https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62959
Alexandre Demers changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62959
--- Comment #73 from Michel D?nzer ---
(In reply to comment #71)
> It's just that I was seeing new CCers being added and this bug is still open
> because Udo was experiencing a problem that looked like the current bug.
As you said, you're the
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62959
--- Comment #72 from udo ---
I can see if the bug is still present (aside from OpenCL usage) in normal
desktop usage (mail, web, youtube, etc).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-- next part
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62959
--- Comment #71 from Alexandre Demers ---
(In reply to comment #67)
> (In reply to comment #66)
> > While I'm the one who opened this bug, on my side I'm able to run all piglit
> > tests without any hangs since awhile now.
>
> Even with GPU
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62959
--- Comment #70 from udo ---
Tom Stellard advised me not to use virtual memory, first by patch and later
with RADEON_VA=0 as OpenCL started to work for Cayman (ARUBA here in A10-5800K)
graphics.
Which bug to see for virtual memory and OpenCL?
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62959
--- Comment #69 from Marek Ol??k ---
(In reply to comment #67)
> (In reply to comment #66)
> > While I'm the one who opened this bug, on my side I'm able to run all piglit
> > tests without any hangs since awhile now.
>
> Even with GPU virtual
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62959
--- Comment #68 from udo ---
I still use RADEON_VA=0 to avoid GPU lockups etc.
Was anything changed so there's reason to test with RADEON_VA=1?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-- next part
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62959
--- Comment #67 from Michel D?nzer ---
(In reply to comment #66)
> While I'm the one who opened this bug, on my side I'm able to run all piglit
> tests without any hangs since awhile now.
Even with GPU virtual memory enabled? If so, this report
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62959
--- Comment #67 from Michel Dänzer mic...@daenzer.net ---
(In reply to comment #66)
While I'm the one who opened this bug, on my side I'm able to run all piglit
tests without any hangs since awhile now.
Even with GPU virtual memory enabled? If
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62959
--- Comment #68 from udo udo...@xs4all.nl ---
I still use RADEON_VA=0 to avoid GPU lockups etc.
Was anything changed so there's reason to test with RADEON_VA=1?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62959
--- Comment #69 from Marek Olšák mar...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #67)
(In reply to comment #66)
While I'm the one who opened this bug, on my side I'm able to run all piglit
tests without any hangs since awhile now.
Even with GPU
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62959
--- Comment #70 from udo udo...@xs4all.nl ---
Tom Stellard advised me not to use virtual memory, first by patch and later
with RADEON_VA=0 as OpenCL started to work for Cayman (ARUBA here in A10-5800K)
graphics.
Which bug to see for virtual
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62959
--- Comment #73 from Michel Dänzer mic...@daenzer.net ---
(In reply to comment #71)
It's just that I was seeing new CCers being added and this bug is still open
because Udo was experiencing a problem that looked like the current bug.
As you
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62959
--- Comment #66 from Alexandre Demers ---
While I'm the one who opened this bug, on my side I'm able to run all piglit
tests without any hangs since awhile now. I don't even need to run one test at
a time anymore. But I'm using latest git
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62959
--- Comment #66 from Alexandre Demers alexandre.f.dem...@gmail.com ---
While I'm the one who opened this bug, on my side I'm able to run all piglit
tests without any hangs since awhile now. I don't even need to run one test at
a time anymore. But
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62959
--- Comment #65 from udo ---
Running kernel 3.9.x (3.9.4 now), git mesa, git ati driver I had no issues with
these adjustments:
# cat /etc/environment
LIBGL_DRIVERS_PATH=/opt/xorg/lib/dri/
R600_DEBUG=nodma
and:
# git diff
diff --git
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62959
--- Comment #65 from udo udo...@xs4all.nl ---
Running kernel 3.9.x (3.9.4 now), git mesa, git ati driver I had no issues with
these adjustments:
# cat /etc/environment
LIBGL_DRIVERS_PATH=/opt/xorg/lib/dri/
R600_DEBUG=nodma
and:
# git diff
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62959
--- Comment #64 from udo ---
Weird thing is that with 3.8.10 the box has been stable for a few days without
weird radeon-related errors.
Currently trying 3.9.1.
Git mesa, llvm, libclc, xf-video-ati etc
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62959
--- Comment #63 from udo ---
Currently running 3.6.0-02886-gd9a8074 and that one help up OK so far for 28
hours. How long to continue before declaring this kernel good?
Previous bisect kernel 3.6.0-05487-g24d7b40 was found within 24 hours to
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62959
--- Comment #62 from Alexandre Demers ---
(In reply to comment #60)
> The first bisect kernel I try gives me youtube videos that are blocks of
> gibberish. What to do about that?
>
> 3.7.1. crashed like previous kernels (showing text boot
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62959
--- Comment #61 from Alexandre Demers ---
I compiled drm-next yesterday (which should be found in kernel 3.10 any day
now). I've been able to run piglit r600.test without any problem 2 times (just
in case, I rebooted beween each). Is there any
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62959
--- Comment #61 from Alexandre Demers alexandre.f.dem...@gmail.com ---
I compiled drm-next yesterday (which should be found in kernel 3.10 any day
now). I've been able to run piglit r600.test without any problem 2 times (just
in case, I rebooted
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62959
--- Comment #62 from Alexandre Demers alexandre.f.dem...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #60)
The first bisect kernel I try gives me youtube videos that are blocks of
gibberish. What to do about that?
3.7.1. crashed like previous kernels
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62959
--- Comment #63 from udo udo...@xs4all.nl ---
Currently running 3.6.0-02886-gd9a8074 and that one help up OK so far for 28
hours. How long to continue before declaring this kernel good?
Previous bisect kernel 3.6.0-05487-g24d7b40 was found within
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62959
--- Comment #60 from udo ---
The first bisect kernel I try gives me youtube videos that are blocks of
gibberish. What to do about that?
3.7.1. crashed like previous kernels (showing text boot screen) but no messages
in the log.
So is that the
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62959
--- Comment #60 from udo udo...@xs4all.nl ---
The first bisect kernel I try gives me youtube videos that are blocks of
gibberish. What to do about that?
3.7.1. crashed like previous kernels (showing text boot screen) but no messages
in the log.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62959
--- Comment #59 from Alexandre Demers ---
(In reply to comment #58)
> Ok, just starting the first iteration compile.
> Is there a better testcase for the issue(s) we look for than using the PC
> for a while, watching youtube, etc?
You could run
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62959
--- Comment #58 from udo ---
Ok, just starting the first iteration compile.
Is there a better testcase for the issue(s) we look for than using the PC for a
while, watching youtube, etc?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62959
--- Comment #57 from Alexandre Demers ---
(In reply to comment #55)
> Also: where are the minor kernel versions in that tree? It goes from 3.7-rcX
> to 3.6-rcX.
I'm sure you can use Linus' tree (between v3.6.0 and v3.7.0 for example). If
you
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62959
--- Comment #56 from Alex Deucher ---
For stable kernels you need to use the stable branches:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git
if you've already checked out Linus' tree, you can add the stable tree as a
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62959
--- Comment #55 from udo ---
Also: where are the minor kernel versions in that tree? It goes from 3.7-rcX to
3.6-rcX.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-- next part --
An HTML
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62959
--- Comment #54 from udo ---
This afternoon I found a box, still somewhat alive, with a crashed Xorg, shoing
a textmode bootup screen.
It was running 3.6.11.
So if we assume the hardware is OK and that 3.6.11 was indeed solid then either
mesa,
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62959
--- Comment #53 from Alexandre Demers ---
(In reply to comment #52)
> W.r.t. bisecting I found the info at http://webchick.net/node/99.
> Next week I do not have to go to work so I could give it a try.
> Where do I get the sources from?
> And
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62959
--- Comment #54 from udo udo...@xs4all.nl ---
This afternoon I found a box, still somewhat alive, with a crashed Xorg, shoing
a textmode bootup screen.
It was running 3.6.11.
So if we assume the hardware is OK and that 3.6.11 was indeed solid
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62959
--- Comment #56 from Alex Deucher ag...@yahoo.com ---
For stable kernels you need to use the stable branches:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git
if you've already checked out Linus' tree, you can add the stable
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62959
--- Comment #57 from Alexandre Demers alexandre.f.dem...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #55)
Also: where are the minor kernel versions in that tree? It goes from 3.7-rcX
to 3.6-rcX.
I'm sure you can use Linus' tree (between v3.6.0 and
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62959
--- Comment #59 from Alexandre Demers alexandre.f.dem...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #58)
Ok, just starting the first iteration compile.
Is there a better testcase for the issue(s) we look for than using the PC
for a while, watching
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62959
--- Comment #53 from Alexandre Demers alexandre.f.dem...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #52)
W.r.t. bisecting I found the info at http://webchick.net/node/99.
Next week I do not have to go to work so I could give it a try.
Where do I get
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62959
--- Comment #52 from udo ---
W.r.t. bisecting I found the info at http://webchick.net/node/99.
Next week I do not have to go to work so I could give it a try.
Where do I get the sources from?
And what sha1's refer to all radeon commits in
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62959
--- Comment #52 from udo udo...@xs4all.nl ---
W.r.t. bisecting I found the info at http://webchick.net/node/99.
Next week I do not have to go to work so I could give it a try.
Where do I get the sources from?
And what sha1's refer to all radeon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62959
--- Comment #51 from Alexandre Demers ---
(In reply to comment #50)
> It crashed so we'll go for 3.7.5.
I'm sure 3.7.0 will already display the problem. It was probably introduced
between 3.6 and 3.7-rc1. Have you ever bisected before? I could
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62959
--- Comment #50 from udo ---
It crashed so we'll go for 3.7.5.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62959
--- Comment #49 from udo ---
No messages that I could find in /var/log/messages. Xorg.0.log or so didn't
help.
Doing 3.7.6. since shortly after that unplanned boot. So far it's OK.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62959
--- Comment #48 from Alexandre Demers ---
(In reply to comment #47)
> And it crashed, booted.
Any message in your logs?
And I think you now have a reference to bisect.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62959
--- Comment #47 from udo ---
And it crashed, booted.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62959
--- Comment #46 from udo ---
Booted 3.7.8.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62959
--- Comment #46 from udo udo...@xs4all.nl ---
Booted 3.7.8.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62959
--- Comment #47 from udo udo...@xs4all.nl ---
And it crashed, booted.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
dri-devel mailing list
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62959
--- Comment #48 from Alexandre Demers alexandre.f.dem...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #47)
And it crashed, booted.
Any message in your logs?
And I think you now have a reference to bisect.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62959
--- Comment #49 from udo udo...@xs4all.nl ---
No messages that I could find in /var/log/messages. Xorg.0.log or so didn't
help.
Doing 3.7.6. since shortly after that unplanned boot. So far it's OK.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62959
--- Comment #50 from udo udo...@xs4all.nl ---
It crashed so we'll go for 3.7.5.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
dri-devel mailing list
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62959
--- Comment #51 from Alexandre Demers alexandre.f.dem...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #50)
It crashed so we'll go for 3.7.5.
I'm sure 3.7.0 will already display the problem. It was probably introduced
between 3.6 and 3.7-rc1. Have you
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62959
--- Comment #45 from udo ---
drm 2.4.44, git for the rest.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62959
--- Comment #44 from Alexandre Demers ---
(In reply to comment #43)
> 3.6.11 was OK but also maybe is kinda 'old'.
Then try a 3.7 kernel if possible to see if a first bug was introduced there or
if it all happened in the 3.8 branch. If I
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62959
--- Comment #43 from udo ---
3.6.11 was OK but also maybe is kinda 'old'.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62959
--- Comment #42 from Alexandre Demers ---
(In reply to comment #40)
> in /etc/environment I have R600_DEBUG=nodma ever since discovering that
> setting, i.e.: also now the R6))_DEBUG is set to nodma.
>
> I did not apply any of your patches over
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62959
--- Comment #41 from Alexandre Demers ---
(In reply to comment #40)
> in /etc/environment I have R600_DEBUG=nodma ever since discovering that
> setting, i.e.: also now the R6))_DEBUG is set to nodma.
>
> I did not apply any of your patches over
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62959
--- Comment #40 from udo ---
in /etc/environment I have R600_DEBUG=nodma ever since discovering that
setting, i.e.: also now the R6))_DEBUG is set to nodma.
I did not apply any of your patches over the 3.9.0-rc7 kernel.
--
You are receiving
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62959
--- Comment #39 from Alexandre Demers ---
(In reply to comment #38)
> 3.9.0-rc7 here.
>
> Just saw this:
>
> [ 67.568697] Bluetooth: BNEP socket layer initialized
> [ 2144.364903] radeon :00:01.0: GPU fault detected: 147 0x0d422602
> [
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62959
--- Comment #38 from udo ---
3.9.0-rc7 here.
Just saw this:
[ 67.568697] Bluetooth: BNEP socket layer initialized
[ 2144.364903] radeon :00:01.0: GPU fault detected: 147 0x0d422602
[ 2144.364908] radeon :00:01.0:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62959
--- Comment #37 from Alexandre Demers ---
(In reply to comment #36)
> Alex, despite having your 2nd patch in, the box just crashed and rebooted.
> I'll revert to your first patch to see if that one still helps.
By reading bug 62997 you've
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62959
--- Comment #36 from udo ---
Alex, despite having your 2nd patch in, the box just crashed and rebooted.
I'll revert to your first patch to see if that one still helps.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62959
--- Comment #35 from udo ---
Alex, despite having your 2nd patch in, I found:
Apr 17 16:26:07 o2 kernel: [91224.372170] radeon :00:01.0: GPU fault
detected: 146 0x0594260c
Apr 17 16:26:07 o2 kernel: [91224.372175] radeon :00:01.0:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62959
--- Comment #36 from udo udo...@xs4all.nl ---
Alex, despite having your 2nd patch in, the box just crashed and rebooted.
I'll revert to your first patch to see if that one still helps.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62959
--- Comment #38 from udo udo...@xs4all.nl ---
3.9.0-rc7 here.
Just saw this:
[ 67.568697] Bluetooth: BNEP socket layer initialized
[ 2144.364903] radeon :00:01.0: GPU fault detected: 147 0x0d422602
[ 2144.364908] radeon :00:01.0:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62959
--- Comment #39 from Alexandre Demers alexandre.f.dem...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #38)
3.9.0-rc7 here.
Just saw this:
[ 67.568697] Bluetooth: BNEP socket layer initialized
[ 2144.364903] radeon :00:01.0: GPU fault
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62959
--- Comment #40 from udo udo...@xs4all.nl ---
in /etc/environment I have R600_DEBUG=nodma ever since discovering that
setting, i.e.: also now the R6))_DEBUG is set to nodma.
I did not apply any of your patches over the 3.9.0-rc7 kernel.
--
You
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62959
--- Comment #41 from Alexandre Demers alexandre.f.dem...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #40)
in /etc/environment I have R600_DEBUG=nodma ever since discovering that
setting, i.e.: also now the R6))_DEBUG is set to nodma.
I did not apply
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62959
--- Comment #43 from udo udo...@xs4all.nl ---
3.6.11 was OK but also maybe is kinda 'old'.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
dri-devel mailing list
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62959
--- Comment #44 from Alexandre Demers alexandre.f.dem...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #43)
3.6.11 was OK but also maybe is kinda 'old'.
Then try a 3.7 kernel if possible to see if a first bug was introduced there or
if it all happened in
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62959
--- Comment #45 from udo udo...@xs4all.nl ---
drm 2.4.44, git for the rest.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
dri-devel mailing list
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62959
Alex Deucher changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||udovdh at xs4all.nl
--- Comment #34 from
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62959
Alex Deucher ag...@yahoo.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||udo...@xs4all.nl
---
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62959
--- Comment #33 from Alex Deucher ---
(In reply to comment #32)
> Attachment 77608 [details] fixes the lockups, which suggests the DRM driver
> doesn't actually flush caches when it should.
radeon_ring_vm_flush() doesn't actually flush caches
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62959
--- Comment #32 from Marek Ol??k ---
Attachment 77608 fixes the lockups, which suggests the DRM driver doesn't
actually flush caches when it should.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-- next
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62959
--- Comment #33 from Alex Deucher ag...@yahoo.com ---
(In reply to comment #32)
Attachment 77608 [details] fixes the lockups, which suggests the DRM driver
doesn't actually flush caches when it should.
radeon_ring_vm_flush() doesn't actually
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62959
--- Comment #31 from Alexandre Demers ---
(In reply to comment #29)
> Do either of Jerome's patches help?
Applied both, ran 2 times r600.test and everything went fine. I'll test with
only one patch applied at a time later today.
--
You are
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62959
--- Comment #30 from Alexandre Demers ---
(In reply to comment #29)
> Do either of Jerome's patches help?
Didn't have time to test them yesterday, I'll try them probably at the end of
the day.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62959
--- Comment #29 from Alex Deucher ---
Do either of Jerome's patches help?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62959
--- Comment #28 from Alexandre Demers ---
Marek, you are right and I must have been "lucky" yesterday when I tested it. I
launched two runs, and hit two different hanging tests this time:
glean/polygonOffset (first run)
glean/pointAtten (second
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62959
--- Comment #27 from Alexandre Demers ---
(In reply to comment #26)
> It's not important for this bug if the test fails (I think it does), what's
> important is whether it hangs the machine or not.
That's what I meant. I'm launching a new run
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62959
--- Comment #26 from Marek Ol??k ---
It's not important for this bug if the test fails (I think it does), what's
important is whether it hangs the machine or not.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62959
--- Comment #25 from Alexandre Demers ---
(In reply to comment #24)
> Alex, I'm sorry but your patch does not fix the lockups on my Cayman (HD
> 6950). :( The piglit test "initialized-fbo" can be used to reproduce the
> lockup.
Are all the
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62959
--- Comment #24 from Marek Ol??k ---
Alex, I'm sorry but your patch does not fix the lockups on my Cayman (HD 6950).
:( The piglit test "initialized-fbo" can be used to reproduce the lockup.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62959
--- Comment #30 from Alexandre Demers alexandre.f.dem...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #29)
Do either of Jerome's patches help?
Didn't have time to test them yesterday, I'll try them probably at the end of
the day.
--
You are receiving
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62959
--- Comment #31 from Alexandre Demers alexandre.f.dem...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #29)
Do either of Jerome's patches help?
Applied both, ran 2 times r600.test and everything went fine. I'll test with
only one patch applied at a time
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62959
--- Comment #32 from Marek Olšák mar...@gmail.com ---
Attachment 77608 fixes the lockups, which suggests the DRM driver doesn't
actually flush caches when it should.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62959
--- Comment #23 from Alex Deucher ---
(In reply to comment #22)
> It seems running kernel 3.9-rc6 with attachment 72794 [details] [review]
> with latest mesa (UMAD fixed on Cayman, thanks to commit pushed by Marek)
> allowed me to run all r600
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62959
--- Comment #22 from Alexandre Demers ---
It seems running kernel 3.9-rc6 with attachment 72794 with latest mesa (UMAD
fixed on Cayman, thanks to commit pushed by Marek) allowed me to run all r600
piglit tests without any issue.
--
You are
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62959
--- Comment #21 from Alexandre Demers ---
(In reply to comment #20)
> Sorry I meant to say the "order" test hangs and is unrelated to the other
> hangs and the patches posted here won't help you with it. Anyway, I have
> committed the fix for
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62959
--- Comment #20 from Marek Ol??k ---
Sorry I meant to say the "order" test hangs and is unrelated to the other hangs
and the patches posted here won't help you with it. Anyway, I have committed
the fix for the "order" test now.
--
You are
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62959
--- Comment #19 from Marek Ol??k ---
(In reply to comment #18)
> Attachment 72794 [details] applied on kernel 3.9-rc6 hangs (2 on 2) at
> spec/glsl-1.10/execution/built-in-functions/vs-max-vec2-vec2
>
>
> Applying [...] @@ -459,6 +459,7 @@
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62959
--- Comment #18 from Alexandre Demers ---
Attachment 72794 applied on kernel 3.9-rc6 hangs (2 on 2) at
spec/glsl-1.10/execution/built-in-functions/vs-max-vec2-vec2
Applying [...] @@ -459,6 +459,7 @@ static int radeon_cs_ib_vm_chunk(struct
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62959
--- Comment #23 from Alex Deucher ag...@yahoo.com ---
(In reply to comment #22)
It seems running kernel 3.9-rc6 with attachment 72794 [details] [review]
with latest mesa (UMAD fixed on Cayman, thanks to commit pushed by Marek)
allowed me to
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62959
--- Comment #24 from Marek Olšák mar...@gmail.com ---
Alex, I'm sorry but your patch does not fix the lockups on my Cayman (HD 6950).
:( The piglit test initialized-fbo can be used to reproduce the lockup.
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62959
--- Comment #25 from Alexandre Demers alexandre.f.dem...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #24)
Alex, I'm sorry but your patch does not fix the lockups on my Cayman (HD
6950). :( The piglit test initialized-fbo can be used to reproduce the
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62959
--- Comment #26 from Marek Olšák mar...@gmail.com ---
It's not important for this bug if the test fails (I think it does), what's
important is whether it hangs the machine or not.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62959
--- Comment #27 from Alexandre Demers alexandre.f.dem...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #26)
It's not important for this bug if the test fails (I think it does), what's
important is whether it hangs the machine or not.
That's what I meant.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62959
--- Comment #28 from Alexandre Demers alexandre.f.dem...@gmail.com ---
Marek, you are right and I must have been lucky yesterday when I tested it. I
launched two runs, and hit two different hanging tests this time:
glean/polygonOffset (first run)
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62959
--- Comment #17 from Jerome Glisse ---
Yes this patch should do the trick
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
1 - 100 of 139 matches
Mail list logo
