Linux 3.5.3 - i915 error

attached as error.gz Best, Paul -- Paul RollandE-Mail : rol(at)witbe.net CTO - Witbe.net SA Tel. +33 (0)1 47 67 77 77 Les Collines de l'Arche Fax. +33 (0)1 47 67 77 99 F-92057 Paris La DefenseRIPE : PR12

3.5.0-rc3 - i915 gmbus dpb timed out

Hello, I've booted a few seconds ago to a freshly compiled 3.5.0-rc3 kernel, and short after starting X + KDE, I've got : Jun 25 19:16:58 tux kernel: [drm] GMBUS [i915 gmbus dpb] timed out, falling back to bit banging on pin 5 in my messages. Nothing like that before (3.4.0-vanilla), and

3.5.0-rc3 - i915 gmbus dpb timed out

Hello, I've booted a few seconds ago to a freshly compiled 3.5.0-rc3 kernel, and short after starting X + KDE, I've got : Jun 25 19:16:58 tux kernel: [drm] GMBUS [i915 gmbus dpb] timed out, falling back to bit banging on pin 5 in my messages. Nothing like that before (3.4.0-vanilla), and

[3.0.0-rc3] GMBUS timed out

hat harmless > > (though I doubt kernel messages about a time out are harmless ;) > > It's harmless in this case. Just a warning that the new hw driven method > failed and we are now using the old CPU driven method. OK, so I guess that me feeling the display is less responsive whe

[3.0.0-rc3] GMBUS timed out

Hello, I've just booted 3.0.0-rc3 on my machine, and I got that message : Jun 16 15:32:07 tux kernel: [drm] GMBUS timed out, falling back to bit banging on pin 5 [i915 gmbus dpb] I've checked my logs, and I never got that with my previous 2.6.39.1 kernel, so that looks like something new to

[PATCH] drm: Prune GEM vma entries

Hello, You can add a: Tested-by: Paul Rolland This is indeed fixing the memory leak in size-32 pool on my machine. Thanks a lot, Paul On Mon, 27 Sep 2010 21:08:36 +0100 Chris Wilson wrote: > Hook the GEM vm open/close ops into the generic drm vm open/close so > that the vma e

Re: [PATCH] drm: Prune GEM vma entries

Hello, You can add a: Tested-by: Paul Rolland r...@as2917.net This is indeed fixing the memory leak in size-32 pool on my machine. Thanks a lot, Paul On Mon, 27 Sep 2010 21:08:36 +0100 Chris Wilson ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk wrote: Hook the GEM vm open/close ops into the generic drm vm open

[PATCH] drm: Prune GEM vma entries

Hello, On Fri, 01 Oct 2010 19:09:56 -0500 Matt Mackall wrote: > On Mon, 2010-09-27 at 21:08 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > > Hook the GEM vm open/close ops into the generic drm vm open/close so > > that the vma entries are created and destroy appropriately. > > > > Reported-by: Matt Mackall > >

Re: [PATCH] drm: Prune GEM vma entries

Hello, On Fri, 01 Oct 2010 19:09:56 -0500 Matt Mackall m...@selenic.com wrote: On Mon, 2010-09-27 at 21:08 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: Hook the GEM vm open/close ops into the generic drm vm open/close so that the vma entries are created and destroy appropriately. Reported-by: Matt

2.6.35-rc6+: i915: Bisected regression

Hello Thomas, On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 19:36:18 +0200 Thomas Meyer wrote: > On Sunday 01 August 2010 17:17:54 Roberto Oppedisano wrote: > > On 01/08/2010 15:14, Paul Rolland wrote: > > > My machine has : > > > 00:02.0 0300: 8086:2a42 (rev 07) > > > 00:02.1 038

2.6.35-rc6+: i915: Bisected regression

Hello Thomas, On Sun, 1 Aug 2010 12:51:36 +0200 Thomas Meyer wrote: > Am 01.08.2010 um 13:42 schrieb Stefan Richter : > > > Thomas, on what hardware did you observe the regression? > > Is a Intel mobile express gm45 chipset. My machine has : 00:02.0 0300: 8086:2a42 (rev 07) 00:02.1 0380:

Re: 2.6.35-rc6+: i915: Bisected regression

Hello Thomas, On Sun, 1 Aug 2010 12:51:36 +0200 Thomas Meyer tho...@m3y3r.de wrote: Am 01.08.2010 um 13:42 schrieb Stefan Richter stef...@s5r6.in-berlin.de: Thomas, on what hardware did you observe the regression? Is a Intel mobile express gm45 chipset. My machine has : 00:02.0 0300: