https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60659
--- Comment #9 from Alexey Brodkin ---
I have exactly the same laptop - HP Elitebook 8560w with a nVidia Quadro 1000M,
NVC1 (GF108) in nouveau slang - and used to suffer from similar issue.
But I've just tried Fedora 20 image for Graphics test da
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60659
Aaron Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aaron.lu at intel.com
--- Comment #8 from Aaro
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60659
Ilia Mirkin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||imirkin at alum.mit.edu
--- Comment #1 from
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60659
--- Comment #2 from Charles-Antoine Couret ---
Yes :
[root at DiNozzo ~]# dmesg | grep backlight
[ 11.400712] nouveau [ DRM] ACPI backlight interface available, not
registering our own
But, if I use the option :
acpi_osi=Linux, acpi_back
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60659
--- Comment #3 from Ilia Mirkin ---
OK, but does the provided driver effectively control backlight? (i.e. writing
into /sys/class/backlight/...)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60659
--- Comment #4 from Charles-Antoine Couret ---
With default option, after boot :
[root at DiNozzo ~]# cat /sys/class/backlight/acpi_video0/brightness
20
Same conditions, after pressure of FN down brightness key :
[root at DiNozzo ~]# cat /sys/c
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60659
--- Comment #5 from Ilia Mirkin ---
I think we're not understanding each other... you filed this bug because
nouveau wasn't registering a backlight interface. I pointed out why this was
and told you how to make it register one (acpi_backlight=vend
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60659
--- Comment #6 from Charles-Antoine Couret ---
Ah ok?
Sorry, with acpi_backlight=vendor, I have /sys/class/backlight/nv_backlight/
folder (in place of /sys/class/backlight/acpi_video0/) and write in
/sys/class/backlight/nv_backlight/brightness w
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60659
--- Comment #7 from Ilia Mirkin ---
In the larger sense of "are you having a problem", yes there is a bug
somewhere.
But IMO it's not in the nouveau driver. Perhaps discuss this with the person on
the other bug who suggested there was an issue in
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60659
Aaron Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aaron...@intel.com
--- Comment #8 from Aaron L
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60659
Ilia Mirkin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||imir...@alum.mit.edu
--- Comment #1 from Il
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60659
--- Comment #2 from Charles-Antoine Couret ---
Yes :
[root@DiNozzo ~]# dmesg | grep backlight
[ 11.400712] nouveau [ DRM] ACPI backlight interface available, not
registering our own
But, if I use the option :
acpi_osi=Linux, acpi_backlig
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60659
--- Comment #3 from Ilia Mirkin ---
OK, but does the provided driver effectively control backlight? (i.e. writing
into /sys/class/backlight/...)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
__
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60659
--- Comment #4 from Charles-Antoine Couret ---
With default option, after boot :
[root@DiNozzo ~]# cat /sys/class/backlight/acpi_video0/brightness
20
Same conditions, after pressure of FN down brightness key :
[root@DiNozzo ~]# cat /sys/class/b
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60659
--- Comment #5 from Ilia Mirkin ---
I think we're not understanding each other... you filed this bug because
nouveau wasn't registering a backlight interface. I pointed out why this was
and told you how to make it register one (acpi_backlight=vend
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60659
--- Comment #6 from Charles-Antoine Couret ---
Ah ok…
Sorry, with acpi_backlight=vendor, I have /sys/class/backlight/nv_backlight/
folder (in place of /sys/class/backlight/acpi_video0/) and write in
/sys/class/backlight/nv_backlight/brightness w
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60659
--- Comment #7 from Ilia Mirkin ---
In the larger sense of "are you having a problem", yes there is a bug
somewhere.
But IMO it's not in the nouveau driver. Perhaps discuss this with the person on
the other bug who suggested there was an issue in
17 matches
Mail list logo