm_driver structure contains static > + information that describe the driver and features it supports, and s/describe/describes/ > + pointers to

Re: [PATCH] Documentation: DocBook DRM framework documentation

2012-07-23 Thread Michael Jones
Hi Laurent, At a quick glance I noticed a couple of things: On 07/13/2012 02:00 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: [snip] +para + The structnamedrm_driver/structname structure contains static + information that describe the driver and features it supports, and s/describe/describes/