[Bug 207383] [Regression] 5.7-rc: amdgpu/polaris11 gpf: amdgpu_atomic_commit_tail

2020-05-06 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=207383 --- Comment #13 from Duncan (1i5t5.dun...@cox.net) --- Well, so much for /that/ bisect! Took me a few hours but then had the graphics stall twice in a few minutes... with the above commit reverted AND with memory compression off. So it's back to

[Bug 207383] [Regression] 5.7-rc: amdgpu/polaris11 gpf: amdgpu_atomic_commit_tail

2020-05-06 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=207383 --- Comment #12 from Duncan (1i5t5.dun...@cox.net) --- OK, bisect says: 4064b9827 Peter Xu mm: allow VM_FAULT_RETRY for multiple times ... which came in via akpm and touches drivers/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_vm.c. But I'm not entirely confident in that re

[Bug 207383] [Regression] 5.7-rc: amdgpu/polaris11 gpf: amdgpu_atomic_commit_tail

2020-05-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=207383 --- Comment #11 from Duncan (1i5t5.dun...@cox.net) --- (In reply to Duncan from comment #10) > I did get an apparent graphics crash at the bisect-point above, but it > didn't dump anything in the log this time Got a gpf dump with amdgpu_atomic_co

[Bug 207383] [Regression] 5.7-rc: amdgpu/polaris11 gpf: amdgpu_atomic_commit_tail

2020-05-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=207383 --- Comment #10 from Duncan (1i5t5.dun...@cox.net) --- (In reply to Duncan from comment #9) > I'm not there yet but it's starting to look like a possibly dud bisect: > everything showing good so far Good but not ideal news! I did get an apparent

[Bug 207383] [Regression] 5.7-rc: amdgpu/polaris11 gpf: amdgpu_atomic_commit_tail

2020-05-02 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=207383 --- Comment #9 from Duncan (1i5t5.dun...@cox.net) --- I'm not there yet but it's starting to look like a possibly dud bisect: everything showing good so far. Maybe I didn't wait long enough for the bug to trigger at some step and I'm running up t

[Bug 207383] [Regression] 5.7-rc: amdgpu/polaris11 gpf: amdgpu_atomic_commit_tail

2020-05-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=207383 --- Comment #8 from Duncan (1i5t5.dun...@cox.net) --- Hmm. Don't think I mentioned on this bug yet that I'm running dual 4K TVs as monitors. So it could only trigger on dual display, and two 4K displays means it's pumping a lot more pixels than

[Bug 207383] [Regression] 5.7-rc: amdgpu/polaris11 gpf: amdgpu_atomic_commit_tail

2020-05-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=207383 --- Comment #7 from Duncan (1i5t5.dun...@cox.net) --- Bisecting, but it's slow going when the bug can take 12+ hours to trigger, and even then I can't be sure a "good" is actually so. So far (at 5.6.0-01623-g12ab316ce, ~7 bisect steps to go, unde

[Bug 207383] [Regression] 5.7-rc: amdgpu/polaris11 gpf: amdgpu_atomic_commit_tail

2020-04-27 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=207383 --- Comment #6 from Alex Deucher (alexdeuc...@gmail.com) --- Can you bisect? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists

[Bug 207383] [Regression] 5.7-rc: amdgpu/polaris11 gpf: amdgpu_atomic_commit_tail

2020-04-27 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=207383 --- Comment #5 from Duncan (1i5t5.dun...@cox.net) --- Well, that didn't take long. Four konsole terminals open to do (various aspects of) a system update. Just a few seconds after I entered the (git-based) sync command, display-FREEZE! Back on

[Bug 207383] [Regression] 5.7-rc: amdgpu/polaris11 gpf: amdgpu_atomic_commit_tail

2020-04-27 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=207383 Duncan (1i5t5.dun...@cox.net) changed: What|Removed |Added Kernel Version|5.7-rc1, 5.7-rc2|5.7-rc1, 5.7-rc2, 5.7-rc3

[Bug 207383] [Regression] 5.7-rc: amdgpu/polaris11 gpf: amdgpu_atomic_commit_tail

2020-04-22 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=207383 --- Comment #3 from Duncan (1i5t5.dun...@cox.net) --- CCed the two from MAINTAINERS bugzi would let me add. It wouldn't let me add amd-gfx@ or david1.zhou@, and Alex's gmail address according to bugzi isn't what's in MAINTAINERS. -- You are rec

[Bug 207383] [Regression] 5.7-rc: amdgpu/polaris11 gpf: amdgpu_atomic_commit_tail

2020-04-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=207383 Duncan (1i5t5.dun...@cox.net) changed: What|Removed |Added Regression|No |Yes --- Comment #2 from D

[Bug 207383] [Regression] 5.7-rc: amdgpu/polaris11 gpf: amdgpu_atomic_commit_tail

2020-04-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=207383 --- Comment #1 from Duncan (1i5t5.dun...@cox.net) --- Created attachment 288651 --> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=288651&action=edit automated boot-time dmesg dump -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the as