Hello Thierry,
On Tue, Dec 05, 2023 at 01:36:05PM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 09:58:41PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 06:49:23PM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, 08 Nov 2023 11:43:26 +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > > >
On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 09:58:41PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 06:49:23PM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 08 Nov 2023 11:43:26 +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > > Merging
> > > ===
> > > I propose to take entire patchset through my tree (Samsung So
On 28/11/2023 21:58, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 06:49:23PM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, 08 Nov 2023 11:43:26 +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> Merging
>>> ===
>>> I propose to take entire patchset through my tree (Samsung SoC), because:
> ^^^
On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 06:49:23PM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
>
> On Wed, 08 Nov 2023 11:43:26 +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > Merging
> > ===
> > I propose to take entire patchset through my tree (Samsung SoC), because:
^
On Wed, 08 Nov 2023 11:43:26 +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> Merging
> ===
> I propose to take entire patchset through my tree (Samsung SoC), because:
> 1. Next cycle two new SoCs will be coming (Google GS101 and ExynosAutov920),
> so
>they will touch the same lines in some of the DT