https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204181
doesnotcomp...@posteo.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||doesnotcomp...@posteo.de
--- C
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204181
buro (francesco.bure...@proton.me) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||francesco.bure...@pro
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204181
--- Comment #67 from mn...@protonmail.com ---
(In reply to mnrzk from comment #66)
> Created attachment 290589 [details]
> drm/amd/display: Clear dm_state for fast updates
>
> Alright, the bug patch I mentioned in the last comment seems to be goo
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204181
mn...@protonmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mn...@protonmail.com
--- Comment #
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204181
--- Comment #65 from Christopher Snowhill (kod...@gmail.com) ---
Oh, there is no file attach here. So I'll just paste the whole thing in this
response:
Jun 18 19:53:40 mrgency kernel: general protection fault, probably for
non-canonical address 0
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204181
--- Comment #64 from Christopher Snowhill (kod...@gmail.com) ---
I encountered this crash twice today on a slightly modified Arch 5.7.2 kernel.
Attaching a crash log.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the b
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204181
Julien Isorce (julien.iso...@gmail.com) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||julien.iso...@gm
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204181
ZenAnonX (zenan...@protonmail.ch) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zenan...@protonmail.ch
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204181
--- Comment #61 from jamespharve...@gmail.com ---
It might look like I'm just ranting. That's not the reason I posted my
comment. I'm trying to give feedback to AMD about how bad so many customer
experiences are right now, and have been for quit
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204181
--- Comment #60 from jamespharve...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Sergey Kondakov from comment #59)
>
> And how about instead of knowingly pushing untested code with known fatal
> errors you stop taking QA notes from FGLRX in the first place and do
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204181
--- Comment #59 from Sergey Kondakov (virtuous...@gmail.com) ---
(In reply to Andrey Grodzovsky from comment #57)
> Sergey, instead of throwing tantrums why can't you just do what you are
> asked ? You present an extremely convoluted set of driver
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204181
Damian Nowak (s...@nowaker.net) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||s...@nowaker.net
--- Co
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204181
--- Comment #57 from Andrey Grodzovsky (andrey.grodzov...@amd.com) ---
Sergey, instead of throwing tantrums why can't you just do what you are asked ?
You present an extremely convoluted set of driver config params and demand from
us resolving the
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204181
--- Comment #56 from Sergey Kondakov (virtuous...@gmail.com) ---
(In reply to Alex Deucher from comment #54)
> (In reply to Sergey Kondakov from comment #53)
> > Or any of these ?
> > options amdgpu cik_support=1 si_support=1 msi=1 disp_priority=2
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204181
--- Comment #55 from Tom Seewald (tseew...@gmail.com) ---
(In reply to Sergey Kondakov from comment #53)
> Created attachment 285209 [details]
> dmesg_2019-09-26-amdgpu-old_dereference_on_patched_5.3.1
>
> After about a day of uptime my patched 5
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204181
--- Comment #54 from Alex Deucher (alexdeuc...@gmail.com) ---
(In reply to Sergey Kondakov from comment #53)
> Or any of these ?
> options amdgpu cik_support=1 si_support=1 msi=1 disp_priority=2 dpm=1
> runpm=1 sched_policy=1 compute_multipipe=1 v
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204181
--- Comment #53 from Sergey Kondakov (virtuous...@gmail.com) ---
Created attachment 285209
--> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=285209&action=edit
dmesg_2019-09-26-amdgpu-old_dereference_on_patched_5.3.1
After about a day of uptime
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204181
--- Comment #52 from Sergey Kondakov (virtuous...@gmail.com) ---
(In reply to Alex Deucher from comment #51)
> Patches have been sent to stable and should land soon.
Thanks !
However, it seems that not all is well, after all: using vm_update_mode
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204181
--- Comment #51 from Alex Deucher (alexdeuc...@gmail.com) ---
Patches have been sent to stable and should land soon.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
__
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204181
--- Comment #50 from Sergey Kondakov (virtuous...@gmail.com) ---
(In reply to Christopher Snowhill from comment #49)
> RX 480. Applied patch, haven't had any spurious crashes since. Using
> patchset since kernel 5.2.14, now using it on 5.3. Haven'
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204181
Christopher Snowhill (kod...@gmail.com) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kod...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204181
--- Comment #48 from jamespharve...@gmail.com ---
Vega 64.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
___
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
h
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204181
jamespharve...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jamespharve...@gmail.com
--- C
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204181
--- Comment #46 from Tom Seewald (tseew...@gmail.com) ---
Will these patches[1] be back ported to 5.2/5.3 or will we need to wait until
this hopefully lands in 5.4?
[1] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/64505/
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204181
--- Comment #45 from Tom Seewald (tseew...@gmail.com) ---
> Unfortunately, it didn't fix the page flip-triggered dereference for me. Do
> you have page flip related errors in Xorg log on "modesetting" X driver ?
> With and without it ?
I don't be
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204181
--- Comment #44 from Sergey Kondakov (virtuous...@gmail.com) ---
(In reply to Alex Deucher from comment #41)
> (In reply to Sergey Kondakov from comment #40)
>
> >
> > I little bit strange to call 2x1080p on AMD's fancy 5-port GPU (+ possible
>
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204181
Tom Seewald (tseew...@gmail.com) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tseew...@gmail.com
---
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204181
--- Comment #42 from Michel Dänzer (mic...@daenzer.net) ---
(In reply to Alex Deucher from comment #37)
> The TearFree option is there to deal with compositors that do not support
> sync to vblank.
Also for cases where a compositor cannot prevent
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204181
--- Comment #41 from Alex Deucher (alexdeuc...@gmail.com) ---
(In reply to Sergey Kondakov from comment #40)
>
> I little bit strange to call 2x1080p on AMD's fancy 5-port GPU (+ possible
> DP multiplexing) "my issue".
It's a limitation of des
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204181
--- Comment #40 from Sergey Kondakov (virtuous...@gmail.com) ---
(In reply to Alex Deucher from comment #39)
> (In reply to Sergey Kondakov from comment #38)
> Here is your issue: "simple 2x1080p"
>
> multiple display are really hard to deal with
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204181
--- Comment #39 from Alex Deucher (alexdeuc...@gmail.com) ---
(In reply to Sergey Kondakov from comment #38)
>
> Thanks ! It's a shame, I've already begun believing in "The Silver Bullet of
> VSync". And it's completely "software" GPU-agnostic fu
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204181
--- Comment #38 from Sergey Kondakov (virtuous...@gmail.com) ---
(In reply to Alex Deucher from comment #37)
> (In reply to Sergey Kondakov from comment #34)
> > By the way, is there any disadvantage in forcing TearFree to be always on
> > when it
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204181
Alex Deucher (alexdeuc...@gmail.com) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||alexdeuc...@gmail.c
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204181
--- Comment #36 from Sergey Kondakov (virtuous...@gmail.com) ---
(In reply to Nicholas Kazlauskas from comment #35)
> Do you mind posting your compositor settings in plasma? That would certainly
> influence flip timing and submission and I haven't
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204181
--- Comment #35 from Nicholas Kazlauskas (nicholas.kazlaus...@amd.com) ---
Do you mind posting your compositor settings in plasma? That would certainly
influence flip timing and submission and I haven't been able to reproduce the
issue with the se
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204181
--- Comment #34 from Sergey Kondakov (virtuous...@gmail.com) ---
(In reply to Nicholas Kazlauskas from comment #33)
> I(In reply to Sergey Kondakov from comment #26)
> > Created attachment 284083 [details]
> > dmesg_2019-08-02-amdgpu_fail_on_patch
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204181
--- Comment #33 from Nicholas Kazlauskas (nicholas.kazlaus...@amd.com) ---
I(In reply to Sergey Kondakov from comment #26)
> Created attachment 284083 [details]
> dmesg_2019-08-02-amdgpu_fail_on_patched_5.2.5
>
> (In reply to Nicholas Kazlauskas
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204181
--- Comment #32 from Sergey Kondakov (virtuous...@gmail.com) ---
Just got exactly the same 0010:amdgpu_vm_update_directories+0xe7/0x260
dereference immediately on login even with PageFlip & TearFree disabled and
ShadowPrimary NOT enabled. Even wit
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204181
--- Comment #31 from Sergey Kondakov (virtuous...@gmail.com) ---
(In reply to Andrey Grodzovsky from comment #30)
> (In reply to Sergey Kondakov from comment #27)
>
> Sergey, I tried to reproduce you latest issue on Ellsmere (Polaris 10) with
> "
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204181
Andrey Grodzovsky (andrey.grodzov...@amd.com) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andrey.gro
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204181
chirn...@hotmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||chirn...@hotmail.com
--- Comment #
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204181
vr00m (vmuppa...@outlook.com) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vmuppa...@outlook.com
---
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204181
--- Comment #27 from Sergey Kondakov (virtuous...@gmail.com) ---
Created attachment 284153
--> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=284153&action=edit
dmesg_2019-08-04-amdgpu-new_dereference-with-shadowprimary
So, I've been using expli
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204181
--- Comment #26 from Sergey Kondakov (virtuous...@gmail.com) ---
Created attachment 284083
--> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=284083&action=edit
dmesg_2019-08-02-amdgpu_fail_on_patched_5.2.5
(In reply to Nicholas Kazlauskas from
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204181
--- Comment #25 from Sergey Kondakov (virtuous...@gmail.com) ---
(In reply to Nicholas Kazlauskas from comment #24)
> This should be fixed with the series linked below:
>
> https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/64505/
>
> But it still needs r
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204181
--- Comment #24 from Nicholas Kazlauskas (nicholas.kazlaus...@amd.com) ---
This should be fixed with the series linked below:
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/64505/
But it still needs review and backporting to older kernels.
--
You ar
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204181
--- Comment #23 from Sergey Kondakov (virtuous...@gmail.com) ---
(In reply to Nicholas Kazlauskas from comment #22)
> Thanks for the log!
>
> I can reproduce the issue now by emulating the sequence using IGT. It
> doesn't seem to show up in deskt
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204181
--- Comment #22 from Nicholas Kazlauskas (nicholas.kazlaus...@amd.com) ---
Thanks for the log!
I can reproduce the issue now by emulating the sequence using IGT. It doesn't
seem to show up in desktop usage for me.
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204181
Frank Steinborn (stei...@nognu.de) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||stei...@nognu.de
---
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204181
--- Comment #20 from Nicholas Kazlauskas (nicholas.kazlaus...@amd.com) ---
I haven't been able to reproduce this on my setup yet with xf86-video-amdgpu on
Arch's 5.2.2 kernel. I don't see anything really missing between that and
staging that could
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204181
--- Comment #19 from Yann HN (a...@21xayah.com) ---
(In reply to Michel Dänzer from comment #18)
> (In reply to Yann HN from comment #17)
> > A friend suggested me to install some packages to enhance the GPU Support,
> > one of them was "xf86-vide
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204181
--- Comment #18 from Michel Dänzer (mic...@daenzer.net) ---
(In reply to Yann HN from comment #17)
> A friend suggested me to install some packages to enhance the GPU Support,
> one of them was "xf86-video-amdgpu".
>
> Seams like that package was
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204181
Yann HN (a...@21xayah.com) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||a...@21xayah.com
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204181
--- Comment #16 from Sergey Kondakov (virtuous...@gmail.com) ---
(In reply to Nicholas Kazlauskas from comment #15)
> Thanks for the logs. I don't think this is related to your overclock.
>
> Since this behavior wasn't previously observed during
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204181
--- Comment #15 from Nicholas Kazlauskas (nicholas.kazlaus...@amd.com) ---
Thanks for the logs. I don't think this is related to your overclock.
Since this behavior wasn't previously observed during our 5.2 testing I think
that either a patch got
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204181
--- Comment #14 from Sergey Kondakov (virtuous...@gmail.com) ---
(In reply to Nicholas Kazlauskas from comment #10)
> Thanks for all the logs.
>
> I meant drm.debug=4 actually, the drm=debug=4 was a typo on my part - sorry!
So, I've got all I co
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204181
--- Comment #13 from Sergey Kondakov (virtuous...@gmail.com) ---
Created attachment 283745
--> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=283745&action=edit
tail -n 2000 from dmesg with "drm.debug=5"
drm.debug=4 seem to produce only 1 new re
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204181
Sergey Kondakov (virtuous...@gmail.com) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #283695|0 |1
is obs
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204181
--- Comment #11 from Sergey Kondakov (virtuous...@gmail.com) ---
Created attachment 283709
--> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=283709&action=edit
/proc/interrupts
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assig
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204181
--- Comment #10 from Nicholas Kazlauskas (nicholas.kazlaus...@amd.com) ---
Thanks for all the logs.
I meant drm.debug=4 actually, the drm=debug=4 was a typo on my part - sorry!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assign
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204181
--- Comment #9 from Sergey Kondakov (virtuous...@gmail.com) ---
(In reply to Nicholas Kazlauskas from comment #1)
> Do you mind posting an dmesg log with drm=debug=4 as part of your boot
> parameters?
>
> An xorg log would be good too if applicab
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204181
--- Comment #8 from Sergey Kondakov (virtuous...@gmail.com) ---
Created attachment 283707
--> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=283707&action=edit
lspci -t -PP -q -k -v
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the a
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204181
--- Comment #7 from Sergey Kondakov (virtuous...@gmail.com) ---
Created attachment 283705
--> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=283705&action=edit
lspci -vv
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of t
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204181
--- Comment #6 from Sergey Kondakov (virtuous...@gmail.com) ---
Created attachment 283703
--> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=283703&action=edit
lsmem
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the b
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204181
--- Comment #5 from Sergey Kondakov (virtuous...@gmail.com) ---
Created attachment 283701
--> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=283701&action=edit
X.log
amdgpu has TearFree and VariableRefresh (no LCD support though) enabled.
Dual-s
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204181
--- Comment #4 from Sergey Kondakov (virtuous...@gmail.com) ---
Created attachment 283699
--> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=283699&action=edit
amdgpu parameters
These doesn't seem to change anything about the hang. Although, may
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204181
--- Comment #2 from Sergey Kondakov (virtuous...@gmail.com) ---
Created attachment 283695
--> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=283695&action=edit
dmesg with "drm=debug=4"
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching th
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204181
--- Comment #3 from Sergey Kondakov (virtuous...@gmail.com) ---
Created attachment 283697
--> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=283697&action=edit
kernel build config
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the ass
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204181
Nicholas Kazlauskas (nicholas.kazlaus...@amd.com) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nichol
69 matches
Mail list logo
