[Bug 17902] [830M missing dvo driver] need support for DVO-LVDS via na2501

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17902 Elizabeth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED

[Bug 17902] [830M missing dvo driver] need support for DVO-LVDS via na2501

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17902 Daniel Vetter changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug 17902] [830M missing dvo driver] need support for DVO-LVDS via na2501

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17902 --- Comment #93 from Cool Loki --- Created attachment 69804 --> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=69804=edit dmesg.txt dmseg.txt kernel 3.7.0-rc4 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 17902] [830M missing dvo driver] need support for DVO-LVDS via na2501

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17902 --- Comment #92 from Cool Loki --- Created attachment 69803 --> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=69803=edit lspci -v My laptop model: Fujitsu Siemens FMV-610NU2 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for

[Bug 17902] [830M missing dvo driver] need support for DVO-LVDS via na2501

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17902 --- Comment #91 from Cool Loki --- Created attachment 69802 --> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=69802=edit intel_drm_dumper -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. -- next part

[Bug 17902] [830M missing dvo driver] need support for DVO-LVDS via na2501

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17902 --- Comment #90 from Cool Loki --- Created attachment 69801 --> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=69801=edit rom_loki.bin -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. -- next part

[Bug 17902] [830M missing dvo driver] need support for DVO-LVDS via na2501

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17902 Cool Loki changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|WORKSFORME

[Bug 17902] [830M missing dvo driver] need support for DVO-LVDS via na2501

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17902 Cool Loki cl.l...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED

[Bug 17902] [830M missing dvo driver] need support for DVO-LVDS via na2501

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17902 --- Comment #90 from Cool Loki cl.l...@gmail.com --- Created attachment 69801 -- https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=69801action=edit rom_loki.bin -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 17902] [830M missing dvo driver] need support for DVO-LVDS via na2501

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17902 --- Comment #91 from Cool Loki cl.l...@gmail.com --- Created attachment 69802 -- https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=69802action=edit intel_drm_dumper -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 17902] [830M missing dvo driver] need support for DVO-LVDS via na2501

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17902 --- Comment #92 from Cool Loki cl.l...@gmail.com --- Created attachment 69803 -- https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=69803action=edit lspci -v My laptop model: Fujitsu Siemens FMV-610NU2 -- You are receiving this mail because:

[Bug 17902] [830M missing dvo driver] need support for DVO-LVDS via na2501

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17902 --- Comment #93 from Cool Loki cl.l...@gmail.com --- Created attachment 69804 -- https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=69804action=edit dmesg.txt dmseg.txt kernel 3.7.0-rc4 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the

[Bug 17902] [830M missing dvo driver] need support for DVO-LVDS via na2501

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17902 Daniel Vetter dan...@ffwll.ch changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED

[Bug 17902] [830M missing dvo driver] need support for DVO-LVDS via na2501

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17902 Florian Mickler flor...@mickler.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||flor...@mickler.org

[Bug 17902] [830M missing dvo driver] need support for DVO-LVDS via na2501

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17902 --- Comment #87 from Daniel Vetter 2012-06-27 02:08:17 PDT --- (In reply to comment #86) > Now two weeks passed, I submitted five versions for a patch of this bug to the > mailing list, one here in public, yet nothing shows up in the official

[Bug 17902] [830M missing dvo driver] need support for DVO-LVDS via na2501

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17902 --- Comment #86 from thor at math.tu-berlin.de 2012-06-27 00:17:50 PDT --- Now two weeks passed, I submitted five versions for a patch of this bug to the mailing list, one here in public, yet nothing shows up in the official git repository at

[Bug 17902] [830M missing dvo driver] need support for DVO-LVDS via na2501

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17902 --- Comment #86 from t...@math.tu-berlin.de 2012-06-27 00:17:50 PDT --- Now two weeks passed, I submitted five versions for a patch of this bug to the mailing list, one here in public, yet nothing shows up in the official git repository at all.

[Bug 17902] [830M missing dvo driver] need support for DVO-LVDS via na2501

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17902 --- Comment #87 from Daniel Vetter dan...@ffwll.ch 2012-06-27 02:08:17 PDT --- (In reply to comment #86) Now two weeks passed, I submitted five versions for a patch of this bug to the mailing list, one here in public, yet nothing shows up in

[Bug 17902] [830M missing dvo driver] need support for DVO-LVDS via na2501

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17902 thor at math.tu-berlin.de changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 17902] [830M missing dvo driver] need support for DVO-LVDS via na2501

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17902 t...@math.tu-berlin.de changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 17902] [830M missing dvo driver] need support for DVO-LVDS via na2501

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17902 --- Comment #83 from thor at math.tu-berlin.de 2012-06-06 18:21:06 PDT --- Finally, success! I'm not quite sure why, but for reasons unclear to me the DVO chip only wants to talk if the PLL is enabled and running and the screen resolution fits.

[Bug 17902] [830M missing dvo driver] need support for DVO-LVDS via na2501

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17902 --- Comment #83 from t...@math.tu-berlin.de 2012-06-06 18:21:06 PDT --- Finally, success! I'm not quite sure why, but for reasons unclear to me the DVO chip only wants to talk if the PLL is enabled and running and the screen resolution fits. In

[Bug 17902] [830M missing dvo driver] need support for DVO-LVDS via na2501

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17902 --- Comment #82 from thor at math.tu-berlin.de 2012-06-03 10:35:15 PDT --- Got a step further. What one can do to get a stable picture is simply to disable the scaler. For this, insert: in dvo_ns2501.c, in the function static void

[Bug 17902] [830M missing dvo driver] need support for DVO-LVDS via na2501

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17902 --- Comment #82 from t...@math.tu-berlin.de 2012-06-03 10:35:15 PDT --- Got a step further. What one can do to get a stable picture is simply to disable the scaler. For this, insert: in dvo_ns2501.c, in the function static void ns2501_mode_set

[Bug 17902] [830M missing dvo driver] need support for DVO-LVDS via na2501

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17902 --- Comment #81 from thor at math.tu-berlin.de 2012-06-01 06:10:32 UTC --- Well, I've got a bit futher: 1) One can get i2c access mostly reliable when the drm.debug option is set high. Thus, whether or not the i2c interface works is likely a

[Bug 17902] [830M missing dvo driver] need support for DVO-LVDS via na2501

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17902 --- Comment #81 from t...@math.tu-berlin.de 2012-06-01 06:10:32 UTC --- Well, I've got a bit futher: 1) One can get i2c access mostly reliable when the drm.debug option is set high. Thus, whether or not the i2c interface works is likely a matter

[Bug 17902] [830M missing dvo driver] need support for DVO-LVDS via na2501

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17902 --- Comment #80 from Gilles Dartiguelongue 2012-05-29 15:14:55 PDT --- Actually, last I read this datasheet, it said that we could obtain the programming guide from our local NS vendor. I think that's what we are missing to have a functional

[Bug 17902] [830M missing dvo driver] need support for DVO-LVDS via na2501

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17902 --- Comment #79 from thor at math.tu-berlin.de 2012-05-29 14:29:24 PDT --- But as the drm module is never loaded, the corresponding i2c devices are not exposed? Can I trigger this process manually without loading the drm module? The idea was to

[Bug 17902] [830M missing dvo driver] need support for DVO-LVDS via na2501

On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 9:13 PM, wrote: > --- Comment #75 from thor at math.tu-berlin.de 2012-05-29 12:13:12 PDT --- > Well, I do have a documentation from National Semiconductors, but there is > nothing that would define frequencies or bandwidths - only the sync pulses can > be set, and intput

[Bug 17902] [830M missing dvo driver] need support for DVO-LVDS via na2501

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17902 --- Comment #78 from Daniel Vetter 2012-05-29 14:13:48 PDT --- > --- Comment #77 from thor at math.tu-berlin.de 2012-05-29 14:05:28 PDT --- > Sorry if this sounds like a stupid question - but how come that i2cdetect only > sees one bus when

[Bug 17902] [830M missing dvo driver] need support for DVO-LVDS via na2501

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17902 --- Comment #77 from thor at math.tu-berlin.de 2012-05-29 14:05:28 PDT --- Sorry if this sounds like a stupid question - but how come that i2cdetect only sees one bus when booting with the vga frame buffer, but 7 with the i915drm module in place?

[Bug 17902] [830M missing dvo driver] need support for DVO-LVDS via na2501

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17902 --- Comment #76 from Daniel Vetter 2012-05-29 12:20:12 PDT --- On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 9:13 PM, wrote: > --- Comment #75 from thor at math.tu-berlin.de 2012-05-29 12:13:12 PDT --- > Well, I do have a documentation from National

[Bug 17902] [830M missing dvo driver] need support for DVO-LVDS via na2501

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17902 --- Comment #75 from thor at math.tu-berlin.de 2012-05-29 12:13:12 PDT --- Well, I do have a documentation from National Semiconductors, but there is nothing that would define frequencies or bandwidths - only the sync pulses can be set, and

[Bug 17902] [830M missing dvo driver] need support for DVO-LVDS via na2501

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17902 --- Comment #74 from Daniel Vetter 2012-05-29 00:36:03 PDT --- > I played with i2cset here and there and could disable and enable the screen > with register #8, bit #0, but I do not get a usable screen. I do not know > enough about DVO chips to

[Bug 17902] [830M missing dvo driver] need support for DVO-LVDS via na2501

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17902 --- Comment #73 from thor at math.tu-berlin.de 2012-05-28 23:59:16 PDT --- Ok, so I now fiddled a little bit with the patched kernel and the i2c utilities. In fact, I do get "something like a picture" on this machine. By which I mean that the

[Bug 17902] [830M missing dvo driver] need support for DVO-LVDS via na2501

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17902 --- Comment #73 from t...@math.tu-berlin.de 2012-05-28 23:59:16 PDT --- Ok, so I now fiddled a little bit with the patched kernel and the i2c utilities. In fact, I do get something like a picture on this machine. By which I mean that the image is

[Bug 17902] [830M missing dvo driver] need support for DVO-LVDS via na2501

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17902 --- Comment #74 from Daniel Vetter dan...@ffwll.ch 2012-05-29 00:36:03 PDT --- I played with i2cset here and there and could disable and enable the screen with register #8, bit #0, but I do not get a usable screen. I do not know enough about

[Bug 17902] [830M missing dvo driver] need support for DVO-LVDS via na2501

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17902 --- Comment #75 from t...@math.tu-berlin.de 2012-05-29 12:13:12 PDT --- Well, I do have a documentation from National Semiconductors, but there is nothing that would define frequencies or bandwidths - only the sync pulses can be set, and intput

Re: [Bug 17902] [830M missing dvo driver] need support for DVO-LVDS via na2501

On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 9:13 PM, bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org wrote: --- Comment #75 from t...@math.tu-berlin.de 2012-05-29 12:13:12 PDT --- Well, I do have a documentation from National Semiconductors, but there is nothing that would define frequencies or bandwidths - only the sync pulses

[Bug 17902] [830M missing dvo driver] need support for DVO-LVDS via na2501

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17902 --- Comment #76 from Daniel Vetter dan...@ffwll.ch 2012-05-29 12:20:12 PDT --- On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 9:13 PM, bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org wrote: --- Comment #75 from t...@math.tu-berlin.de 2012-05-29 12:13:12 PDT --- Well, I do have a

[Bug 17902] [830M missing dvo driver] need support for DVO-LVDS via na2501

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17902 --- Comment #77 from t...@math.tu-berlin.de 2012-05-29 14:05:28 PDT --- Sorry if this sounds like a stupid question - but how come that i2cdetect only sees one bus when booting with the vga frame buffer, but 7 with the i915drm module in place? Is

[Bug 17902] [830M missing dvo driver] need support for DVO-LVDS via na2501

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17902 --- Comment #78 from Daniel Vetter dan...@ffwll.ch 2012-05-29 14:13:48 PDT --- --- Comment #77 from t...@math.tu-berlin.de 2012-05-29 14:05:28 PDT --- Sorry if this sounds like a stupid question - but how come that i2cdetect only sees one bus

[Bug 17902] [830M missing dvo driver] need support for DVO-LVDS via na2501

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17902 --- Comment #79 from t...@math.tu-berlin.de 2012-05-29 14:29:24 PDT --- But as the drm module is never loaded, the corresponding i2c devices are not exposed? Can I trigger this process manually without loading the drm module? The idea was to

[Bug 17902] [830M missing dvo driver] need support for DVO-LVDS via na2501

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17902 --- Comment #80 from Gilles Dartiguelongue gilles.dartiguelon...@esiee.org 2012-05-29 15:14:55 PDT --- Actually, last I read this datasheet, it said that we could obtain the programming guide from our local NS vendor. I think that's what we are

[Bug 17902] [830M missing dvo driver] need support for DVO-LVDS via na2501

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17902 --- Comment #72 from thor at math.tu-berlin.de 2012-05-25 14:51:23 PDT --- Ok, I managed to cross-compile the patched kernel sources on a much faster x64 machine, so I now have an initrd and a vmlinuz with the patch in it. I won't have access to

[Bug 17902] [830M missing dvo driver] need support for DVO-LVDS via na2501

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17902 Daniel Vetter changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[830M] need support for |[830M missing dvo driver]

[Bug 17902] [830M missing dvo driver] need support for DVO-LVDS via na2501

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17902 Daniel Vetter dan...@ffwll.ch changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[830M] need support for |[830M missing dvo driver]

[Bug 17902] [830M missing dvo driver] need support for DVO-LVDS via na2501

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17902 --- Comment #72 from t...@math.tu-berlin.de 2012-05-25 14:51:23 PDT --- Ok, I managed to cross-compile the patched kernel sources on a much faster x64 machine, so I now have an initrd and a vmlinuz with the patch in it. I won't have access to the