Max backlight value for the panel was being calculated using byte
count i.e. 0x if 2 bytes are supported for backlight brightness
and 0xff if 1 byte is supported. However, EDP_PWMGEN_BIT_COUNT
determines the number of active control bits used for the brightness
setting. Thus, even if the panel
On 11/22/19 6:15 PM, Lyude Paul wrote:
Max backlight value for the panel was being calculated using byte
count i.e. 0x if 2 bytes are supported for backlight brightness
and 0xff if 1 byte is supported. However, EDP_PWMGEN_BIT_COUNT
determines the number of active control bits used for the bri
On Mon, 16 Dec 2019, AceLan Kao wrote:
> I tried to reply the patch from the mailing list archive by clicking
> the author name
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2019-November/246278.html
>
> mailto:dri-devel%40lists.freedesktop.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BPATCH%201/5%5D%20drm/i915%3A%
I tried to reply the patch from the mailing list archive by clicking
the author name
https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2019-November/246278.html
mailto:dri-devel%40lists.freedesktop.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BPATCH%201/5%5D%20drm/i915%3A%20Fix%20eDP%20DPCD%20aux%20max%20backlight%20calc
On Thu, 12 Dec 2019, AceLan Kao wrote:
> This series of patches works well on a new platform which has a panel
> only controls by DPCD aux brightness.
>
> Tested-by: AceLan Kao
Please fix your mail client to actually reply to the thread, and retain
all the recipients. As it is, your replies are
This series of patches works well on a new platform which has a panel
only controls by DPCD aux brightness.
Tested-by: AceLan Kao
--
Chia-Lin Kao(AceLan)
http://blog.acelan.idv.tw/
E-Mail: acelan.kaoATcanonical.com (s/AT/@/)
___
dri-devel mailing list
Max backlight value for the panel was being calculated using byte
count i.e. 0x if 2 bytes are supported for backlight brightness
and 0xff if 1 byte is supported. However, EDP_PWMGEN_BIT_COUNT
determines the number of active control bits used for the brightness
setting. Thus, even if the panel