Re: [0/5] video-SMSC UFX: Adjustments for five function implementations

2017-12-29 Thread SF Markus Elfring
>> Delete an error message for a failed memory allocation in two functions > > This patch removes the information about the device for which the allocation > fails. Should a Linux allocation failure report be sufficient here? >> Less checks in ufx_usb_probe() after error detection > >

Re: [PATCH 0/5] video-SMSC UFX: Adjustments for five function implementations

2017-12-29 Thread Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
On Saturday, November 25, 2017 09:42:57 PM SF Markus Elfring wrote: > From: Markus Elfring > Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2017 21:38:42 +0100 > > A few update suggestions were taken into account > from static source code analysis. > > Markus Elfring (5): > Delete an error

[PATCH 0/5] video-SMSC UFX: Adjustments for five function implementations

2017-11-25 Thread SF Markus Elfring
From: Markus Elfring Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2017 21:38:42 +0100 A few update suggestions were taken into account from static source code analysis. Markus Elfring (5): Delete an error message for a failed memory allocation in two functions Less checks in