Re: [patch 22/30] net/mlx5: Replace irq_to_desc() abuse

2020-12-14 Thread Saeed Mahameed
c->num_tc = params->num_tc; > c->xdp = !!params->xdp_prog; > c->stats= &priv->channel_stats[ix].ch; > - c->irq_desc = irq_to_desc(irq); > + c->aff_mask = irq_get_affinity_mask(irq); as long as the affinity mask pointer

Re: [patch 23/30] net/mlx5: Use effective interrupt affinity

2020-12-14 Thread Saeed Mahameed
pace, > but the architecture can or even must reduce the mask to the > effective set, > which means that checking the affinity mask itself does not really > tell > about the actual target CPUs. > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner > Cc: Saeed Mahameed > Cc: Leon Romanovsky >

Re: [RFC 0/6] Regressions for "imply" behavior change

2020-04-17 Thread Saeed Mahameed
On Thu, 2020-04-16 at 11:52 -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 02:38:50PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 12:17 PM Jani Nikula > > wrote: > > > On Thu, 16 Apr 2020, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > > On Thu, Ap

Re: [RFC 0/6] Regressions for "imply" behavior change

2020-04-16 Thread Saeed Mahameed
On Tue, 2020-04-14 at 20:47 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 7:49 PM Saeed Mahameed > wrote: > > On Tue, 2020-04-14 at 17:25 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 5:23 PM Jason Gunthorpe > > > wrote: > > > Correct

Re: [RFC 0/6] Regressions for "imply" behavior change

2020-04-15 Thread Saeed Mahameed
n Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 07:04:27PM +, Saeed Mahameed wrote: > > > which in turn leads to mlx5_core.ko *not* containing > > > mlx5_vxlan.o, > > > and in turn causing that link error against > > > mlx5_vxlan_create/mlx5_vxlan_destroy, unless the IS_ENABLED() >

Re: [RFC 0/6] Regressions for "imply" behavior change

2020-04-11 Thread Saeed Mahameed
On Fri, 2020-04-10 at 14:13 -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 02:40:42AM +0000, Saeed Mahameed wrote: > > > This assumes that the module using FOO has its own flag > > representing > > FOO which is not always the case. > > > > for exam

Re: [RFC 0/6] Regressions for "imply" behavior change

2020-04-10 Thread Saeed Mahameed
On Thu, 2020-04-09 at 11:41 +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Wed, 08 Apr 2020, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 08, 2020 at 10:49:48PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 10:38 PM Nicolas Pitre > > > wrote: > > > > On Wed, 8 Apr 2020, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > > > I have

Re: [RFC 0/6] Regressions for "imply" behavior change

2020-04-09 Thread Saeed Mahameed
On Wed, 2020-04-08 at 16:38 -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > On Wed, 8 Apr 2020, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > Hi everyone, > > > > I've just restarted doing randconfig builds on top of mainline > > Linux and > > found a couple of regressions with missing dependency from the > > recent > > change in th