On 11/17/11 9:13 PM, Keith Packard wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 17:45:40 -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
>
>> Your silicon people worry me.
>
> In any case, the changes are mostly to move bits around so that there
> are two bits for pipe select
Yeah, the patch looks like it could be correct, just
On 11/17/11 9:13 PM, Keith Packard wrote:
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 17:45:40 -0500, Adam Jacksona...@redhat.com wrote:
Your silicon people worry me.
In any case, the changes are mostly to move bits around so that there
are two bits for pipe select
Yeah, the patch looks like it could be correct,
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 17:45:40 -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
> Your silicon people worry me.
In any case, the changes are mostly to move bits around so that there
are two bits for pipe select
> I don't even. Unless you're looking at some other version of the DP
> spec than me, I was pretty sure
On Wed, 2011-11-16 at 16:29 -0800, Keith Packard wrote:
> The Ivybridge eDP control register looks like a cross between a
> Cougarpoint PCH DP control register and a Sandybridge eDP control
> register.
Your silicon people worry me.
> +/* IVB */
> +#define EDP_LINK_TRAIN_400MV_0DB_IVB
