https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=86891
Alan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=86891
--- Comment #21 from Michael Mair-Keimberger ---
Just to clarify - the screenshot was made with mesa-10.3.2 and cpu's frequency
set to performance.
With mesa git i got following results:
FPS: 20.0
Score: 838
Min FPS: 7.4
Max FPS: 30.5
Pretty
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=86891
--- Comment #20 from Michael Mair-Keimberger ---
Created attachment 156161
--> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=156161=edit
vally screenshot
(In reply to Andy Furniss from comment #19)
> (In reply to Michael Mair-Keimberger from
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=86891
Andy Furniss changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||adf.lists at gmail.com
--- Comment #19
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=86891
--- Comment #18 from Michael Mair-Keimberger ---
Created attachment 156051
--> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=156051=edit
picture with VRAM and GTT usage
(In reply to Michel Dänzer from comment #17)
> (In reply to Michael
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=86891
--- Comment #17 from Michel Dänzer ---
(In reply to Michael Mair-Keimberger from comment #14)
> Honestly, the difference is incredible. Can't believe such a small change
> has such a big impact.
Yeah, it's really weird. Looking at the change,
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=86891
--- Comment #16 from Michael Mair-Keimberger ---
Created attachment 155921
--> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=155921=edit
another picture
another picture
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=86891
--- Comment #15 from Michael Mair-Keimberger ---
Created attachment 155911
--> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=155911=edit
picture
I've made a few other benchmarks and tried to take some screenshots.
Unfortunately vally doesn't
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=86891
--- Comment #14 from Michael Mair-Keimberger ---
OK, today i made another benchmarks: drm-next, mesa-10.3.2. First without any
changes, second with `git revert 59bc1d8`:
without any changes with `git revert 59bc1d8`
FPS: 14.3
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=86891
--- Comment #13 from Michel Dänzer ---
(In reply to Michael Mair-Keimberger from comment #10)
> I'll get slightly better results with 10.3.2 (with 3.18rc1):
[...]
> But honestly, watching the demo feels like it got even worse. Still very
> long
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=86891
--- Comment #12 from Alex Deucher ---
looks like https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=84500
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=86891
--- Comment #11 from Michael Mair-Keimberger ---
Created attachment 155841
--> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=155841=edit
dmesg output
Don't know if this helps but i just saw that i got strange (?) output in dmesg.
This output
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=86891
--- Comment #10 from Michael Mair-Keimberger ---
(In reply to Michel Dänzer from comment #7)
> Does Mesa 10.3.2 work better, specifically commit
> 64c2bdc334ba472603b1e7cd2c3046cfbce285b6?
I'll get slightly better results with 10.3.2 (with
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=86891
--- Comment #9 from Alex Deucher ---
(In reply to Dieter Nützel from comment #8)
>
> Yes, looks much better, but the code shouldn't touch any relevant
> (radeonsi/r600g) code paths. - Michel?
>
> On r600g (RV730 AGP) I do NOT see any (real)
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=86891
--- Comment #8 from Dieter Nützel ---
(In reply to Michael Mair-Keimberger from comment #6)
> (In reply to Dieter Nützel from comment #5)
> > Can you please test with one of kernel git | 3.18-rc2 | drm-next together
> > with
> > git revert
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=86891
Michel Dänzer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||curaga at operamail.com
--- Comment #7
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=86891
--- Comment #6 from Michael Mair-Keimberger ---
(In reply to Dieter Nützel from comment #5)
> Can you please test with one of kernel git | 3.18-rc2 | drm-next together
> with
> git revert 59bc1d8?
I've tried it with kernel git 3.18rc2 with a
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=86891
Dieter Nützel changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||Dieter at nuetzel-hh.de
--- Comment #5
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=86891
--- Comment #4 from Michael Mair-Keimberger ---
Created attachment 155491
--> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=155491=edit
bisec.tar.gz
Additional all benchmarks i've made from every bisected kernel. the first one
is the 3.16rc7
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=86891
--- Comment #3 from Michael Mair-Keimberger ---
I though it takes more time, but i already finished bisecting :)
The result:
59bc1d89d6a4d67c94a9b70fa81bda1d5b04f0cb is the first bad commit
commit 59bc1d89d6a4d67c94a9b70fa81bda1d5b04f0cb
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=86891
--- Comment #2 from Michael Mair-Keimberger ---
(In reply to Alex Deucher from comment #1)
> Likely a duplicate of:
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=84662
> and
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=84570
> Can you bisect?
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=86891
Alex Deucher changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||alexdeucher at gmail.com
--- Comment #1
22 matches
Mail list logo
