Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/dp: Correctly mask DP_TRAINING_AUX_RD_INTERVAL values for DP 1.4

2018-03-16 Thread kbuild test robot
Hi Matt, Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve: [auto build test WARNING on v4.16-rc4] [also build test WARNING on next-20180316] [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system] url:

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/dp: Correctly mask DP_TRAINING_AUX_RD_INTERVAL values for DP 1.4

2018-03-15 Thread Rodrigo Vivi
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 02:08:51PM -0700, matthew.s.atw...@intel.com wrote: > From: Matt Atwood > > DP_TRAINING_AUX_RD_INTERVAL with DP 1.3 spec changed bit scheeme from 8 > bits to 7 in DPCD 0x000e. The 8th bit is used to identify extended > receiver capabilities.

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/dp: Correctly mask DP_TRAINING_AUX_RD_INTERVAL values for DP 1.4

2018-03-14 Thread Rodrigo Vivi
On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 01:20:06PM -0700, matthew.s.atw...@intel.com wrote: > From: Matt Atwood > > DP_TRAINING_AUX_RD_INTERVAL with DP 1.3 spec changed bit scheeme from 8 > bits to 7 in DPCD 0x000e. The 8th bit is used to identify extended > receiver capabilities.

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/dp: Correctly mask DP_TRAINING_AUX_RD_INTERVAL values for DP 1.4

2018-03-12 Thread Rodrigo Vivi
On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 11:49:44PM +, Atwood, Matthew S wrote: > On Thu, 2018-03-08 at 09:22 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: > > On Wed, 07 Mar 2018, matthew.s.atw...@intel.com wrote: > > > > > > From: Matt Atwood > > > > > > DP_TRAINING_AUX_RD_INTERVAL with DP 1.3

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/dp: Correctly mask DP_TRAINING_AUX_RD_INTERVAL values for DP 1.4

2018-03-09 Thread Atwood, Matthew S
On Thu, 2018-03-08 at 09:22 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Wed, 07 Mar 2018, matthew.s.atw...@intel.com wrote: > > > > From: Matt Atwood > > > > DP_TRAINING_AUX_RD_INTERVAL with DP 1.3 spec changed bit scheeme > > from 8 > > bits to 7 in DPCD 0x000e. The 8th bit is

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/dp: Correctly mask DP_TRAINING_AUX_RD_INTERVAL values for DP 1.4

2018-03-07 Thread Jani Nikula
On Wed, 07 Mar 2018, matthew.s.atw...@intel.com wrote: > From: Matt Atwood > > DP_TRAINING_AUX_RD_INTERVAL with DP 1.3 spec changed bit scheeme from 8 > bits to 7 in DPCD 0x000e. The 8th bit is used to identify extended > receiver capabilities. For panels that use this

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/dp: Correctly mask DP_TRAINING_AUX_RD_INTERVAL values for DP 1.4

2018-03-07 Thread Manasi Navare
On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 03:44:09PM -0800, matthew.s.atw...@intel.com wrote: > From: Matt Atwood > > DP_TRAINING_AUX_RD_INTERVAL with DP 1.3 spec changed bit scheeme from 8 > bits to 7 in DPCD 0x000e. The 8th bit is used to identify extended > receiver capabilities.

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/dp: Correctly mask DP_TRAINING_AUX_RD_INTERVAL values for DP 1.4

2018-03-07 Thread Manasi Navare
On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 02:06:08PM -0800, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 02:13:21AM +, Pandiyan, Dhinakaran wrote: > > > > > > > > On Tue, 2018-03-06 at 17:36 -0800, Manasi Navare wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 12:24:46AM +, Pandiyan, Dhinakaran wrote: > > > > > >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/dp: Correctly mask DP_TRAINING_AUX_RD_INTERVAL values for DP 1.4

2018-03-07 Thread Rodrigo Vivi
On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 02:13:21AM +, Pandiyan, Dhinakaran wrote: > > > > On Tue, 2018-03-06 at 17:36 -0800, Manasi Navare wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 12:24:46AM +, Pandiyan, Dhinakaran wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, 2018-03-06 at 15:24 -0800, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > > >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/dp: Correctly mask DP_TRAINING_AUX_RD_INTERVAL values for DP 1.4

2018-03-06 Thread Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
On Tue, 2018-03-06 at 17:36 -0800, Manasi Navare wrote: > On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 12:24:46AM +, Pandiyan, Dhinakaran wrote: > > > > > > > > On Tue, 2018-03-06 at 15:24 -0800, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar 06, 2018 at 10:37:48AM -0800, matthew.s.atw...@intel.com > > > wrote: > >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/dp: Correctly mask DP_TRAINING_AUX_RD_INTERVAL values for DP 1.4

2018-03-06 Thread Manasi Navare
On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 12:24:46AM +, Pandiyan, Dhinakaran wrote: > > > > On Tue, 2018-03-06 at 15:24 -0800, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 06, 2018 at 10:37:48AM -0800, matthew.s.atw...@intel.com wrote: > > > From: Matt Atwood > > > > > >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/dp: Correctly mask DP_TRAINING_AUX_RD_INTERVAL values for DP 1.4

2018-03-06 Thread Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
On Tue, 2018-03-06 at 16:48 -0800, Dhinakaran Pandiyan wrote: > > > On Tue, 2018-03-06 at 15:24 -0800, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 06, 2018 at 10:37:48AM -0800, matthew.s.atw...@intel.com wrote: > > > From: Matt Atwood > > > > > >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/dp: Correctly mask DP_TRAINING_AUX_RD_INTERVAL values for DP 1.4

2018-03-06 Thread Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
On Tue, 2018-03-06 at 15:24 -0800, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > On Tue, Mar 06, 2018 at 10:37:48AM -0800, matthew.s.atw...@intel.com wrote: > > From: Matt Atwood > > > > DP_TRAINING_AUX_RD_INTERVAL with DP 1.3 spec changed bit scheme from 8 > > bits to 7 bits in DPCD

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/dp: Correctly mask DP_TRAINING_AUX_RD_INTERVAL values for DP 1.4

2018-03-06 Thread Rodrigo Vivi
On Tue, Mar 06, 2018 at 10:37:48AM -0800, matthew.s.atw...@intel.com wrote: > From: Matt Atwood > > DP_TRAINING_AUX_RD_INTERVAL with DP 1.3 spec changed bit scheme from 8 > bits to 7 bits in DPCD 0x000e. The 8th bit describes a new feature, for > panels that use this