[Bug 72785] bfgminer --scrypt on 7xxx+

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=72785 --- Comment #40 from Tom Stellard --- (In reply to Linux User from comment #38) > > Do you have an X server running? > I am (on one of GPUs). And I can understand X could be slow, etc and > adjusting intensity on GPU sharing X server is well

[Bug 72785] bfgminer --scrypt on 7xxx+

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=72785 --- Comment #39 from Michel Dänzer --- (In reply to Linux User from comment #36) > P.P.S. and what about better fan/intensity control? See bug 73338. (In reply to Linux User from comment #38) > P.S. also there is another silly issue. If I

[Bug 72785] bfgminer --scrypt on 7xxx+

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=72785 --- Comment #38 from Linux User --- > Do you have an X server running? I am (on one of GPUs). And I can understand X could be slow, etc and adjusting intensity on GPU sharing X server is well known thing to me. But I'm talking about GPU

[Bug 72785] bfgminer --scrypt on 7xxx+

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=72785 --- Comment #37 from Tom Stellard --- (In reply to Linux User from comment #36) > Got similar issues when trying scrypt. I have relatively recent bfgminer (~1 > month old git build) and more or less recent graphics stack: 3.17 kernel, > mesa

[Bug 72785] bfgminer --scrypt on 7xxx+

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=72785 --- Comment #36 from Linux User --- Got similar issues when trying scrypt. I have relatively recent bfgminer (~1 month old git build) and more or less recent graphics stack: 3.17 kernel, mesa 10.4 pre-release from Oibaf PPA and LLVM 3.5.1 I

[Bug 72785] bfgminer --scrypt on 7xxx+

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=72785 --- Comment #35 from Luke-Jr --- (In reply to Luke-Jr from comment #34) > [ 855.257659] radeon :01:00.0: ring 3 stalled for more than 1msec > [ 855.257670] radeon :01:00.0: GPU lockup

[Bug 72785] bfgminer --scrypt on 7xxx+

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=72785 --- Comment #34 from Luke-Jr --- (In reply to Luke-Jr from comment #33) > Looks like clEnqueueNDRangeKernel is re-compiling (or at least optimising?) > the kernel, and taking a long time to do so.

[Bug 72785] bfgminer --scrypt on 7xxx+

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=72785 --- Comment #33 from Luke-Jr --- Looks like clEnqueueNDRangeKernel is re-compiling (or at least optimising?) the kernel, and taking a long time to do so. Isn't compiling supposed to be done *once*

[Bug 72785] bfgminer --scrypt on 7xxx+

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=72785 --- Comment #32 from Christoph Haag --- Doesn't work for me either with llvm 216281 and mesa git Oh and maybe it's not known, at least it wasn't so clear to me: I earlier wrote how my GPU wouldn't get as warm as I expected nor did it display

[Bug 72785] bfgminer --scrypt on 7xxx+

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=72785 --- Comment #31 from darkbasic --- kernel 3.17-rc1 + drm-fixes, llvm git, mesa git -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

[Bug 72785] bfgminer --scrypt on 7xxx+

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=72785 --- Comment #30 from darkbasic --- I get no errors but a ridiculous hash rate and a 100% error rate: 1 68.0C | 442.2/440.0/ 0.0kh/s | A:0 R:0+0(none) HW:8/100% -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 72785] bfgminer --scrypt on 7xxx+

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=72785 --- Comment #29 from darkbasic --- I will try, but I have to upgrade my stack first because I switched to fglrx. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. -- next part -- An HTML

[Bug 72785] bfgminer --scrypt on 7xxx+

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=72785 --- Comment #28 from Tom Stellard --- Does this work with the latest Mesa and LLVM? I've fixed some bugs recently that may help. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. -- next part --

[Bug 72785] bfgminer --scrypt on 7xxx+

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=72785 --- Comment #27 from Christoph Haag --- (In reply to comment #26) > Have you verified that scrypt actually works? Do you ever get any accepted > shares? If it does work, you can close this bug and open another for the > performance issues.

[Bug 72785] bfgminer --scrypt on 7xxx+

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=72785 --- Comment #26 from Tom Stellard --- (In reply to comment #25) > So with 3.16, newest mesa git, llvm trunk from a few days ago etc. I'm > getting about 12.0 khash/sec out of my HD 7970M with all the stuff one > should set: > >

[Bug 72785] bfgminer --scrypt on 7xxx+

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=72785 --- Comment #25 from Christoph Haag --- So with 3.16, newest mesa git, llvm trunk from a few days ago etc. I'm getting about 12.0 khash/sec out of my HD 7970M with all the stuff one should set: GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT=100 GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS=1

[Bug 72785] bfgminer --scrypt on 7xxx+

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=72785 --- Comment #24 from darkbasic --- Sorry, the patch previously did nothing because when I upgraded bfgminer I forgot to add "-S opencl:auto" to the command line parameters. I applied

[Bug 72785] bfgminer --scrypt on 7xxx+

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=72785 --- Comment #23 from Christoph Haag --- Oh, didn't realize the one in the archlinux repository was too old. Anyway, HW errors and % nonces invalid was climbing until 70+% so something was wrong anyway. With bfgminer git I first got

[Bug 72785] bfgminer --scrypt on 7xxx+

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=72785 --- Comment #22 from Alex Deucher --- If you are using 3.14, you may have to force your performance level to high or revert this patch for SI parts:

[Bug 72785] bfgminer --scrypt on 7xxx+

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=72785 --- Comment #21 from Luke-Jr --- Old versions report the hashrate wrongly. Try latest git, or at least a maintained version (3.5.x or 3.10.x) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee

[Bug 72785] bfgminer --scrypt on 7xxx+

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=72785 --- Comment #20 from Christoph Haag --- @Luke-Jr Thanks, I thought that didn't make sense, but then I noticed that I wrote 2&> instead of 2> so it was my fault after all. It looks like it's actually running now with all your patches. AWESOME!

[Bug 72785] bfgminer --scrypt on 7xxx+

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=72785 --- Comment #19 from Tom Stellard --- (In reply to comment #17) > Created attachment 94100 [details] > crash with patches from the pyrit bug > > Sorry, about the double entries, I don't know why it does that. Maybe it's > because it's some

[Bug 72785] bfgminer --scrypt on 7xxx+

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=72785 --- Comment #18 from Luke-Jr --- Log output is duplicated to stderr if it is redirected. So, if you redirect stderr to a file, *only* redirect stderr (not stdout+stderr). -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 72785] bfgminer --scrypt on 7xxx+

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=72785 --- Comment #17 from Christoph Haag --- Created attachment 94100 --> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=94100=edit crash with patches from the pyrit bug Sorry, about the double entries, I don't know why it does that. Maybe it's

[Bug 72785] bfgminer --scrypt on 7xxx+

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=72785 --- Comment #12 from Tom Stellard --- (In reply to comment #11) > Obviously I did it but I see nothing in stderr except the bfgminer output I > already posted. Does bfgminer do anything with the patch, or does it declare the GPU sick? If

[Bug 72785] bfgminer --scrypt on 7xxx+

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=72785 --- Comment #7 from Christoph Haag --- Yes, I have the same now. Either a bfgminer update or a llvm/mesa update fixed the crashes. It seems like it is trying to use the correct GPU: [2014-02-14 15:31:32] OCL 0: Attempting to restart

[Bug 72785] bfgminer --scrypt on 7xxx+

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=72785 --- Comment #6 from darkbasic --- Forgot to say: card is 7950 (radeonsi) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

[Bug 72785] bfgminer --scrypt on 7xxx+

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=72785 --- Comment #5 from darkbasic --- It doesn't crash for me but it doesn't work at all: bfgminer version 3.5.7 - Started: [2014-02-14 14:46:50] - [ 0 days 00:01:56] [M]anage devices [P]ool management [S]ettings [D]isplay options [H]elp [Q]uit

[Bug 72785] bfgminer --scrypt on 7xxx+

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=72785 --- Comment #4 from Christoph Haag --- Created attachment 91965 --> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=91965=edit R600_DEBUG=cs bfgminer -v1 --intensity 8 --shaders 8192 --scrypt -S opencl:auto ... This is with upstream llvm

[Bug 72785] bfgminer --scrypt on 7xxx+

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=72785 --- Comment #3 from Tom Stellard --- (In reply to comment #0) > bfgminer --benchmark without scrypt seems to be working fine now. > > But I think many people would rather compute scrypt right now on their 7xxx+ > GPUs, just considering the

[Bug 72785] bfgminer --scrypt on 7xxx+

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=72785 --- Comment #2 from Christoph Haag --- Created attachment 91500 --> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=91500=edit bfgminer with original scrypt kernel and RADEON_DUMP_SHADERS=1 loop error Well, I would test it if I could get clang

[Bug 72785] bfgminer --scrypt on 7xxx+

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=72785 --- Comment #1 from Christoph Haag --- Hm, I did think there would be some interest. So but because the error had something to do with "llvm.SI.loop" and it said it was in the "search" function there is only this one loop that can be the