On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 12:32, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> There may be multiple ways of controlling the backlight on a given machine.
> Allow drivers to expose the type of interface they are providing, making
> it possible for userspace to make appropriate policy decisions.
maybe i missed something,
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 01:17, Joe Perches wrote:
> drivers/ata/pata_bf54x.c | 2 +-
> drivers/video/bf54x-lq043fb.c | 6 +++---
> drivers/video/bfin-t350mcqb-fb.c | 2 +-
Acked-by: Mike Frysinger
-mike
___
dri-deve
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 11:44, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Nov 2010 15:48:20 + Matthew Garrett wrote:
>> Richard, any feedback on this?
>>
>
> At KS akpm said he'd likely be taking over backlight from Richard,
> since Richard is very distracted with other things atm (please correct
> me if
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 02:53, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 11:44, Jesse Barnes wrote:
>> On Mon, 15 Nov 2010 15:48:20 + Matthew Garrett wrote:
>>> Richard, any feedback on this?
>>
>> At KS akpm said he'd likely be taking over backligh
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 01:17, Joe Perches wrote:
> ?drivers/ata/pata_bf54x.c ? ? ? ? ? | ? ?2 +-
> ?drivers/video/bf54x-lq043fb.c ? ? ?| ? ?6 +++---
> ?drivers/video/bfin-t350mcqb-fb.c ? | ? ?2 +-
Acked-by: Mike Frysinger
-mike
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 12:32, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> There may be multiple ways of controlling the backlight on a given machine.
> Allow drivers to expose the type of interface they are providing, making
> it possible for userspace to make appropriate policy decisions.
maybe i missed something,
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 11:44, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Nov 2010 15:48:20 + Matthew Garrett wrote:
>> Richard, any feedback on this?
>>
>
> At KS akpm said he'd likely be taking over backlight from Richard,
> since Richard is very distracted with other things atm (please correct
> me if
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 02:53, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 11:44, Jesse Barnes wrote:
>> On Mon, 15 Nov 2010 15:48:20 + Matthew Garrett wrote:
>>> Richard, any feedback on this?
>>
>> At KS akpm said he'd likely be taking over backligh
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 12:32, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> There may be multiple ways of controlling the backlight on a given machine.
> Allow drivers to expose the type of interface they are providing, making
> it possible for userspace to make appropriate policy decisions.
maybe i missed something,
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 01:17, Joe Perches wrote:
> drivers/ata/pata_bf54x.c | 2 +-
> drivers/video/bf54x-lq043fb.c | 6 +++---
> drivers/video/bfin-t350mcqb-fb.c | 2 +-
Acked-by: Mike Frysinger
-mike
___
dri-deve
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 01:17, Joe Perches wrote:
> ?drivers/ata/pata_bf54x.c ? ? ? ? ? | ? ?2 +-
> ?drivers/video/bf54x-lq043fb.c ? ? ?| ? ?6 +++---
> ?drivers/video/bfin-t350mcqb-fb.c ? | ? ?2 +-
Acked-by: Mike Frysinger
-mike
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 12:32, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> There may be multiple ways of controlling the backlight on a given machine.
> Allow drivers to expose the type of interface they are providing, making
> it possible for userspace to make appropriate policy decisions.
maybe i missed something,
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 11:44, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Nov 2010 15:48:20 + Matthew Garrett wrote:
>> Richard, any feedback on this?
>>
>
> At KS akpm said he'd likely be taking over backlight from Richard,
> since Richard is very distracted with other things atm (please correct
> me if
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 02:53, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 11:44, Jesse Barnes wrote:
>> On Mon, 15 Nov 2010 15:48:20 + Matthew Garrett wrote:
>>> Richard, any feedback on this?
>>
>> At KS akpm said he'd likely be taking over backligh
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 12:32, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> There may be multiple ways of controlling the backlight on a given machine.
> Allow drivers to expose the type of interface they are providing, making
> it possible for userspace to make appropriate policy decisions.
maybe i missed something,
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 01:17, Joe Perches wrote:
> drivers/ata/pata_bf54x.c | 2 +-
> drivers/video/bf54x-lq043fb.c | 6 +++---
> drivers/video/bfin-t350mcqb-fb.c | 2 +-
Acked-by: Mike Frysinger
-mike
___
dri-deve
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 12:32, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> There may be multiple ways of controlling the backlight on a given machine.
> Allow drivers to expose the type of interface they are providing, making
> it possible for userspace to make appropriate policy decisions.
maybe i missed something,
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 01:17, Joe Perches wrote:
> drivers/ata/pata_bf54x.c | 2 +-
> drivers/video/bf54x-lq043fb.c | 6 +++---
> drivers/video/bfin-t350mcqb-fb.c | 2 +-
Acked-by: Mike Frysinger
-mike
___
dri-deve
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 11:44, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Nov 2010 15:48:20 + Matthew Garrett wrote:
>> Richard, any feedback on this?
>>
>
> At KS akpm said he'd likely be taking over backlight from Richard,
> since Richard is very distracted with other things atm (please correct
> me if
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 02:53, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 11:44, Jesse Barnes wrote:
>> On Mon, 15 Nov 2010 15:48:20 + Matthew Garrett wrote:
>>> Richard, any feedback on this?
>>
>> At KS akpm said he'd likely be taking over backligh
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 12:32, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> There may be multiple ways of controlling the backlight on a given machine.
> Allow drivers to expose the type of interface they are providing, making
> it possible for userspace to make appropriate policy decisions.
maybe i missed something,
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 01:17, Joe Perches wrote:
> ?drivers/ata/pata_bf54x.c ? ? ? ? ? | ? ?2 +-
> ?drivers/video/bf54x-lq043fb.c ? ? ?| ? ?6 +++---
> ?drivers/video/bfin-t350mcqb-fb.c ? | ? ?2 +-
Acked-by: Mike Frysinger
-mike
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 01:17, Joe Perches wrote:
> ?drivers/ata/pata_bf54x.c ? ? ? ? ? | ? ?2 +-
> ?drivers/video/bf54x-lq043fb.c ? ? ?| ? ?6 +++---
> ?drivers/video/bfin-t350mcqb-fb.c ? | ? ?2 +-
Acked-by: Mike Frysinger
-mike
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 12:32, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> There may be multiple ways of controlling the backlight on a given machine.
> Allow drivers to expose the type of interface they are providing, making
> it possible for userspace to make appropriate policy decisions.
maybe i missed something,
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 11:44, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Nov 2010 15:48:20 + Matthew Garrett wrote:
>> Richard, any feedback on this?
>>
>
> At KS akpm said he'd likely be taking over backlight from Richard,
> since Richard is very distracted with other things atm (please correct
> me if
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 02:53, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 11:44, Jesse Barnes wrote:
>> On Mon, 15 Nov 2010 15:48:20 + Matthew Garrett wrote:
>>> Richard, any feedback on this?
>>
>> At KS akpm said he'd likely be taking over backligh
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 01:17, Joe Perches wrote:
> ?drivers/ata/pata_bf54x.c ? ? ? ? ? | ? ?2 +-
> ?drivers/video/bf54x-lq043fb.c ? ? ?| ? ?6 +++---
> ?drivers/video/bfin-t350mcqb-fb.c ? | ? ?2 +-
Acked-by: Mike Frysinger
-mike
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 12:32, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> There may be multiple ways of controlling the backlight on a given machine.
> Allow drivers to expose the type of interface they are providing, making
> it possible for userspace to make appropriate policy decisions.
maybe i missed something,
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 12:32, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> There may be multiple ways of controlling the backlight on a given machine.
> Allow drivers to expose the type of interface they are providing, making
> it possible for userspace to make appropriate policy decisions.
maybe i missed something,
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 01:17, Joe Perches wrote:
> drivers/ata/pata_bf54x.c | 2 +-
> drivers/video/bf54x-lq043fb.c | 6 +++---
> drivers/video/bfin-t350mcqb-fb.c | 2 +-
Acked-by: Mike Frysinger
-mike
___
dri-deve
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 01:17, Joe Perches wrote:
> ?drivers/ata/pata_bf54x.c ? ? ? ? ? | ? ?2 +-
> ?drivers/video/bf54x-lq043fb.c ? ? ?| ? ?6 +++---
> ?drivers/video/bfin-t350mcqb-fb.c ? | ? ?2 +-
Acked-by: Mike Frysinger
-mike
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 12:32, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> There may be multiple ways of controlling the backlight on a given machine.
> Allow drivers to expose the type of interface they are providing, making
> it possible for userspace to make appropriate policy decisions.
maybe i missed something,
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 12:32, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> There may be multiple ways of controlling the backlight on a given machine.
> Allow drivers to expose the type of interface they are providing, making
> it possible for userspace to make appropriate policy decisions.
maybe i missed something,
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 01:17, Joe Perches wrote:
> drivers/ata/pata_bf54x.c | 2 +-
> drivers/video/bf54x-lq043fb.c | 6 +++---
> drivers/video/bfin-t350mcqb-fb.c | 2 +-
Acked-by: Mike Frysinger
-mike
___
dri-deve
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 11:44, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Nov 2010 15:48:20 + Matthew Garrett wrote:
>> Richard, any feedback on this?
>>
>
> At KS akpm said he'd likely be taking over backlight from Richard,
> since Richard is very distracted with other things atm (please correct
> me if
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 02:53, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 11:44, Jesse Barnes wrote:
>> On Mon, 15 Nov 2010 15:48:20 + Matthew Garrett wrote:
>>> Richard, any feedback on this?
>>
>> At KS akpm said he'd likely be taking over backligh
36 matches
Mail list logo
